NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎
💎 RubyGems
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

XSS sidekiq-unique-jobs UI server vulnerabilityGHSA-cmh9-rx85-xj38

HIGHFix: mhenrixon/sidekiq-unique-jobs@cd09ba6

GHSA-cmh9-rx85-xj38 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in sidekiq-unique-jobs. A fix is available for sidekiq-unique-jobs — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-cmh9-rx85-xj38.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs49th percentile — riskier than 49% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.37%0.73%1.10%0.3%0.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
💎sidekiq-unique-jobs💎sidekiq-unique-jobs

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Cross site scripting (XSS) potentially exposing cookies / sessions / localStorage, fixed by sidekiq-unique-jobs v8.0.7.

Specifically, this is a Reflected (Server-Side), Non-Self, Cross Site Scripting vulnerability, considered a P3 on the BugCrowd taxonomy with the following categorization: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) > Reflected > Non-Self

It was initially thought there was a second vulnerability (RCE), but it was a false alarm. Injection is impossible with Redis:

String escaping and NoSQL injection The Redis protocol has no concept of string escaping, so injection is impossible under normal circumstances using a normal client library. The protocol uses prefixed-length strings and is completely binary safe.

Ref: https://redis.io/docs/management/security/

XSS Vulnerability

Specially crafted GET request parameters handled by any of the following endpoints of sidekiq-unique-jobs' "admin" web UI, allow a super-user attacker, or an unwitting, but authorized, victim, who has received a disguised / crafted link, to successfully execute malicious code, which could potentially steal cookies, session data, or local storage data from the app the sidekiq-unique-jobs web UI is mounted in.

  1. /changelogs
  2. /locks
  3. /expiring_locks

This means if your sidekiq-unique-jobs web UI is mounted at /sidekiq, the vulnerable paths are:

  1. /sidekiq/changelogs
  2. /sidekiq/locks
  3. /sidekiq/expiring_locks

XSS vulnerability is an instance of CAPEC-32: XSS Through HTTP Query Strings, which is related to CWE-80. In certain cases where it results in a server error with status 500, it could be considered a vector for uncontrolled resource consumption, given that errors can be much more resource intensive that normal requests, and thus CWE-400 & CWE-754 may also be relevant.

Details

Fix for the XSS vulnerability was released in sidekiq-unique-jobs v8.0.7.

This is an analogous attack vector to that which affected sidekiq gem from version v7.0.4 to v7.0.7, and was given identifiers GHSA-h3r8-h5qw-4r35 & CVE-2023-1892.

The vulnerability in sidekiq-unique-jobs' was not fixed by sidekiq v7.0.8, nor the more recent sidekiq v7.2.0 releases; they are similar but unrelated, distinct vulnerabilities in adjacent projects.

Note #1: The admin web UI for sidekiq-unique-jobs is not protected by any authorization constraint in the default configuration. Auth constraints must be configured by the programmer. It is recommended and expected that users will configure authorization constrains on the "admin" UI. This is not specifically related to the vulnerability but may make users who fail to constrain their "admin" UI even more vulnerable.

Note #2: Most users of the library will not have configured the UI on a sandboxed subdomain, making all their cookies, localStorage data and session secrets vulnerable to exposure. The purpose of a sandboxed subdomain is expressly to prevent leaking sensitive data through XSS attacks.

XSS Fix PR: https://github.com/mhenrixon/sidekiq-unique-jobs/pull/829

PoC

XSS

Use a string like:

%22%3E%3Cimg/src/onerror=alert(document.domain)%3E

as the value for one of the parameters that are handled without escaping. Reference: https://liveoverflow.com/do-not-use-alert-1-in-xss/

  1. Visit /sidekiq/changelogs - with a crafted query string like one of the following: a. Screenshot: XSS changelogs sidekiq-unique-jobs lte v8 0 6 b. filter is XSS vulnerable: ?filter=%22%3E%3Cimg/src/onerror=alert(document.domain)%3E c. count is vulnerable to triggering an application error (status 500), potentially allowing resource exhaustion ?count=%22%3E%3Cimg/src/onerror=alert(document.domain)%3E
    1. Screenshot: 1c changelogs count
  2. Visit /sidekiq/locks - with a crafted query string like one of the following: a. Screenshot: XSS locks sidekiq-unique-jobs lte v8 0 6 b. filter is XSS vulnerable: ?filter=%22%3E%3Cimg/src/onerror=alert(document.domain)%3E c. count is vulnerable to triggering an application error (status 500), potentially allowing resource exhaustion ?count=%22%3E%3Cimg/src/onerror=alert(document.domain)%3E
    1. Screenshot: 2c locks count
  3. Visit /sidekiq/expiring_locks - with a crafted query string like one of the following: a. Screenshot: XSS expiring_locks sidekiq-unique-jobs lte v8 0 6 b. filter is XSS vulnerable: ?filter=%22%3E%3Cimg/src/onerror=alert(document.domain)%3E

Impact

This is a vulnerability of critical severity, which impacts many thousands of sites, since sidekiq-unique-jobs is widely deployed across the industry, with multiple attack vectors.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemssidekiq-unique-jobs≥ 8.0.0&&< 8.0.78.0.7bundle update sidekiq-unique-jobs --conservative
💎RubyGemssidekiq-unique-jobs≥ 6.0.0.rc7&&< 7.1.337.1.33bundle update sidekiq-unique-jobs --conservative

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
sidekiqcontribsys
1 version
6.5.8

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sidekiq-unique-jobs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update sidekiq-unique-jobs to 8.0.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cmh9-rx85-xj38 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Constrain what reaches the vulnerable code: limit the size and shape of untrusted input, isolate the affected component in a sandboxed or least-privileged process, and enable the platform's memory-safety mitigations (ASLR, stack protector, hardened allocator) so an out-of-bounds access is more likely to fail closed than to be exploitable.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Cross site scripting (XSS) potentially exposing cookies / sessions / localStorage, fixed by `sidekiq-unique-jobs` v8.0.7. Specifically, this is a Reflected (Server-Side), Non-Self, Cross Site Scripting vulnerability, considered a **_P3_** on the BugCrowd [taxonomy](https://bugcrowd.com/vulnerability-rating-taxonomy) with the following categorization: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) > Reflected > Non-Self It was initially thought there was a second vulnerability (RCE), but it was a false alarm. Injection is impossible with Redis: > String escaping and NoSQL injection > The Redis pro
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cmh9-rx85-xj38 in your dependencies?

Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.

XSS sidekiq-unique-jobs UI server vulnerability (High 7.1)