Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-55164 — lemur

MEDIUMFix: Netflix/lemur@221c6d7

CVE-2026-55164 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.9) CWE-256 vulnerability in lemur. A fix is available for lemur — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Lemur: Plaintext password storage in Lemur user-update path

Also known asGHSA-q437-g7fv-2jvvPYSEC-2026-2587
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-55164.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs20th percentile — riskier than 20% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.26%0.53%0.79%0.2%0.3%0.3%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-55164 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍lemur

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

lemur.users.service.update() writes a user's new password as plaintext to the users.password column. The User model wires bcrypt hashing to SQLAlchemy's before_insert event but registers no equivalent listener for before_update, and service.update() does not call user.hash_password() after assigning the new value. Every password change performed through the admin-gated PUT /api/1/users/<id> endpoint persists the user's password to the database in cleartext.

Root Cause

lemur/users/models.py:

# line 38
class User(BaseModel):
    __tablename__ = "users"
    id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
    password = Column(String(128))            # plain column, no setter, no Vault descriptor

# line 74
    def hash_password(self):
        if self.password:
            self.password = bcrypt.generate_password_hash(self.password).decode("utf-8")

# line 111
listen(User, "before_insert", hash_password)  # only before_insert is wired

lemur/users/service.py:

# line 46
def update(user_id, username, email, active, profile_picture, roles, password=None):
    ...
    user = get(user_id)
    user.username = username
    user.email = email
    user.active = active
    user.profile_picture = profile_picture
    if password:
        user.password = password              # raw assignment
    update_roles(user, roles)
    return database.update(user)              # commits, no hashing

No before_update listener exists. User.password is a plain Column(String(128)) with no property setter that hashes on assignment. The bcrypt code path is bypassed entirely on every UPDATE statement that touches this column.

Affected Endpoints

MethodPathSource
PUT/api/1/users/<id>lemur/users/views.py:274 (gated by @admin_permission.require)

lemur/auth/views.py:323 also calls user_service.update() during SSO/OAuth login, but passes only six positional arguments. password defaults to None on that path and the if password: guard short-circuits. The bug is triggered only through the admin-only PUT handler.

Impact

When an administrator changes a user's password via PUT /api/1/users/<id>, the cleartext password is persisted to users.password. Subsequent login attempts for that user will fail (check_password calls bcrypt.check_password_hash against an unhashed value), pushing operators toward workarounds.

The more serious consequence is a defense-in-depth bypass. Bcrypt is the protection that prevents a database compromise from yielding usable credentials. With plaintext rows present, an attacker who exfiltrates the users table, a backup, a read replica, or query logs obtains directly usable login credentials — no offline cracking required. Because users reuse passwords across services, the blast radius extends beyond Lemur.

The bug specifically affects admin-driven password resets, which are the normal post-incident workflow and exactly when plaintext storage is most harmful.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Install Lemur with default config. Create an admin user and a target user 'alice' (created via the standard flow, password will be hashed correctly on insert).

  2. Verify the initial hash: psql lemur -c "SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='alice';"

    Output: $2b$12$N9Q... (bcrypt hash, as expected)

  3. As admin, change alice's password via the API: curl -X PUT https://lemur.local/api/1/users/<alice_id>
    -H "Authorization: Bearer <admin_jwt>"
    -H "Content-Type: application/json"
    -d '{ "username": "alice", "email": "[email protected]", "active": true, "profile_picture": null, "roles": [{"name": "operator"}], "password": "ProofOfConcept_2026" }'

  4. Read the column again: psql lemur -c "SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='alice';"

    Output: ProofOfConcept_2026 ← plaintext, not hashed

  5. Confirm the failure mode: 'alice' can no longer log in with 'ProofOfConcept_2026' because check_password runs bcrypt.check_password_hash() against the cleartext column.

Remediation

Register the listener for both events:

# lemur/users/models.py
listen(User, "before_insert", hash_password)
listen(User, "before_update", hash_password)

Alternative, equivalent fix in the service layer:

# lemur/users/service.py, in update()
    if password:
        user.password = password
        user.hash_password()

The listener fix is preferred because it closes the gap for any future code path that mutates user.password.

A one-time migration is recommended to detect and re-hash any rows already stored in cleartext. Bcrypt hashes begin with $2b$, $2a$, or $2y$. Any cleartext credential should be treated as compromised — rotate it, do not just re-hash it — since it has been at rest in plaintext and may exist in backups, audit logs, and replicas.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlemurall versions1.9.2pip install --upgrade 'lemur==1.9.2'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for lemur, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update lemur to 1.9.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55164 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `lemur.users.service.update()` writes a user's new password as plaintext to the `users.password` column. The `User` model wires bcrypt hashing to SQLAlchemy's `before_insert` event but registers no equivalent listener for `before_update`, and `service.update()` does not call `user.hash_password()` after assigning the new value. Every password change performed through the admin-gated `PUT /api/1/users/<id>` endpoint persists the user's password to the database in cleartext. ## Root Cause `lemur/users/models.py`: ```python # line 38 class User(BaseModel): __tablename__ = "user
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-55164 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-55164: lemur — Fixed in 1.9.2