CVE-2026-77633 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) CWE-362 vulnerability in github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4. A fix is available for github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Cloudreve: Storage-quota TOCTOU race allows quota bypass and storage-based denial of service
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-77633.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-77633 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Cloudreve v4 splits the storage-quota check (reading the user's used bytes and comparing them to MaxStorage) and the charge (incrementing users.storage) into two non-atomic steps in the PrepareUpload code path. This creates a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition. Any authenticated user — including an unprivileged account in the default User group — can concurrently issue several upload-session requests that all read the same stale used snapshot, each pass the check, and then each contribute their declared size to users.storage. The end result is that the total approved capacity exceeds the group's MaxStorage many times over.
The same primitive is trivially amplifiable into a storage-based denial of service. During PrepareUpload, Cloudreve reserves the declared size against users.storage before any bytes are written, so an attacker can push the reserved amount far beyond the host's physical disk (tested: a 1 GiB-quota account reserved 17 GiB in a single 20-way burst), and can then materialise the reservation by completing chunked uploads to actually write the excess bytes to disk. Amplification to the host's free space fills the disk and denies uploads for every user of the instance.
Exploitation requires only a valid session with Files.Write permission. No administrator configuration, no non-default storage policy, and no elevated privileges are needed. The default deployment (local storage policy, default User group) is affected.
Technical details
PrepareUpload in pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/upload.go splits quota enforcement across two stages:
Stage A — the check (snapshot compare, no lock) — pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/validator.go:
func (f *DBFS) validateUserCapacity(ctx context.Context, size int64, u *ent.User) error {
capacity, err := f.Capacity(ctx, u) // reads "used"
if err != nil { return ... }
return f.validateUserCapacityRaw(ctx, size, capacity)
}
func (f *DBFS) validateUserCapacityRaw(ctx context.Context, size int64, capacity *fs.Capacity) error {
if capacity.Used + size > capacity.Total { // snapshot compare only; no lock, no reservation
return fs.ErrInsufficientCapacity
}
return nil
}
capacity.Used comes from the in-memory *ent.User that was hydrated once at the beginning of the request — pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/dbfs.go:
func (f *DBFS) Capacity(ctx context.Context, u *ent.User) (*fs.Capacity, error) {
...
res.Used = f.user.Storage // captured at request start
res.Total = requesterGroup.MaxStorage
return res, nil
}
No SELECT is issued at check time, no row lock is taken on the user row, and pending upload sessions are not counted.
Stage B — the charge (single unconditional UPDATE, outside the tx) — pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/upload.go → inventory/tx.go → inventory/user.go:
// PrepareUpload: check (A) ... then, many statements later ...
if err := f.validateUserCapacity(ctx, req.Props.Size, ancestor.Owner()); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
...
if err := inventory.CommitWithStorageDiff(ctx, dbTx, f.l, f.userClient); err != nil { ... } // charge (B)
// inventory/user.go
c.client.User.Update().Where(user.ID(uid)).AddStorage(diff).Exec(ctx) // SQL: storage = storage + diff
Between A and B the code performs storage-policy load-balancing, save-path generation, encryption-metadata generation, transaction start, placeholder-file/entity creation, and metadata upsert. This leaves a wide race window. N concurrent PrepareUpload requests each read the same stale Used snapshot at A, each pass their independent quota check, and then each add their own size to users.storage at B. The committed total is up to N × size above MaxStorage.
Three defensive controls that would each independently close the race are missing:
- The check and the charge are not enclosed in the same transaction with a
SELECT ... FOR UPDATEon the user row. - The charge is a plain
storage = storage + :sizeUPDATE, not an atomic conditional update of the formUPDATE users SET storage = storage + :size WHERE id = :uid AND storage + :size <= :max_storage. Usedis computed only from committed entities. Concurrent pending upload sessions (which have already been reserved by the accounting model) are not counted, so races among sessions that haven't yet completed are invisible to each other.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 | all versions | 4.0.0-20260715025621-7329602751c0go get github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4@v4.0.0-20260715025621-7329602751c0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 to 4.0.0-20260715025621-7329602751c0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-77633 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-77633 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.