Froxlor username/surname AND company field BypassGHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4
HIGHFix: Froxlor/Froxlor@4b18468GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in froxlor/froxlor. 2 public exploit or proof-of-concept references are indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for froxlor/froxlor — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
froxlor/froxlorReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Dear Sirs and Madams,
I would like to report a business logic error vulnerability that I discovered during my recent penetration test on Froxlor.
Specifically, I identified an issue where it was possible to submit the registration form with the essential fields, such as the username and password, left intentionally blank. This inadvertent omission allowed for a bypass of the mandatory field requirements established by the system.
The surname, family name AND company name all of them can be left blank.
I believe addressing this vulnerability is crucial to ensure the security and integrity of the Froxlor platform.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This action served as a means to bypass the mandatory field requirements.
Lets see (please have a look at the Video -> attachment).
as you can see i was able to let the username and second name blank.
Lets see again.
Only the company name is set.
Thank you for your time
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | froxlor/froxlor | all versions | 2.1.2composer require froxlor/froxlor:^2.1.2 |
Affected Products
froxlorfroxlorResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for froxlor/froxlor, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update froxlor/froxlor to 2.1.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.