CVE-2026-55766 — psr7
MEDIUMCVE-2026-55766 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-93 vulnerability in guzzlehttp/psr7. A fix is available for guzzlehttp/psr7 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
guzzlehttp/psr7: CRLF Injection in HTTP Start-Line Serialization
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-55766.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-55766 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,415 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
guzzlehttp/psr7Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
guzzlehttp/psr7 did not reject CR/LF characters in certain first-party HTTP start-line fields: the request method, protocol version, and response reason phrase. If an application placed attacker-controlled data into one of those fields and later serialized the PSR-7 message as raw HTTP/1.x, for example with Message::toString() or an equivalent serializer, the serialized message could contain attacker-controlled header lines. The issue can also be reached through Message::parseRequest() or Message::parseResponse() when malformed raw messages are parsed into first-party PSR-7 objects and then serialized again.
Creating or modifying a Request, Response, or other PSR-7 object alone is not sufficient. The issue requires the malformed message to be serialized and written to the network, forwarded, replayed, or otherwise processed by software that does not independently reject the malformed start line. This is not the normal request-sending path used by guzzlehttp/guzzle; applications using guzzlehttp/psr7 only through Guzzle's standard HTTP client APIs are not expected to be affected.
Applications are most likely to be affected when they manually serialize PSR-7 messages, forward raw HTTP messages, or use custom transports, proxying, crawling, webhook delivery, testing, or similar code. Depending on how downstream HTTP/1.1 components parse the serialized message, this may lead to header injection, response splitting, request smuggling, or cache poisoning.
Patches
The issue is patched in 2.12.1 and later. Starting in that release, guzzlehttp/psr7 rejects CR/LF characters in HTTP method, protocol version, and response reason phrase values before storing them in first-party message objects.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, reject CR/LF in untrusted method, protocol version, and reason phrase values before constructing or modifying PSR-7 messages.
Applications that parse, forward, replay, or serialize raw HTTP messages cannot work around the parser entry points by validating only after parsing. They should validate the raw start line before calling Message::parseRequest() or Message::parseResponse(), avoid reparsing untrusted raw messages, or upgrade. If an application runs with attacker-controlled synthetic $_SERVER values, validate REQUEST_METHOD and SERVER_PROTOCOL before calling ServerRequest::fromGlobals().
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | guzzlehttp/psr7 | all versions | 2.12.1composer require guzzlehttp/psr7:^2.12.1 |
Affected Products
psr-7guzzlephpDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for guzzlehttp/psr7, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update guzzlehttp/psr7 to 2.12.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55766 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-55766 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.