GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in github.com/open-policy-agent/opa. 3 public exploit references exist, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for github.com/open-policy-agent/opa — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OPA Compiler: Bypass of WithUnsafeBuiltins using "with" keyword to mock functions
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/open-policy-agent/opaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The Rego compiler provides a (deprecated) WithUnsafeBuiltins function, which allows users to provide a set of built-in functions that should be deemed unsafe — and as such rejected — by the compiler if encountered in the policy compilation stage. A bypass of this protection has been found, where the use of the with keyword to mock such a built-in function (a feature introduced in OPA v0.40.0), isn’t taken into account by WithUnsafeBuiltins.
The same method is exposed via rego.UnsafeBuiltins in the github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/rego package.
When provided e.g. the http.send built-in function to WithUnsafeBuiltins, the following policy would still compile, and call the http.send function with the arguments provided to the is_object function when evaluated:
package policy
foo := is_object({
"method": "get",
"url": "https://www.openpolicyagent.org"
})
allow := r {
r := foo with is_object as http.send
}
Both built-in functions and user provided (i.e. custom) functions are mockable using this construct.
In addition to http.send, the opa.runtime built-in function is commonly considered unsafe in integrations where policy provided by untrusted parties is evaluated, as it risks exposing configuration, or environment variables, potentially carrying sensitive information.
Affected Users
All of these conditions have to be met to create an adverse effect:
- Use the Go API for policy evaluation (not the OPA server, or the Go SDK)
- Make use of the
WithUnsafeBuiltinsmethod in order to deny certain built-in functions, like e.g.http.send, from being used in policy evaluation. - Allow policy evaluation of policies provided by untrusted parties.
- The policies evaluated include the
withkeyword to rewrite/mock a built-in, or custom, function to that of another built-in function, such ashttp.send.
Additionally, the OPA Query API is affected:
- If the OPA Query API is exposed to the public, and it is relied on
http.sendto be unavailable in that context. Exposing the OPA API to the public without proper authentication and authorization in place is generally advised against.
Patches
v0.43.1, v0.44.0
Workarounds
The WithUnsafeBuiltins function has been considered deprecated since the introduction of the capabilities feature in OPA v0.23.0 . While the function was commented as deprecated, the format of the comment was however not following the convention for deprecated functions, and might not have been picked up by tooling like editors. This has now been fixed. Users are still encouraged to use the capabilities feature over the deprecated WithUnsafeBuiltins function.
If you cannot upgrade, consider using capabilities instead:
Code like this using the github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/ast package:
// VULNERABLE with OPA <= 0.43.0
unsafeBuiltins := map[string]struct{}{
ast.HTTPSend.Name: struct{}{},
}
compiler := ast.NewCompiler().WithUnsafeBuiltins(unsafeBuiltins)
needs to be changed to this:
caps := ast.CapabilitiesForThisVersion()
var j int
for i, bi := range caps.Builtins {
if bi.Name == ast.HTTPSend.Name {
j = i
break
}
}
caps.Builtins[j] = caps.Builtins[len(caps.Builtins)-1] // put last element into position j
caps.Builtins = caps.Builtins[:len(caps.Builtins)-1] // truncate slice
compiler := ast.NewCompiler().WithCapabilities(caps)
When using the github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/rego package:
// VULNERABLE with OPA <= 0.43.0
r := rego.New(
// other options omitted
rego.UnsafeBuiltins(map[string]struct{}{ast.HTTPSend.Name: struct{}{}}),
)
needs to be changed to
r := rego.New(
// other options omitted
rego.Capabilities(caps),
)
with caps defined above.
Note that in the process, some error messages will change: http.send in this example will no longer be "unsafe" and thus forbidden, but it will simply become an "unknown function".
References
- Fix commit on
main: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/commit/25a597bc3f4985162e7f65f9c36599f4f8f55823 - Fix commit in 0.43.1 release: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/commit/3e8c754ed007b22393cf65e48751ad9f6457fee8, release page for 0.43.1: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/releases/tag/v0.43.1
- Function mocking feature introduced in https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/pull/4540 and https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/pull/4616
- Documentation on the capabilities feature, which is the preferred way of providing a list of allowed built-in functions. The capabilities feature is not affected by this vulnerability.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in Community Discussions
- Ask in Slack: https://slack.openpolicyagent.org/
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/open-policy-agent/opa | ≥ 0.40.0&&< 0.43.1 | 0.43.1go get github.com/open-policy-agent/opa@v0.43.1 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/open-policy-agent/opa, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/open-policy-agent/opa to 0.43.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-f524-rf33-2jjr across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.