NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-4800 — lodash

HIGHFix: lodash/lodash@3469357

CVE-2026-4800 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Code Injection vulnerability in lodash. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for lodash — see the affected versions and patch details below.

lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names

Also known asGHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc
Published
Updated
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
4 / 4
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-4800.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
2.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs87th percentile — riskier than 87% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%1.21%2.42%3.64%0.0%2.8%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

4 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

197Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
lodashnpm
204.9Mdownloads / week
lodash-esnpm
70.5Mdownloads / week
lodash-amdnpm
9Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink.

When an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.

Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function().

Patches

Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0.

The fix applies two changes:

  1. Validate importsKeys against the existing reForbiddenIdentifierChars regex (same check already used for the variable option)
  2. Replace assignInWith with assignWith when merging imports, so only own properties are enumerated

Workarounds

Do not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.

Affected Packages

4 total 4 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmlodash≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.18.04.18.0npm install lodash@4.18.0
📦npmlodash-es≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.18.04.18.0npm install lodash-es@4.18.0
📦npmlodash-amd≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.18.04.18.0npm install lodash-amd@4.18.0
📦npmlodash.template≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.18.04.18.0npm install lodash.template@4.18.0

Affected Products

4 products · 4 configurations
Application
lodashlodash
≥ 4.0.0 && < 4.18.0
range
Application
lodash-amdlodash
≥ 4.0.0 && < 4.18.0
range
Application
lodash-eslodash
≥ 4.0.0 && < 4.18.0
range
Application
lodash.templatelodash
≥ 4.0.0 && < 4.18.0
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for lodash, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update lodash to 4.18.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-4800 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

In the context of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the grafana and grafana-pcp packages execute the affected JavaScript entirely client-side within the user's browser. Consequently, the attack surface is strictly restricted to the local browser environment.

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-4800 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9cryostat/cryostat-openshift-console-plugin-rhel9:4.2.0-9RHSA-2026:17789
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8automation-gateway-0:2.5.20260715-1.el8apRHSA-2026:42078
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9automation-platform-ui-0:2.6.9-1.el9apRHSA-2026:24762
Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1lodashRHSA-2026:22619
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10pcs-0:0.12.1-1.el10_1.3RHSA-2026:10713
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10cockpit-0:356.1-1.el10_2RHBA-2026:21388
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10pcs-0:0.12.2-3.el10_2.1RHSA-2026:19008
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10cockpit-image-builder-0:94.3-1.el10_2RHSA-2026:24331

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The fix for [CVE-2021-23337](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the `variable` option in `_.template` but did not apply the same validation to `options.imports` key names. Both paths flow into the same `Function()` constructor sink. When an application passes untrusted input as `options.imports` key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time. Additionally, `_.template` uses `assignInWith` to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via `for..in`. If `Object.p
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-4800 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-4800: lodash RCE — Fixed in 4.18.0