CVE-2026-26231 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.5) CWE-863 vulnerability in code.gitea.io/gitea. A fix is available for code.gitea.io/gitea — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Gitea maintainer-edit permissions allow unauthorized commits to readable repositories
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-26231.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-26231 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 381,682 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
code.gitea.io/giteaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Any authenticated low-privilege user with read access to a repository can push arbitrary commits directly to that repository, bypassing all write-access checks.
Vulnerability
Gitea's "Allow edits from maintainers" PR option can be abused via reverse-fork PRs:
- The web UI PR-create endpoint binds
allow_maintainer_edit=truewithout verifying that the submitter has write access to the HEAD repository. - Gitea allows creating a PR where BASE = attacker's fork and HEAD = upstream target. The attacker is "maintainer" of the BASE (their own fork), so the flag is set against the upstream HEAD.
- On
git pushover HTTP/SSH, Gitea relaxes the required access mode toReadwhenSupportProcReceiveis enabled (routers/web/repo/githttp.go,routers/private/serv.go) and defers enforcement to the pre-receive hook. - The pre-receive hook calls
CanMaintainerWriteToBranch(models/issues/pull_list.go), which finds the malicious PR, seesAllowMaintainerEdit=true, and checks whether the pusher has write access to the BASE repo. Since BASE is the attacker's own fork, the check passes and the push is authorized against the upstream.
Exploitation
- Attacker forks the target repository.
- Attacker visits the web compare endpoint and creates a PR with
BASE = their_fork,HEAD = upstream, and "Allow edits from maintainers" checked. - Attacker clones their fork, makes a commit, and runs
git push <upstream_url> <branch>— the push is accepted.
Reproduction
python3 poc.py --repo http://gitea:3000/victim/repo --user attacker --password attacker_pass
Expected output:
[+] target: victim/my_repo default branch: main
[*] forking -> attacker/my_repo_pocfork (202)
[+] fork ready
[+] malicious PR created (BASE=attacker fork, HEAD=upstream)
remote: . Processing 1 references
remote: Processed 1 references in total
To http://192.168.101.20:3000/victim/my_repo.git
e5c07b3..9a0b884 main -> main
[+] latest commit on victim/my_repo@main: 'PoC: unauthorized commit via maintainer-edit bypass'
[+] CONFIRMED: unauthorized push to upstream succeeded.
A PWNED.txt file will appear on the target repo's default branch, committed by the attacker who has no write access.
Impact
Full repository compromise. Any logged-in user can backdoor any repository they can read, including all public repositories on the instance.
Suggested Fix
Two independent checks are missing; both should be added for defense in depth:
- At PR creation: before setting
AllowMaintainerEdit = true, verify the submitter has write access to the HEAD repository. - In
CanMaintainerWriteToBranch: verify that the PR's HEAD repo matches the repository being pushed to, and that the PR was opened by a legitimate owner/writer of the HEAD repository. Do not trustAllowMaintainerEditsolely based on BASE write access.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.gitea.io/gitea | all versions | 1.26.2go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.26.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.gitea.io/gitea, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.26.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-26231 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-26231 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.