CVE-2026-21445 — langflow-base
Fix: langflow-ai/langflow@3fed9feCVE-2026-21445 is a Missing Authentication vulnerability in langflow-base. EPSS puts its 30-day exploitation probability at 33.7% (98th percentile). A fix is available for langflow-base — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Langflow Missing Authentication on Critical API Endpoints
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-21445.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
langflow-base🐍langflowReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.7.0.dev45, multiple critical API endpoints in Langflow are missing authentication controls. The issue allows any unauthenticated user to access sensitive user conversation data, transaction histories, and perform destructive operations including message deletion. This affects endpoints handling personal data and system operations that should require proper authorization. Version 1.7.0.dev45 contains a patch.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | langflow-base | all versions | 0.7.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow-base==0.7.1' |
| 🐍PyPI | langflow | all versions | 1.7.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.7.1' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow-base, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update langflow-base to 0.7.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-21445 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-21445 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-21445. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
How to detect CVE-2026-21445
A community-maintained Nuclei template exists for this CVE. You can scan for it directly:
nuclei -id cve-2026-21445 -u https://target- Template
- Langflow - Broken Access Control
- Severity
- critical
- Impact
- Unauthenticated attackers can access sensitive user data and perform destructive actions, risking data loss and privacy breaches.
- Remediation
- Update to version 1.7.0.dev45 or later.
Template by ProjectDiscovery nuclei-templates (DhiyaneshDk), MIT licensed. View the full template. Scan only systems you are authorised to test.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-21445 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-21445 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.