NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

CVE-2026-40263 — backend

LOWFix: enchant97/note-mark@cf4c6f6

CVE-2026-40263 is a low-severity (CVSS 3.7) CWE-208 vulnerability in github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend. A fix is available for github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Note Mark: Username Enumeration via Login Endpoint Timing Side-Channel

Also known asGHSA-w6m9-39cv-2fwpGO-2026-5696
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-40263.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs18th percentile — riskier than 18% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.54%0.81%0.0%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A timing side-channel in the login endpoint allows unauthenticated attackers to determine whether a username exists by measuring response time differences. Requests for valid usernames take noticeably longer because the server performs bcrypt password verification, while requests for nonexistent usernames return much faster. This enables reliable remote username enumeration and increases the risk of targeted credential attacks.

Details

The issue affects the login endpoint:

  • POST /api/auth/token

The root cause is that authentication processing takes different code paths depending on whether the supplied username exists. When the username is found, the server performs bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword, which adds substantial latency. When the username does not exist, the server returns immediately without performing an equivalent bcrypt operation.

Vulnerable flow:

user, err := db.Where("username = ?", username).First(&user)
if err != nil {
    return ErrUnauthorized
}
err = bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(user.PasswordHash, []byte(password))

This creates a measurable timing discrepancy between:

  • existing username + wrong password requests, which incur bcrypt cost
  • nonexistent username + any password requests, which avoid bcrypt entirely

Because no constant-time equalization is performed, the endpoint leaks account existence through timing behavior.

The measurements provided show a large and consistent gap between the two cases across repeated trials, making the difference distinguishable without requiring especially high request volume. In the supplied test results:

  • existing user requests averaged about 0.0616s
  • nonexistent user requests averaged about 0.0027s

That gap is large enough to support reliable username enumeration under typical testing conditions.

PoC

The issue can be reproduced by sending repeated authentication attempts to the login endpoint using the same invalid password while alternating between a known valid username and a nonexistent username, then comparing average response times. Valid usernames consistently take longer because bcrypt verification is performed.

Impact

  • Type: Timing side-channel / username enumeration
  • Who is impacted: Any deployment exposing the affected login endpoint
  • Security impact: Unauthenticated attackers can confirm valid usernames one at a time, improving the effectiveness of credential stuffing, password spraying, phishing, and other targeted account attacks
  • Attack preconditions: None beyond network access to the login endpoint
  • Confidentiality impact: Low to moderate, depending on the sensitivity of account existence in the target environment

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/enchant97/note-mark/backendall versions0.19.2-0.20260411145025-cf4c6f6acf70go get github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend@v0.19.2-0.20260411145025-cf4c6f6acf70

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend to 0.19.2-0.20260411145025-cf4c6f6acf70 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-40263 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A timing side-channel in the login endpoint allows unauthenticated attackers to determine whether a username exists by measuring response time differences. Requests for valid usernames take noticeably longer because the server performs bcrypt password verification, while requests for nonexistent usernames return much faster. This enables reliable remote username enumeration and increases the risk of targeted credential attacks. ### Details The issue affects the login endpoint: - `POST /api/auth/token` The root cause is that authentication processing takes different code paths de
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-40263 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-40263: backend — Fix Available