NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

vyper performs double eval of raw_args in create_from_blueprintGHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6

MEDIUM

GHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-95 vulnerability in vyper. A fix is available for vyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2024-32647PYSEC-2024-208
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk-0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs40th percentile — riskier than 40% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.39%0.77%1.16%0.5%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Using the create_from_blueprint builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when raw_args=True and the args argument has side-effects.

A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. In particular, the raw_args variant of create_from_blueprint was not found to be used in production.

Details

It can be seen that the _build_create_IR function of the create_from_blueprint builtin doesn't cache the mentioned args argument to the stack: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/cedf7087e68e67c7bfbd47ae95dcb16b81ad2e02/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L1847

As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack).

PoC

The vulnerability is demonstrated in the following boa test:

src1 = """
c: uint256
"""
deployer = """
created_address: public(address)
deployed: public(uint256)

@external
def get() -> Bytes[32]:
    self.deployed += 1
    return b''

@external
def create_(target: address):
    self.created_address = create_from_blueprint(target, raw_call(self, method_id("get()"), max_outsize=32), raw_args=True, code_offset=3)
"""

Factory = b.loads_partial(src1)
c = Factory.deploy_as_blueprint()

c2 = b.loads(deployer, b'')
c2.create_(c)
c2.deployed()

The output of c2.deployed() is 2 although create_ was called only once and the value was initialized to 0.

Patches

Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3976.

Impact

No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyperall versions0.4.0pip install --upgrade 'vyper==0.4.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
vypervyperlang
< 0.4.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Using the `create_from_blueprint` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when `raw_args=True` and the `args` argument has side-effects. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. In particular, the `raw_args` variant of `create_from_blueprint` was not found to be used in production. ### Details It can be seen that the `_build_create_IR` function of the `create_from_blueprint` builtin doesn't cache the mentioned `args` argument to the stack: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/cedf7087e68e67c7bfbd47ae95dcb16b81ad2e02/vyper
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

GHSA-3whq-64q2-qfj6: vyper — Fixed in 0.4.0