Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2025-61911 — python-ldap

Fix: python-ldap/python-ldap@3957526

CVE-2025-61911 is a CWE-75 vulnerability in python-ldap. A fix is available for python-ldap — see the affected versions and patch details below.

python-ldap has sanitization bypass in ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars

Also known asGHSA-r7r6-cc7p-4v5mPYSEC-2026-1847
Published
Oct 10, 2025
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-61911.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs26th percentile — riskier than 26% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍python-ldap

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The sanitization method ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars can be tricked to skip escaping of special characters when a crafted list or dict is supplied as the assertion_value parameter, and the non-default escape_mode=1 is configured.

Details

The method ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars supports 3 different escaping modes. escape_mode=0 (default) and escape_mode=2 happen to raise exceptions when a list or dict object is supplied as the assertion_value parameter. However, escape_mode=1 happily computes without performing adequate logic to ensure a fully escaped return value.

PoC

>>> import ldap.filter

Exploitable

>>> ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars(["abc@*()/xyz"], escape_mode=1)
'abc@*()/xyz'
>>> ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars({"abc@*()/xyz": 1}, escape_mode=1)
'abc@*()/xyz'

Not exploitable

>>> ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars("abc@*()/xyz", escape_mode=1)
'abc@\\2a\\28\\29\\2fxyz'
>>> ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars(["abc@*()/xyz"], escape_mode=0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/local/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/ldap/filter.py", line 41, in escape_filter_chars
    s = assertion_value.replace('\\', r'\5c')
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'replace'
>>> ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars(["abc@*()/xyz"], escape_mode=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/local/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/ldap/filter.py", line 36, in escape_filter_chars
    r.append("\\%02x" % ord(c))
                        ^^^^^^
TypeError: ord() expected a character, but string of length 11 found

Impact

If an application relies on the vulnerable method in the python-ldap library to escape untrusted user input, an attacker might be able to abuse the vulnerability to launch ldap injection attacks which could potentially disclose or manipulate ldap data meant to be inaccessible to them.

With Python being a dynamically typed language, and the commonly used JSON format supporting list and dict, it is to be expected that Python applications may commonly forward unchecked and potentially malicious list and dict objects to the vulnerable sanitization method.

The vulnerable escape_mode=1 configuration does not appear to be widely used.

Suggested Fix

Add a type check at the start of the ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars method to raise an exception when the supplied assertion_value parameter is not of type str.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpython-ldapall versions3.4.5pip install --upgrade 'python-ldap==3.4.5'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for python-ldap, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update python-ldap to 3.4.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-61911 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-61911 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2025-61911. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The sanitization method `ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars` can be tricked to skip escaping of special characters when a crafted `list` or `dict` is supplied as the `assertion_value` parameter, and the non-default `escape_mode=1` is configured. ### Details The method `ldap.filter.escape_filter_chars` supports 3 different escaping modes. `escape_mode=0` (default) and `escape_mode=2` happen to raise exceptions when a `list` or `dict` object is supplied as the `assertion_value` parameter. However, `escape_mode=1` happily computes without performing adequate logic to ensure a fully esca
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-61911 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2025-61911 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2025-61911: python-ldap | O3 Security