CVE-2026-70667 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.3) CWE-367 vulnerability in lemur. A fix is available for lemur — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Lemur: SSRF protection in certificate revocation checking bypassable via HTTP redirects and DNS rebinding (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-55162)
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-70667 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 382,205 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
lemurReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The SSRF mitigation added for GHSA-54vg-pfh7-jq95 (_validate_revocation_url() in lemur /certificates/verify.py) can be bypassed. An operator-role user who uploads a certificate with attacker-controlled CRL/OCSP extensions can still make Lemur reach internal destinations (RFC1918, loopback, link-local 169.254.169.254) during verification.
Affected version
Tested against main (the commit that introduced _validate_revocation_url). The 1.9.2 release predates that guard and is vulnerable to the original SSRF (GHSA-54vg-pfh7-jq95) directly; this bypass applies to the unreleased mitigation in main. Please map the affected range to whichever release will first contain _validate_revocation_url.
Bypass 1 — HTTP redirect (deterministic)
The guard validates only the URL in the certificate; the CRL fetch then follows redirects without re-validating the target:
# lemur/certificates/verify.py:174
response = requests.get(point, timeout=(3.05, 6))
The attacker hosts the CRL URL on a public host they control (passes the guard); that host returns 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/.... requests follows it to the internal target the guard never inspected.
Bypass 2 — DNS rebinding / TOCTOU (probabilistic)
The guard resolves once during validation; the fetch re-resolves independently:
# lemur/certificates/verify.py:51
addr = ipaddress.ip_address(socket.gethostbyname(hostname))
A low-TTL attacker name that answers a public IP at check time and an internal IP at fetch time passes the guard but is fetched internally. Same gap affects the OCSP path (openssl ocsp -url <url>, verify.py:90-99).
Relationship to GHSA-54vg-pfh7-jq95
Incomplete-fix of that mitigation, not a duplicate. Bypass 1 is not mentioned there; bypass 2 is the rebinding gap that advisory's remediation text anticipated ("pins the resolved IP") but the code does not implement.
Affected endpoint
POST /api/1/certificates/upload (operator role) → verify_string → crl_verify / ocsp_verify. Triggered when verification runs (e.g. the check_revocation task).
PoC
- Generate a cert with
crlDistributionPoints = URI:http://attacker.example/crl. - That host returns
302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/...(bypass 1), or use a low-TTL rebinding name (bypass 2). - Upload via
POST /api/1/certificates/uploadas an operator user. - Trigger
lemur certificate check_revocation. - Observe the request reach the internal address (
tcpdump -nni any host 169.254.169.254).
Impact
Blind SSRF from the Lemur host: reach internal services and instance metadata (169.254.169.254 without IMDSv2). Response is parsed as a CRL and discarded — reachability/side-effects, not response exfiltration.
Remediation
allow_redirects=Falseon CRL fetches (or re-validate every redirect hop).- Resolve once, pin the IP, connect to the pinned address; route the OCSP URL through the same check.
- Reject names with any internal A/AAAA record.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | lemur | all versions | 1.9.3pip install --upgrade 'lemur==1.9.3' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for lemur, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update lemur to 1.9.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-70667 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-70667 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.