Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h

MEDIUMFix: vyperlang/vyper#2914

GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-95 vulnerability in vyper. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

vyper performs multiple eval of `sqrt()` argument built in

Also known asCVE-2024-32649PYSEC-2024-209
Published
Apr 25, 2024
Updated
Jun 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Using the sqrt builtin can result in multiple eval evaluation of side effects when the argument has side-effects. The bug is more difficult (but not impossible!) to trigger as of 0.3.4, when the unique symbol fence was introduced (https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2914).

A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production.

Details

It can be seen that the build_IR function of the sqrt builtin doesn't cache the argument to the stack: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/4595938734d9988f8e46e8df38049ae0559abedb/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L2151

As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack).

PoC

With at least Vyper version 0.2.15+commit.6e7dba7 the following contract:

c: uint256

@internal
def some_decimal() -> decimal:
    self.c += 1
    return 1.0

@external
def foo() -> uint256:
    k: decimal = sqrt(self.some_decimal())
    return self.c

passes the following test:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity >=0.8.13;

import "../../lib/ds-test/test.sol";
import "../../lib/utils/Console.sol";
import "../../lib/utils/VyperDeployer.sol";

import "../ITest.sol";

contract ConTest is DSTest {
    VyperDeployer vyperDeployer = new VyperDeployer();

    ITest t;

    function setUp() public {
        t = ITest(vyperDeployer.deployContract("Test"));
    }

    function testFoo() public {
        uint256 val = t.foo();
        console.log(val);
        assert (val == 4);
    }
}

Patches

Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3976.

Impact

No vulnerable production contracts were found.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyperall versions0.4.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Using the `sqrt` builtin can result in multiple eval evaluation of side effects when the argument has side-effects. The bug is more difficult (but not impossible!) to trigger as of 0.3.4, when the unique symbol fence was introduced (https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2914). A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. ### Details It can be seen that the `build_IR` function of the `sqrt` builtin doesn't cache the argument to the stack: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/4595938734d9988f8e46e8df38049ae0559abedb/vyper/builtins/func
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.