CVE-2026-42584 — netty-codec-http
HIGHCVE-2026-42584 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) CWE-444 vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http. A fix is available for io.netty:netty-codec-http — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Netty: HttpClientCodec response desynchronization
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-42584.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-42584 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
io.netty:netty-codec-http☕io.netty:netty-codec-httpReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
If HttpClientCodec is configured, there are use cases when a response body from one request, can be parsed as another's.
Details
HttpClientCodec pairs each inbound response with an outbound request by queue.poll() once per response, including for 1xx. If the client pipelines GET then HEAD and the server sends 103, then 200 with GET body, then 200 for HEAD, the queue pairs HEAD with the first 200. The HEAD rule then skips reading that message’s body, so the GET entity bytes stay on the stream and the following 200 is parsed from the wrong offset.
Prerequisites
- HTTP/1.1 pipelining
- HEAD in the pipeline
- The server sends 1xx
PoC
@Test
public void test() {
EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpClientCodec());
assertTrue(channel.writeOutbound(new DefaultFullHttpRequest(HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpMethod.GET, "/1")));
ByteBuf request = channel.readOutbound();
request.release();
assertNull(channel.readOutbound());
assertTrue(channel.writeOutbound(new DefaultFullHttpRequest(HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpMethod.HEAD, "/2")));
request = channel.readOutbound();
request.release();
assertNull(channel.readOutbound());
String responseStr = "HTTP/1.1 103 Early Hints\r\n\r\n" +
"HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nContent-Length: 5\r\n\r\nhello" +
"HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\n\r\n";
assertTrue(channel.writeInbound(Unpooled.copiedBuffer(responseStr, CharsetUtil.US_ASCII)));
// Response 1
HttpResponse response = channel.readInbound();
assertEquals(HttpResponseStatus.EARLY_HINTS, response.status());
LastHttpContent last = channel.readInbound();
assertEquals(0, last.content().readableBytes());
last.release();
// Response 2
response = channel.readInbound();
assertEquals(HttpResponseStatus.OK, response.status());
last = channel.readInbound();
assertEquals(0, last.content().readableBytes());
last.release();
// Response 3
FullHttpResponse response1 = channel.readInbound();
assertTrue(response1.decoderResult().isFailure());
assertEquals(0, response1.content().readableBytes());
response1.release();
assertFalse(channel.finish());
}
Impact
Integrity/availability of HTTP parsing on that connection, unsafe reuse of the socket.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | io.netty:netty-codec-http | ≥ 4.2.0.Alpha1&&< 4.2.13.Final | 4.2.13.Finalio.netty:netty-codec-http:4.2.13.Final |
| ☕Maven | io.netty:netty-codec-http | all versions | 4.1.133.Finalio.netty:netty-codec-http:4.1.133.Final |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.netty:netty-codec-http, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update io.netty:netty-codec-http to 4.2.13.Final or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-42584 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-42584 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-42584. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Important: A flaw in Netty's HttpClientCodec allows a remote attacker to cause data confusion. By sending a specially crafted sequence of HTTP responses, an attacker can cause subsequent HTTP responses to be parsed incorrectly, potentially leading to information disclosure or data integrity issues in applications…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 | cryostat/cryostat-reports-rhel9:4.2.0-10 | RHSA-2026:28010 |
| Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 | netty-codec-http | RHSA-2026:66545 |
| Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 | netty-codec-http | RHSA-2026:66488 |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16 | netty-codec-http | RHSA-2026:37390 |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.4 | netty-codec-http | RHSA-2026:23808 |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.2 | see advisory | RHSA-2026:24502 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el7eap | RHSA-2026:53644 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 8 | eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el8eap | RHSA-2026:53645 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-42584 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-42584 across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.