NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

Chainlit contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilityGHSA-2g59-m95p-pgfq

HIGHFix: Chainlit/chainlit@ffc3cce

GHSA-2g59-m95p-pgfq is a high-severity (CVSS 7.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in chainlit. A fix is available for chainlit — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-22219PYSEC-2026-1237
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2g59-m95p-pgfq.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
5.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs93th percentile — riskier than 93% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%2.24%4.48%6.71%0.0%5.2%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍chainlit

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Chainlit versions prior to 2.9.4 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /project/element update flow when configured with the SQLAlchemy data layer backend. An authenticated client can provide a user-controlled url value in an Element, which is fetched by the SQLAlchemy element creation logic using an outbound HTTP GET request. This allows an attacker to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the Chainlit server to internal network services or cloud metadata endpoints and store the retrieved responses via the configured storage provider.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIchainlitall versions2.9.4pip install --upgrade 'chainlit==2.9.4'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
chainlitchainlit
< 2.9.4
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for chainlit, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update chainlit to 2.9.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2g59-m95p-pgfq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Frequently Asked Questions

Chainlit versions prior to 2.9.4 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /project/element update flow when configured with the SQLAlchemy data layer backend. An authenticated client can provide a user-controlled url value in an Element, which is fetched by the SQLAlchemy element creation logic using an outbound HTTP GET request. This allows an attacker to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the Chainlit server to internal network services or cloud metadata endpoints and store the retrieved responses via the configured storage provider.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2g59-m95p-pgfq in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Chainlit contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF)…