NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

CVE-2025-46720 — @keystone-6/core

LOW

CVE-2025-46720 is a low-severity (CVSS 3.1) Information Exposure vulnerability in @keystone-6/core. A fix is available for @keystone-6/core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Keystone has an unintended `isFilterable` bypass that can be used as an oracle to match hidden fields

Also known asGHSA-hg9m-67mm-7pg3
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 3, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-46720.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs21th percentile — riskier than 21% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.26%0.52%0.78%0.1%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

19other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@keystone-6/corenpm
24Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

{field}.isFilterable access control can be bypassed in update and delete mutations by adding additional unique filters. These filters can be used as an oracle to probe the existence or value of otherwise unreadable fields.

Specifically, when a mutation includes a where clause with multiple unique filters (e.g. id and email), Keystone will attempt to match records even if filtering by the latter fields would normally be rejected by field.isFilterable or list.defaultIsFilterable. This can allow malicious actors to infer the presence of a particular field value when a filter is successful in returning a result.

Impact

This affects any project relying on the default or dynamic isFilterable behaviour (at the list or field level) to prevent external users from using the filtering of fields as a discovery mechanism. While this access control is respected during findMany operations, it was not completely enforced during update and delete mutations when accepting more than one unique where values in filters.

This has no impact on projects using isFilterable: false or defaultIsFilterable: false for sensitive fields, or if you have otherwise omitted filtering by these fields from your GraphQL schema. (See workarounds)

Patches

This issue has been patched in @keystone-6/core version 6.5.0.

Workarounds

To mitigate this issue in older versions where patching is not a viable pathway.

  • Set isFilterable: false statically for relevant fields to prevent filtering by them earlier in the access control pipeline (that is, don't use functions)
  • Set {field}.graphql.omit.read: true for relevant fields, which implicitly removes filtering by these fields your GraphQL schema
  • Deny update and delete operations for the relevant lists completely (e.g list({ access: { operation: { update: false, delete: false } }, ... }))

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@keystone-6/coreall versions6.5.0npm install @keystone-6/core@6.5.0

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
keystonekeystonejs
< 6.5.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @keystone-6/core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @keystone-6/core to 6.5.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-46720 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Summary `{field}.isFilterable` access control can be bypassed in `update` and `delete` mutations by adding additional unique filters. These filters can be used as an oracle to probe the existence or value of otherwise unreadable fields. Specifically, when a mutation includes a `where` clause with multiple unique filters (e.g. `id` and `email`), Keystone will attempt to match records even if filtering by the latter fields would normally be rejected by `field.isFilterable` or `list.defaultIsFilterable`. This can allow malicious actors to infer the presence of a particular field value when a
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-46720 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-46720: @keystone-6/core — Fixed in 6.5.0