Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4

HIGH

Froxlor username/surname AND company field Bypass

Also known asCVE-2023-50256
Published
Jan 4, 2024
Updated
Feb 16, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
2 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk49th percentile+0.66%
0.00%0.41%0.81%1.22%0.0%0.7%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐘froxlor/froxlor

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Dear Sirs and Madams,

I would like to report a business logic error vulnerability that I discovered during my recent penetration test on Froxlor.

Specifically, I identified an issue where it was possible to submit the registration form with the essential fields, such as the username and password, left intentionally blank. This inadvertent omission allowed for a bypass of the mandatory field requirements established by the system.

The surname, family name AND company name all of them can be left blank.

I believe addressing this vulnerability is crucial to ensure the security and integrity of the Froxlor platform.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

This action served as a means to bypass the mandatory field requirements.

Lets see (please have a look at the Video -> attachment).


as you can see i was able to let the username and second name blank.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/80028768/289675319-81ae8ebe-1308-4ee3-bedb-43cdc40da474.mp4

Lets see again.

Only the company name is set.

Thank you for your time

Froxlor 2 Froxlor 1

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistfroxlor/froxlorall versions2.1.2
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for froxlor/froxlor. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update froxlor/froxlor to 2.1.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Dear Sirs and Madams, I would like to report a business logic error vulnerability that I discovered during my recent penetration test on Froxlor. Specifically, I identified an issue where it was possible to submit the registration form with the essential fields, such as the username and password, left intentionally blank. This inadvertent omission allowed for a bypass of the mandatory field requirements established by the system. The surname, family name AND company name all of them can be left blank. I believe addressing this vulnerability is crucial to ensure the security and integrity o
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.