CVE-2026-71417 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) CWE-639 vulnerability in lemur. A fix is available for lemur — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Lemur: Any user can revoke arbitrary certificates at the CA by uploading a duplicate record and revoking it
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-71417.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-71417 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 382,205 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
lemurReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur
PUT /api/1/certificates/<id>/revoke authorizes the caller against the Lemur database row (creator == current user, or CertificatePermission over the row's roles) rather than the underlying CA-side certificate identity. Separately, POST /api/1/certificates/upload lets any user passing StrictRolePermission create a new Certificate row while freely supplying body, authority (resolved by id/name with no AuthorityPermission check) and external_id; there is no uniqueness constraint on body, serial, or external_id.
An attacker can therefore read a target certificate's public body, authority.id, and external_id via GET /certificates/<id>, upload a duplicate row, and revoke that duplicate. The creator-bypass skips CertificatePermission, the empty-endpoints check passes because the duplicate has none, and service.revoke() then revokes at the CA using the attacker-supplied body (ACME) or external_id (DigiCert/Entrust/Google CA/CFSSL) under the authority's stored CA credentials — revoking the real production certificate.
Affected route
POST /api/1/certificates/upload → PUT /api/1/certificates/<dup_id>/revoke
Affected code
lemur/certificates/views.py:651— onlyStrictRolePermission().can()gates upload; noAuthorityPermissionchecklemur/certificates/schemas.py:391—CertificateUploadInputSchemaaccepts caller-suppliedauthorityandexternal_idlemur/schemas.py:107—AssociatedAuthoritySchemaresolves any authority by id/name with no permission checklemur/certificates/service.py:489—upload()binds the caller-supplied authority onto the new rowlemur/certificates/models.py:119— onlynameis unique;body/serial/external_idare not, andget_or_increase_name()auto-suffixes on collisionlemur/certificates/views.py:1677—if g.current_user != cert.user: ... CertificatePermission ...— creator of the duplicate row bypasses the owner checklemur/certificates/views.py:1687—if cert.endpoints: ...— duplicate row has no endpoints, so the deployed-cert safeguard is bypassedlemur/certificates/service.py:1120—plugin = plugins.get(certificate.authority.plugin_name); plugin.revoke_certificate(certificate, reason)lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handlers.py:268— ACME revokes bycertificate.bodylemur/plugins/lemur_digicert/plugin.py:477,lemur/plugins/lemur_entrust/plugin.py:321— commercial CAs revoke bycertificate.external_idlemur/certificates/schemas.py:290—CertificateOutputSchemaexposesexternal_id,body,authorityto any authenticated user
Impact
A low-privileged authenticated insider (or holder of a stolen non-admin token/API key) can revoke any certificate managed by Lemur — including high-value certificates they do not own and certificates currently attached to live endpoints — directly at the issuing CA. Iterating over GET /certificates yields fleet-wide revocation (mass DoS of TLS endpoints) without ever passing an AuthorityPermission or CertificatePermission check on the victim certificate. This is exactly the "Revocation as DoS vector" scenario flagged in the threat model and additionally defeats the built-in "cannot revoke while attached to endpoint" safeguard.
Root cause
Revocation authority is bound to ownership of the Lemur DB row, not to the CA-side certificate identity. Because upload allows creating a second row that aliases the same CA-side certificate (same body / external_id / authority) without any uniqueness constraint or AuthorityPermission check, the attacker can manufacture a row they own and then exercise the creator-bypass on revoke. The endpoint-attached guard inspects only the duplicate row's cert.endpoints, which is empty.
Validated evidence
Static path trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):
- Upload is gated only by
StrictRolePermission(default-open to any non-read-only user) and accepts attacker-chosenauthority+external_id+bodywithout anAuthorityPermissioncheck. Certificate.body/external_idhave no uniqueness constraint, so a duplicate row is created.- The revoke endpoint short-circuits the owner check when caller is the row creator, and the endpoint-attached guard inspects only the duplicate row.
- Issuer plugins revoke at the CA using
body/external_idtaken from the duplicate row under the authority's stored CA credentials.
Proof of concept / reproducer
Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA — revoking at a real CA is destructive).
Preconditions: attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only. <VICTIM_CERT_ID> is any certificate id readable via GET /api/1/certificates.
# 1. Read the victim's body / authority / external_id (exposed to any authenticated user)
curl -sS "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/<VICTIM_CERT_ID>" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
| jq '{body, external_id, authority: .authority.id}'
# 2. Upload a duplicate row aliasing the same CA-side certificate
curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/upload" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "victim-dup",
"owner": "[email protected]",
"body": "<VICTIM_BODY_PEM>",
"authority": {"id": <VICTIM_AUTHORITY_ID>},
"externalId": "<VICTIM_EXTERNAL_ID>"
}'
# → returns {"id": <DUP_ID>, ...}; attacker is now cert.user of <DUP_ID>
# 3. Revoke the duplicate — issuer plugin revokes at the CA by body/external_id
curl -sS -X PUT "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/<DUP_ID>/revoke" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"crlReason": "unspecified"}'
Static-trace validation command from the source report:
grep -n 'StrictRolePermission' lemur/certificates/views.py | grep -v Authority
grep -n 'cert.authority = kwargs.get' lemur/certificates/service.py
grep -n 'g.current_user != cert.user' lemur/certificates/views.py
grep -n 'certificate.external_id\|certificate.body' \
lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handlers.py \
lemur/plugins/lemur_digicert/plugin.py \
lemur/plugins/lemur_entrust/plugin.py
Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_050, finding cluster lemur-revoke-via-duplicate, 2/100 runs).
Suggested fix
Decouple CA-side revocation authority from Lemur row ownership:
- On
POST /certificates/upload, ifauthorityis supplied enforceAuthorityPermissionfor that authority, and reject/ignore caller-suppliedexternal_id. - Before calling
plugin.revoke_certificate, look up allCertificaterows sharing the same(authority_id, serial)orbodyand requireCertificatePermissionon every match (and run the endpoint-attached check against all matches). - Consider a DB uniqueness constraint or dedup on
(authority_id, serial)so a second row for the same CA-issued certificate cannot be created. - Stop exposing
external_idinCertificateOutputSchemato non-owners.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | lemur | all versions | 1.9.3pip install --upgrade 'lemur==1.9.3' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for lemur, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update lemur to 1.9.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-71417 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-71417 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.