NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-32313 — xmlseclibs

HIGHFix: robrichards/xmlseclibs@03062be

CVE-2026-32313 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-354 vulnerability in robrichards/xmlseclibs. A fix is available for robrichards/xmlseclibs — see the affected versions and patch details below.

xmlseclibs is Missing AES-GCM Authentication Tag Validation on Encrypted Nodes Allows for Unauthorized Decryption

Also known asGHSA-4v26-v6cg-g6f9
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32313.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs5th percentile — riskier than 5% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.22%0.44%0.67%0.1%0.2%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘robrichards/xmlseclibs

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

XML nodes encrypted with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm lack validation of the authentication tag length. An attacker can use this to brute-force an authentication tag, recover the GHASH key, and decrypt the encrypted nodes. It also allows to forge arbitrary ciphertexts without knowing the encryption key.

Details

When decrypting with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm here, the $authTag is set from a substr(), but never has its length validated (it should be validated with something like strlen($authTag) == self::AUTHTAG_LENGTH). For that reason, a shorter than expected data blob will allow for the $authTag to have as short a tag as only one byte (see PHP's documentation).

See this example:

function test($data) {
    $ivSize = 12;
    $tagSize = 16;

    $iv = substr($data, 0, $ivSize);
    $data = substr($data, $ivSize);
    $offset = 0 - $tagSize;
    $tag = substr($data, $offset);
    $ct = substr($data, 0, $offset);

    echo 'IV: "' . $iv . '"' . PHP_EOL;
    echo 'Tag: "' . $tag . '"' . PHP_EOL;
    echo 'CT: "' . $ct . '"' . PHP_EOL;
}

/* Outputs:
php > test('myNonceNoncet');
IV: "myNonceNonce"
Tag: "t"
CT: ""
php > test('myNonceNonceta');
IV: "myNonceNonce"
Tag: "ta"
CT: ""
php > test('myNonceNoncetag');
IV: "myNonceNonce"
Tag: "tag"
CT: ""
*/

With a legit ciphertext in hand, this is enough to recover the GHASH key. With that key, any authenticated tags can be computed offline which allows for decryption of the ciphertext and forgery of arbitrary ciphertexts.

PoC

  1. Setup a server expecting XML with an encrypted assertion
  2. Create an XML document with an encrypted assertion (encrypted with aes-256-gcm)

Note: The steps from 3 to 6 are implemented in this exploit script: nonce_reuse_with_fmt_val_oracle.py. You can run the script with sage -python nonce_reuse_with_fmt_val_oracle.py -s 'url-encoded_and_base64-encoded_samlresponse'

  1. Take the content of the <xenc:CipherValue> node and apply the following modifications
    1. Base64-decode the content
    2. Take the first 12 bytes and save them as the nonce
    3. Take the last 16 bytes and save them as the tag
    4. Now brute-force the tag of an empty ciphertext
      1. Loop through all 256 possible byte values (let's call that byte_tag_attempt)
      2. Concatenate together the nonce and the byte_tag_attempt
      3. Base64-encode the result
      4. Replace the content of the <xenc:CipherValue> node with this result
      5. On http errors 500, we learn that the tag is valid
      6. Do the same for the next byte of the tag until all 16 bytes have been brute-forced
  2. With this new tag and the empty ciphertext, compute the GHASH key (the way to do this has been described in this blog post)
  3. Use this GHASH key to compute authentication tags offline for arbitrary ciphertexts
  4. Decryption is done by observing XML parsing errors that occur after modifying the ciphertext, those can be seen as http errors 500

poc.webm

Impact

The general impact is:

  • XML nodes encrypted with AES-GCM can be decrypted by observing parsing differences
  • XML nodes encrypted with AES-GCM can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value
  • The GCM internal GHASH key can be recovered

In cases where the encryption key is embedded in the XML and is encrypted with the Service Provider's public key (like often done with SAML), the last two items don't have a big impact. This is because:

  • With the Service Provider's public key, an arbitrary ciphertext can be created with a known symmetric key
  • The symmetric keys are generated on the fly every time the IdP creates a new SAMLResponse

In any case, secrets that are embedded in the XML, whether coming from an IdP, or from another scheme, can be decrypted.

Important: If static symmetric keys are used, as the GHASH key could have leaked, you must rotate those keys.

References

For additional information on the issue, you can refer to this blog post about the OpenSSL issue and how it can be exploited.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistrobrichards/xmlseclibsall versions3.1.5composer require robrichards/xmlseclibs:^3.1.5

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
xmlseclibsxmlseclibs_project
< 3.1.5
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for robrichards/xmlseclibs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update robrichards/xmlseclibs to 3.1.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32313 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary XML nodes encrypted with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm lack validation of the authentication tag length. An attacker can use this to brute-force an authentication tag, recover the [GHASH key](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois/Counter_Mode#:~:text=%29%20is%20the-,hash%20key,-%2C%20a%20string%20of), and decrypt the encrypted nodes. It also allows to forge arbitrary ciphertexts without knowing the encryption key. ### Details When decrypting with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm [here](https://github.com/robrichards/xmlseclibs/blob/2bdfd742624d739df
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-32313 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-32313: xmlseclibs — Fixed in 3.1.5