Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f

CRITICAL

Field-level access-control bypass for multiselect field

Also known asCVE-2022-39322
Published
Oct 18, 2022
Updated
Nov 8, 2023
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk60th percentile+0.08%
0.42%0.80%1.18%1.55%0.9%1.1%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

@keystone-6/corenpm
12Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

@keystone-6/[email protected] || 2.3.0 users who are using the multiselect field, and provided field-level access control - are vulnerable to their field-level access control not being used.

List-level access control is NOT affected.

Field-level access control for fields other than multiselect are NOT affected.

Example, you are vulnerable if you are using field-level access control on a multiselect like the following:

const yourList = list({
  access: {
    // this is list-level access control, this is NOT impacted
  },
  fields: {
    yourFieldName: multiselect({
      // this is field-level access control, for multiselect fields
      //   this is vulnerable
      access: {
        create: ({ session }) => session?.data.isAdmin,
        update: ({ session }) => session?.data.isAdmin,
      },
      options: [
        { value: 'apples', label: 'Apples' },
        { value: 'oranges', label: 'Oranges' },
      ],
      // ...
    }),
    // ...
  },
  // ...
});

Mitigation

Please upgrade to @keystone-6/core >= 2.3.1, where this vulnerability has been closed.

Workarounds

If for some reason you cannot upgrade your dependencies, you should stop using the multiselect field.

Credits

Thanks to Marek R for reporting and submitting the pull request to fix this problem.

If you have any questions around this security advisory, please don't hesitate to contact us at [email protected], or open an issue on GitHub.

If you have a security flaw to report for any software in this repository, please see our SECURITY policy.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@keystone-6/core2.2.0&&< 2.3.12.3.1
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @keystone-6/core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update @keystone-6/core to 2.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

#### Impact `@keystone-6/[email protected] || 2.3.0` users who are using the `multiselect` field, and provided field-level access control - are vulnerable to their field-level access control not being used. List-level access control is **NOT** affected. Field-level access control for fields other than `multiselect` are **NOT** affected. Example, **you are vulnerable if** you are using field-level access control on a `multiselect` like the following: ```ts const yourList = list({ access: { // this is list-level access control, this is NOT impacted }, fields: { yourFieldName: multisel
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.