GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3. A fix is available for github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Extract has insufficient checks allowing attacker to create symlinks outside the extraction directory.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3🐹github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4🐹github.com/codeclysm/extractReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
A maliciously crafted archive may allow an attacker to create a symlink outside the extraction target directory.
Patches
Please use version 4.0.0 or later github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4. Any previous version is affected by the bug.
Workarounds
No knows workarounds.
Backward compatibility notes about upgrading to /v4 from /v3
If you're not using the extract.Extractor.FS interface, you will not face any breaking changes and upgrading should be as simple as changing the import to /v4. This should be the case for most of the userbase.
If you're using the Extractor.FS interface, then upgrading to /v4 will require to implement the new methods that have been added:
type FS interface {
Link(string, string) error
MkdirAll(string, os.FileMode) error
OpenFile(name string, flag int, perm os.FileMode) (*os.File, error)
Symlink(string, string) error
// The following methods have been added in the /v4 interface:
Remove(path string) error
Stat(name string) (os.FileInfo, error)
Chmod(name string, mode os.FileMode) error
}
There should be no other breaking changes in the /v4 API.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3 | all versions | No fix |
| 🐹Go | github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4 | all versions | 4.0.0go get github.com/codeclysm/extract/v4@v4.0.0 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/codeclysm/extract | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
No patched version of github.com/codeclysm/extract/v3 has shipped for GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.