Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57

HIGHFix: pnpm/pnpm@612a2e6

GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in pnpm. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

pnpm: `patch-remove` could delete project-selected files outside the patches directory

Also known asCVE-2026-59194
Published
Jun 27, 2026
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.90%0.3%0.4%0.4%Aug 26Sep 26Sep 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 370,894 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

386other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
pnpmnpm
161.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The patch-remove deletion-scope issue tracked as GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 / CAND-PNPM-030 has been addressed in pnpm.

A crafted patch entry could resolve outside the configured patches directory and cause pnpm patch-remove to delete an arbitrary reachable file. This patch validates the configured directory and every resolved target before unlinking anything, then deletes the final directory entry without following it.

Security boundary

  • Traversal and absolute paths that resolve outside the configured patches directory are rejected before deletion.
  • Parent directories are canonicalized before deletion, including the case where a nested symlink points outside and the final outside entry is itself dangling.
  • The complete batch is validated before any file is removed.
  • Component-aware predicates accept valid names beginning with .. while still rejecting parent traversal, Windows drive escapes, and UNC escapes.
  • Valid files and symlinked patch directories whose canonical targets remain below the lockfile directory continue to work.
  • A final symlink inside a valid patch directory is unlinked without following its target, including when the target is outside or dangling.

Exploit replay

Before the patch, a workspace patchedDependencies path that resolved outside the project caused pnpm patch-remove to delete the external sentinel. A second replay used a nested parent symlink and a dangling outside victim: realpath() returned ENOENT, yet the victim was still removed. With this patch, both paths are rejected and the outside entries remain intact.

Files changed

  • patching/commands/src/isSubdirectory.ts performs component-aware containment checks.
  • patching/commands/src/patchRemove.ts validates the full batch, canonicalizes parents, and unlinks final entries without following them.
  • patching/commands/test/{isSubdirectory,patchRemove}.test.ts covers traversal, nested symlinks, dangling victims, and valid removals.

Commands run

$ pnpm --filter @pnpm/patching.commands test test/isSubdirectory.test.ts test/patchRemove.test.ts
PASS: 11 tests across 2 suites
$ pnpm --filter @pnpm/patching.commands run compile
PASS
$ git diff --check
PASS

Validation

  • Focused handler and path-predicate suites: 11 passed across 2 suites.
  • Package-wide ESLint: passed.
  • Package TypeScript build: passed.
  • Commit hooks, Commitlint, and git diff --check: passed.
  • The broader integration harness was environment-blocked because it writes outside the available temporary root; focused handler tests used /private/tmp.

Patches

10.34.4: https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/commit/352ae489f1b14ffdc19d2c6eacb1b06b098c2ddc 11.7.0: https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/commit/612a2e6a7333f2b061f452a21b6e62c1c161747f

Compatibility

Missing patch files remain no-ops. Valid symlinked patch directories continue to work when their canonical target stays inside the lockfile directory, and final symlinks are removed without touching their targets. patch-remove is not yet in pacquet's command surface, so no Rust-side parity change is required.

Remaining risk

Portable Node APIs do not expose directory-fd-relative unlinkat(). A local attacker who can replace an already validated parent directory before the unlink may still win a time-of-check/time-of-use race. The reproduced repository-controlled traversal and symlink paths do not require that concurrent capability and are blocked by this patch.


Written by an agent (Codex, GPT-5).

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmpnpmall versions10.34.4
📦npmpnpm11.0.0&&< 11.7.011.7.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pnpm. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update pnpm to 10.34.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The `patch-remove` deletion-scope issue tracked as GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 / CAND-PNPM-030 has been addressed in pnpm. A crafted patch entry could resolve outside the configured patches directory and cause `pnpm patch-remove` to delete an arbitrary reachable file. This patch validates the configured directory and every resolved target before unlinking anything, then deletes the final directory entry without following it. ## Security boundary - Traversal and absolute paths that resolve outside the configured patches directory are rejected before deletion. - Parent directories are can
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57: pnpm (High 7.1) | O3 Security