Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-2933-q333-qg83

CRITICALFix: i18next/i18next-fs-backend@3ab0448

GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) CWE-1321 vulnerability in i18next-fs-backend. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

i18next-fs-backend vulnerable to prototype pollution via crafted missing-key string

Also known asCVE-2026-48713
Published
Jun 25, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2933-q333-qg83.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs35th percentile — riskier than 35% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.31%0.61%0.92%0.4%0.4%0.4%Jul 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 358,265 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

241other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
i18next-fs-backendnpm
1.2Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

i18next-fs-backend ≤ 2.6.5, when used to persist missing translation keys (e.g. via i18next-http-middleware's missingKeyHandler exposed to untrusted input), is vulnerable to prototype pollution via crafted missing-key strings.

Backend.writeFile() splits each queued missing-key string on the configured keySeparator (default .) before calling the internal setPath() walker. The walker (getLastOfPath in lib/utils.js) did not guard against unsafe segments, so a key like "__proto__.polluted" was split into ["__proto__", "polluted"] and walked straight into Object.prototype, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary properties onto the global object prototype.

Depending on the host application, polluted prototype properties may cause crashes, corrupted translation behaviour, configuration poisoning, or bypasses of property-based security checks.

Affected configuration

Applications are directly affected only if all of the following hold:

  • i18next-fs-backend ≤ 2.6.5 is configured as the backend.
  • i18next-http-middleware's missingKeyHandler (or another route that forwards untrusted request bodies to i18next.t(..., { ... }) with saveMissing: true) is reachable by untrusted users.
  • The default behaviour of splitting missing-key strings on keySeparator is in use (i.e. keySeparator is not false).

Apps that do not expose missing-key persistence to untrusted input are not directly affected through this attack path.

Patches

Fixed in i18next-fs-backend 2.6.6. The traversal helper now refuses to descend through __proto__, constructor, or prototype segments and drops the offending write silently. Legitimate dotted keys (e.g. "header.title") are unaffected.

A matching defence-in-depth fix has been shipped in i18next-http-middleware 3.9.7 — see the companion advisory.

Workarounds

If users cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Do not expose i18next-http-middleware's missingKeyHandler to untrusted users (mount it behind authentication, or remove the route).
  • Disable missing-key persistence (saveMissing: false, or no backend.create implementation) when accepting writes from untrusted input.
  • Set keySeparator: false in the i18next options to disable backend key splitting (note: this also disables nested translation keys).

Resources

  • Original report by @codeswhite.
  • Companion advisory in i18next-http-middleware: GHSA-f49m-vf83-692w.
  • Previous i18next-fs-backend security release: GHSA-8847-338w-5hcj (path traversal via lng/ns, fixed in 2.6.4).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmi18next-fs-backendall versions2.6.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for i18next-fs-backend. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update i18next-fs-backend to 2.6.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-2933-q333-qg83. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact `i18next-fs-backend` ≤ 2.6.5, when used to persist missing translation keys (e.g. via `i18next-http-middleware`'s `missingKeyHandler` exposed to untrusted input), is vulnerable to prototype pollution via crafted missing-key strings. `Backend.writeFile()` splits each queued missing-key string on the configured `keySeparator` (default `.`) before calling the internal `setPath()` walker. The walker (`getLastOfPath` in `lib/utils.js`) did not guard against unsafe segments, so a key like `"__proto__.polluted"` was split into `["__proto__", "polluted"]` and walked straight into `Object.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-2933-q333-qg83 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-2933-q333-qg83: i18next-fs-backend… | O3 Security