CVE-2026-59194 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in pnpm. A fix is available for pnpm — see the affected versions and patch details below.
pnpm: patch-remove could delete project-selected files outside the patches directory
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-59194.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-59194 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
pnpmnpmDescription
Summary
The patch-remove deletion-scope issue tracked as GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 / CAND-PNPM-030 has been addressed in pnpm.
A crafted patch entry could resolve outside the configured patches directory and cause pnpm patch-remove to delete an arbitrary reachable file. This patch validates the configured directory and every resolved target before unlinking anything, then deletes the final directory entry without following it.
Security boundary
- Traversal and absolute paths that resolve outside the configured patches directory are rejected before deletion.
- Parent directories are canonicalized before deletion, including the case where a nested symlink points outside and the final outside entry is itself dangling.
- The complete batch is validated before any file is removed.
- Component-aware predicates accept valid names beginning with
..while still rejecting parent traversal, Windows drive escapes, and UNC escapes. - Valid files and symlinked patch directories whose canonical targets remain below the lockfile directory continue to work.
- A final symlink inside a valid patch directory is unlinked without following its target, including when the target is outside or dangling.
Exploit replay
Before the patch, a workspace patchedDependencies path that resolved outside the project caused pnpm patch-remove to delete the external sentinel. A second replay used a nested parent symlink and a dangling outside victim: realpath() returned ENOENT, yet the victim was still removed. With this patch, both paths are rejected and the outside entries remain intact.
Files changed
patching/commands/src/isSubdirectory.tsperforms component-aware containment checks.patching/commands/src/patchRemove.tsvalidates the full batch, canonicalizes parents, and unlinks final entries without following them.patching/commands/test/{isSubdirectory,patchRemove}.test.tscovers traversal, nested symlinks, dangling victims, and valid removals.
Commands run
$ pnpm --filter @pnpm/patching.commands test test/isSubdirectory.test.ts test/patchRemove.test.ts
PASS: 11 tests across 2 suites
$ pnpm --filter @pnpm/patching.commands run compile
PASS
$ git diff --check
PASS
Validation
- Focused handler and path-predicate suites: 11 passed across 2 suites.
- Package-wide ESLint: passed.
- Package TypeScript build: passed.
- Commit hooks, Commitlint, and
git diff --check: passed. - The broader integration harness was environment-blocked because it writes outside the available temporary root; focused handler tests used
/private/tmp.
Patches
10.34.4: https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/commit/352ae489f1b14ffdc19d2c6eacb1b06b098c2ddc
11.7.0: https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/commit/612a2e6a7333f2b061f452a21b6e62c1c161747f
Compatibility
Missing patch files remain no-ops. Valid symlinked patch directories continue to work when their canonical target stays inside the lockfile directory, and final symlinks are removed without touching their targets. patch-remove is not yet in pacquet's command surface, so no Rust-side parity change is required.
Remaining risk
Portable Node APIs do not expose directory-fd-relative unlinkat(). A local attacker who can replace an already validated parent directory before the unlink may still win a time-of-check/time-of-use race. The reproduced repository-controlled traversal and symlink paths do not require that concurrent capability and are blocked by this patch.
Written by an agent (Codex, GPT-5).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | pnpm | all versions | 10.34.4npm install pnpm@10.34.4 |
| 📦npm | pnpm | ≥ 11.0.0&&< 11.7.0 | 11.7.0npm install pnpm@11.7.0 |
Affected Products
pnpmpnpmDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pnpm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pnpm to 10.34.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-59194 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This is an Important flaw in `pnpm` where a crafted patch entry can enable arbitrary file deletion. When the `pnpm patch-remove` command processes such an entry, it may resolve paths outside the intended patches directory, allowing the deletion of arbitrary files. While the primary issue is addressed by validating…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-59194 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-59194 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.