NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 SwiftURL
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-27120 — leaf-kit

MEDIUMFix: vapor/leaf-kit@8919e39

CVE-2026-27120 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) CWE-75 vulnerability in github.com/vapor/leaf-kit. A fix is available for github.com/vapor/leaf-kit — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Leaf-kit html escaping does not work on characters that are part of extended grapheme cluster

Also known asGHSA-4hfh-fch3-5q7p
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-27120.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs19th percentile — riskier than 19% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.26%0.53%0.79%0.0%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
📦github.com/vapor/leaf-kit

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects SwiftURL packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

htmlEscaped in leaf-kit will only escape html special characters if the extended grapheme clusters match, which allows bypassing escaping by using an extended grapheme cluster containing both the special html character and some additional characters. In the case of html attributes, this can lead to XSS if there is a leaf variable in the attribute that is user controlled.

Details

Relevant code: https://github.com/vapor/leaf-kit/blob/main/Sources/LeafKit/String%2BHTMLEscape.swift#L14

Strings in Swift are based on extended grapheme clusters. HTML on the other hand is based on unicode characters.

For example if you have the sequence "́ (U+0022 Quotation mark followed by U+0301 Combining Acute Accent). To HTML this is just a quote mark followed by some other random character. To swift this is one extended grapheme cluster that does not equal a quotation mark by itself which is a different extended grapheme cluster.

Thus "\"́".replacingOccurrences(of: "\"", with: """) does not replace the quote mark. This allows you to break out of html attributes.

I believe replacingOccurences takes an optional third parameter that allows you to specify options to make it work on UTF-8 characters instead of grapheme clusters, which would be a good fix for this issue.

I see depending on version, leafkit might use replacing instead of replacingOccurences. I don't know swift that well and couldn't find docs on what replacing does, so I don't know if both versions of the function are affected. The version of swift i was testing on I believe was using replacingOccurences

It seems like replacingOccurences will skip past prefix characters of extended grapheme clusters, which is what would be needed in order to meaningfully bypass esaping of <. Thus i think this is mostly limited to attributes and not general text.

PoC

An example vapor application that is vulnerable might look like

routes.swift

import Vapor

struct Hello: Content {
    var msg: String?
}

func routes(_ app: Application) throws {
    app.post { req throws in
	let Hello = try req.content.decode(Hello.self)
        return req.view.render("hello", [
            "msg": Hello.msg ?? "Hello World!"
        ])
    }
}

With a hello.leaf that looks like

<div title="#(msg)">Hover to see message</div>

And then you POST something like msg=%22%cc%81=1%20autofocus%20tabindex=0%20onfocus=alert(1)%20

Impact

If a website uses leaf to escape an attribute value based on user input, the attacker may be able to insert a malicious attribute. If a site is not using a secure CSP policy, then this can be used to execute malicious javascript (XSS). Impact is context dependent if a site is using a secure CSP policy.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦SwiftURLgithub.com/vapor/leaf-kitall versions1.4.1

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
leafkitvapor
< 1.14.1
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/vapor/leaf-kit, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/vapor/leaf-kit to 1.4.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-27120 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `htmlEscaped` in leaf-kit will only escape html special characters if the extended grapheme clusters match, which allows bypassing escaping by using an extended grapheme cluster containing both the special html character and some additional characters. In the case of html attributes, this can lead to XSS if there is a leaf variable in the attribute that is user controlled. ### Details Relevant code: https://github.com/vapor/leaf-kit/blob/main/Sources/LeafKit/String%2BHTMLEscape.swift#L14 Strings in Swift are based on extended grapheme clusters. HTML on the other hand is based
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-27120 in your dependencies?

Find it across SwiftURL, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-27120: leaf-kit XSS — Fixed in 1.4.1