GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 — dompurify
Fix: cure53/DOMPurify#1557GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in dompurify. A fix is available for dompurify — see the affected versions and patch details below.
DOMPurify: IN_PLACE hook removal leaves a detached subtree executable, causing XSS
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
dompurifynpmDescription
Summary
During IN_PLACE sanitization, a hook that removes an element can leave that element's detached descendants executable. A descendant image can retain its attacker-provided onload handler and fire after sanitize() returns, even though the returned root is clean and the image remains disconnected from the document.
Details
In DOMPurify 3.4.12, _sanitizeElements() in src/purify.ts:1862-1904 runs the beforeSanitizeElements or uponSanitizeElement hook and returns immediately when the hook detached the current node. The return does not call _neutralizeSubtree(currentNode).
The detached subtree is not added to DOMPurify.removed, so the post-walk IN_PLACE neutralization cannot reach it. If the browser queued a resource event while the application constructed the detached dirty root, a descendant can therefore retain its handler and execute after sanitization.
The hook only rejects the containing element and does not add or approve the event handler. DOMPurify's ordinary removal path de-arms the same queued event; only the hook-detachment early return skips the existing subtree neutralization.
PoC
Load the published [email protected] dist/purify.js before this script in Chromium:
<div id="result">not fired</div>
<script>
const root = document.createElement('div');
root.innerHTML = `
<footer>
<img src=""
onload="result.textContent = 'XSS after sanitize'">
</footer>
<div>safe</div>`;
DOMPurify.setConfig({
ALLOWED_TAGS: ['div', '#text', 'footer'],
IN_PLACE: true
});
DOMPurify.addHook('uponSanitizeElement', node => {
if (node.tagName === 'FOOTER') node.remove();
});
DOMPurify.sanitize(root);
document.body.append(root);
</script>
sanitize() returns with no handler execution and the returned root contains only the safe div. After the event loop advances, the original image remains disconnected but its retained onload changes the page to XSS after sanitize.
As the claim-matched control, use the same detached input with ALLOWED_TAGS: ['div', '#text'] and no hook. DOMPurify's ordinary removal path removes the original image's handler, the returned root is still <div>safe</div>, and the marker does not fire.
Impact
In an application that uses IN_PLACE with the documented element-removal hook pattern, an attacker who can supply HTML can execute JavaScript in the integrating application's origin after the application sanitizes and renders that content.
The required non-default configuration is IN_PLACE plus a hook that removes a containing element. The hook does not add or approve the event handler, and the dirty root never needs to be connected before sanitization.
Suggested fix
Reuse the existing _neutralizeSubtree(currentNode) helper before returning from both hook-detachment branches in _sanitizeElements(). Add regressions for beforeSanitizeElements and uponSanitizeElement that retain a reference to a descendant resource element and verify that its event handler is removed after the hook detaches its ancestor.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | dompurify | all versions | 3.4.13npm install dompurify@3.4.13 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for dompurify, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update dompurify to 3.4.13 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This cross-site scripting flaw in DOMPurify affects Red Hat products that utilize the library for HTML sanitization. The vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript by exploiting incomplete neutralization of detached subtrees during IN_PLACE sanitization, but only when a non-default configuration…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10 | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1789411269 | RHSA-2026:67711 |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.11 | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel9:1789411320 | RHSA-2026:67714 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1788775748 | RHSA-2026:65118 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1788783591 | RHSA-2026:65155 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana13-1-main-13.1.3-0.9.hum1 | RHSA-2026:67573 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30 | devspaces/openvsx-rhel9:1787759145 | RHSA-2026:62260 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel9:1789050085 | RHSA-2026:68690 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.4 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel9:1789475294 | RHSA-2026:68695 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.