pydantic-settings: NestedSecretsSettingsSource follows symlinks outside secrets_dir, enabling local file read and bypassing secrets_dir_max_sizeGHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
MEDIUMGHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Path Traversal vulnerability in pydantic-settings. A fix is available for pydantic-settings — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
pydantic-settingsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
NestedSecretsSettingsSource reads secret values from files in a configured secrets_dir. When secrets_nested_subdir=True, a directory entry inside secrets_dir that is a symbolic link pointing outside secrets_dir is followed, so files outside the configured directory are read into settings values. The same code path bypasses the documented secrets_dir_max_size protection. An attacker or lower-privileged component able to influence entries in the configured secrets directory (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount) can turn this into an unintended local file read into settings and can defeat the advertised loading-size cap. This report does not claim network reachability by itself.
Details
NestedSecretsSettingsSource performed two passes over secrets_dir using two different, inconsistent directory-traversal implementations:
- The size check in
validate_secrets_path()usedPath.glob('**/*'), which does not descend into a symbolically-linked directory. - The loader in
load_secrets()usedglob.iglob(f'{path}/**/*', recursive=True)followed byread_text(), which does follow symlinked directories and reads through the link target.
Because the two passes disagreed on symlinks, a symlinked directory inside secrets_dir whose target lives elsewhere was invisible to the size accounting (counted as 0 bytes) while still being fully read by the loader. This produces two distinct problems:
- Out-of-tree read (CWE-22 / CWE-59). A symlinked directory (or file) inside
secrets_dirthat resolves outside it is followed, and the external file's contents are loaded into the corresponding settings field. secrets_dir_max_sizebypass (CWE-400). The size check never sees the out-of-tree content, so the documented size cap is neither respected nor able to reject the oversized external file. A related amplification exists for cyclic in-tree symlinks, whichglob.iglob(recursive=True)re-traverses, inflating the size accounting and the number of loaded secrets.
Reproduction
In a clean Linux container, with a secrets_dir containing a symlink secrets/db -> /path/outside and an outside/passwd file of 512 bytes, while secrets_dir_max_size=100:
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_settings import (
BaseSettings,
SettingsConfigDict,
NestedSecretsSettingsSource,
)
class Db(BaseModel):
passwd: str | None = None
class Settings(BaseSettings):
model_config = SettingsConfigDict(
secrets_dir='secrets',
secrets_nested_subdir=True,
secrets_dir_max_size=100, # outside/passwd is 512 bytes
)
db: Db = Db()
@classmethod
def settings_customise_sources(
cls, settings_cls, init_settings, env_settings, dotenv_settings, file_secret_settings
):
return (NestedSecretsSettingsSource(file_secret_settings),)
On affected versions, Settings().db.passwd is populated with the 512-byte out-of-tree file and no SettingsError is raised, even though the file exceeds secrets_dir_max_size.
Impact
Applications that opt into NestedSecretsSettingsSource with secrets_nested_subdir=True and load secrets from a directory whose entries can be influenced by an attacker or a lower-privileged component (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount, or a secrets directory partially populated from untrusted input) are affected. The impact is:
- Confidentiality: files outside the configured
secrets_dircan be read into settings values (local file read). - Integrity / availability of the safeguard: the advertised
secrets_dir_max_sizecap can be bypassed, and cyclic symlinks can inflate resource usage during loading.
The vulnerability requires the ability to place a symbolic link inside the configured secrets directory; it is not remotely reachable on its own. Applications that do not use NestedSecretsSettingsSource, or that point secrets_dir at a directory fully under the application's control, are not affected.
Mitigation
Upgrade to pydantic-settings 2.14.2, which:
- walks the secrets directory explicitly and only descends into directories whose resolved path stays within
secrets_dir, so symlinked directories pointing outside are never followed; - uses a single, cycle-safe iterator for both the size check and the loader, so the size accounting and the loaded set are always consistent and each real directory is visited at most once;
- skips any file whose resolved path escapes
secrets_dir, as defense in depth.
If upgrading is not immediately possible, ensure the configured secrets_dir is fully owned and controlled by the application (no writable or attacker-influenced entries), or avoid secrets_nested_subdir=True.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pydantic-settings | ≥ 2.12.0&&< 2.14.2 | 2.14.2pip install --upgrade 'pydantic-settings==2.14.2' |
Affected Products
pydantic-settingspydanticDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pydantic-settings, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pydantic-settings to 2.14.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Moderate: This flaw in `pydantic-settings` allows for local file disclosure and bypass of size restrictions when `NestedSecretsSettingsSource` is used with `secrets_nested_subdir=True` and an attacker can influence entries in the configured `secrets_dir`. This is due to inconsistent directory traversal implementations…
To mitigate this issue, ensure that the `secrets_dir` used by `pydantic-settings` with `NestedSecretsSettingsSource` is exclusively controlled by the application, preventing any unauthorized modifications or symlink placements. Alternatively, disable the `secrets_nested_subdir=True` option if nested secret subdirectories are not essential for your application's functionality.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1790621718 | RHSA-2026:73929 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1790621713 | RHSA-2026:73930 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.