Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc

MEDIUM

Extract has insufficient checks allowing attacker to create symlinks outside the extraction directory.

Also known asCVE-2024-47877GO-2024-3196
Published
Oct 11, 2024
Updated
Oct 15, 2024
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
1 / 3
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk41th percentile-0.06%
0.03%0.46%0.89%1.31%0.8%0.5%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3🐹github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4🐹github.com/codeclysm/extract

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

A maliciously crafted archive may allow an attacker to create a symlink outside the extraction target directory.

Patches

Please use version 4.0.0 or later github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4. Any previous version is affected by the bug.

Workarounds

No knows workarounds.

Backward compatibility notes about upgrading to /v4 from /v3

If you're not using the extract.Extractor.FS interface, you will not face any breaking changes and upgrading should be as simple as changing the import to /v4. This should be the case for most of the userbase.

If you're using the Extractor.FS interface, then upgrading to /v4 will require to implement the new methods that have been added:

type FS interface {
    Link(string, string) error
    MkdirAll(string, os.FileMode) error
    OpenFile(name string, flag int, perm os.FileMode) (*os.File, error)
    Symlink(string, string) error

    // The following methods have been added in the /v4 interface:

    Remove(path string) error
    Stat(name string) (os.FileInfo, error)
    Chmod(name string, mode os.FileMode) error
}

There should be no other breaking changes in the /v4 API.

Affected Packages

3 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/codeclysm/extract/v3all versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/codeclysm/extract/v4all versions4.0.0
🐹Gogithub.com/codeclysm/extractall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    No patched version of github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3 has shipped for GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact A maliciously crafted archive may allow an attacker to create a symlink outside the extraction target directory. ### Patches Please use version 4.0.0 or later `github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4`. Any previous version is affected by the bug. ### Workarounds No knows workarounds. ### Backward compatibility notes about upgrading to `/v4` from `/v3` If you're not using the `extract.Extractor.FS` interface, you will not face any breaking changes and upgrading should be as simple as changing the import to `/v4`. This should be the case for most of the userbase. If you're using the `Ext
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.