NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-44523 — backend

CRITICALFix: enchant97/note-mark@18b5877

CVE-2026-44523 is a critical-severity (CVSS 10) CWE-326 vulnerability in github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend. A fix is available for github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Note Mark: JWT Secret Weakness allows Full Account Takeover via token forgery

Also known asGHSA-q6mh-rqwh-g786GO-2026-5567
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44523.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs4th percentile — riskier than 4% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.22%0.44%0.66%0.0%0.1%Jun 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

No minimum length or entropy is enforced on the JWT_SECRET configuration value. The application accepts any base64-decodable secret regardless of size, including secrets as short as 1 byte.

HS256 secrets below 32 bytes are brute-forceable offline, allowing attackers to recover the signing key and forge valid JWTs for arbitrary users.


Impact

An attacker who captures a single valid JWT (e.g, from cookies, logs, or network traffic) can:

> Crack the signing secret offline using brute-force or wordlist attacks > Forge valid JWTs for any user ID (including administrators) > Authenticate without knowing any credentials

This results in full account takeover across the entire application with no server-side detection or rate limiting possible.


Details

In backend/config/utils.go, the Base64Decoded.UnmarshalText function decodes the JWT secret but does not validate its length or entropy.

In backend/core/auth.go, JWT tokens are signed using HS256 without enforcing minimum key size requirements.

According to RFC 7518 Section 3.2, HS256 keys must be at least 256 bits (32 bytes). Libraries such as PyJWT explicitly warn against shorter keys, but note-mark performs no such validation.


PoC

1- Deploy note-mark with a weak secret:

JWT_SECRET = base64("testsecret123456789012345")

2- Register an account and capture the Auth-Session-Token cookie

3- Crack the secret offline (example using Python):

import jwt, base64
jwt.decode(TOKEN, base64.b64decode(SECRET), algorithms=["HS256"])

4- Forge a new token for any user UUID with extended expiry

5- Send the forged token in requests → server returns 200 Ok and authenticates as that user


Reproduction Steps

1- Deploy the application with a JWT secret shorter than 32 bytes (after base64 decoding) 2- Authenticate and capture a valid JWT 3- Perform offline brute-force or dictionary attack against the token signature 4- Recover the secret 5- Generate a forged JWT for another user 6- Use the forged token to access protected endpoints


Fix Recommendation

  • Enforce a minimum of 32 bytes (256 bits) for JWT secrets after base64 decoding
  • Reject weak secrets during configuration parsing (e.g., in Base64Decoded.UnmarshalText or config validation)
  • Optionally log warnings or fail startup if the secret is insecure

Resources

  • RFC 7518 Section 3.2 (JSON Web Algorithms - HMAC key size requirements)
  • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength
  • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/enchant97/note-mark/backendall versions0.0.0-20260501152247-18b587758667go get github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend@v0.0.0-20260501152247-18b587758667

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend to 0.0.0-20260501152247-18b587758667 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44523 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

#### Summary No minimum length or entropy is enforced on the `JWT_SECRET` configuration value. The application accepts any base64-decodable secret regardless of size, including secrets as short as 1 byte. HS256 secrets below 32 bytes are brute-forceable offline, allowing attackers to recover the signing key and forge valid JWTs for arbitrary users. --- #### Impact An attacker who captures a single valid JWT (e.g, from cookies, logs, or network traffic) can: \> Crack the signing secret offline using brute-force or wordlist attacks \> Forge valid JWTs for any user ID (including administrat
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-44523 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-44523: backend — Fix Available