Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Withdrawn — this advisory has been retracted
🐹 Go

GHSA-9r5x-fjv3-q6h4

HIGH

Duplicate Advisory: Incorrect Access Control in github.com/nats-io/jwt and github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2

Also known asBIT-nats-2021-3127CVE-2021-3127GHSA-62mh-w5cv-p88cGHSA-j756-f273-xhp4GO-2022-0386
Published
Feb 15, 2022
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
1 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk70th percentile+1.17%
0.00%0.65%1.31%1.96%0.3%1.5%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/nats-io/jwt/v2🐹github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2🐹github.com/nats-io/jwt

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-62mh-w5cv-p88c (for github.com/nats-io/jwt) and GHSA-j756-f273-xhp4 (for github.com/nats-io/nats-server). This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

NATS Server (github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2/server) 2.x before 2.2.0 and JWT library (github.com/nats-io/jwt/v2) before 2.0.1 have Incorrect Access Control because Import Token bindings are mishandled.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/nats-io/jwt/v2all versions2.0.1
🐹Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2all versions2.2.0
🐹Gogithub.com/nats-io/jwtall versions1.2.3-0.20210314221642-a826c77dc9d2
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/nats-io/jwt/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/nats-io/jwt/v2 to 2.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9r5x-fjv3-q6h4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9r5x-fjv3-q6h4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9r5x-fjv3-q6h4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-62mh-w5cv-p88c (for github.com/nats-io/jwt) and GHSA-j756-f273-xhp4 (for github.com/nats-io/nats-server). This link is maintained to preserve external references. ## Original Description NATS Server (github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2/server) 2.x before 2.2.0 and JWT library (github.com/nats-io/jwt/v2) before 2.0.1 have Incorrect Access Control because Import Token bindings are mishandled.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9r5x-fjv3-q6h4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9r5x-fjv3-q6h4 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.