CVE-2025-27794 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.8) CWE-74 vulnerability in flarum/core. A fix is available for flarum/core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Flarum Vulnerable to Session Hijacking via Authoritative Subdomain Cookie Overwrite
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-27794.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-27794 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
flarum/core🐘flarum/frameworkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A session hijacking vulnerability exists when an attacker-controlled authoritative subdomain under a parent domain (e.g., subdomain.host.com) sets cookies scoped to the parent domain (.host.com). This allows session token replacement for applications hosted on sibling subdomains (e.g., community.host.com) if session tokens aren't rotated post-authentication.
Key Constraints:
- Attacker must control any subdomain under the parent domain (e.g.,
evil.host.comorx.y.host.com). - Parent domain must not be on the Public Suffix List.
Due to non-existent session token rotation after authenticating we can theoretically reproduce the vulnerability by using browser dev tools, but due to the browser's security measures this does not seem to be exploitable as described.
Proof of Concept (Deno)
Deno.serve({
port: 8000, // default
hostname: 'localhost',
onListen: (o) => console.log(`Server started at http://${o.hostname}:${o.port}`, o),
},
async (req) => (console.log(req), new Response(
`You've been served! You came from ${req.headers.get('referer')}`,
{
//status: 302, // would redirect user to page they came from
status: 200,
headers: {
'set-cookie': 'session_cookie=mytoken; Domain=.deno.dev; Secure; HttpOnly',
'location': req.headers.get('referer')
}
}
))
);
Attack Flow
- Attacker Setup: Hosts server at
evil.host.com. - Harvest Session Token: Attacker visits
community.host.comto get a session token for himself to replace the victim's token with his own. - Victim Interaction: User clicks link to
https://evil.host.com. - Cookie Override: Server sets cookie with
Domain=.host.comand the harvested token from step 2. - Session Hijacking: Victim's future requests to
community.host.comuse attacker's token.
Why Reverse DNS Subdomains Fail
Browsers block cookie setting for parent domains unless:
- Authoritative Subdomain: Server must belong to a direct child domain (e.g.,
a.host.com, notx.y.host.com). - Public Suffix Exclusion: If
host.comis on the Public Suffix List (e.g., likegithub.io), browsers block cross-subdomain cookies.
Example:
- ❌
123.cust.dynamic.host.com→ Cannot setDomain=.host.com. - ✅
evil.host.com→ Can setDomain=.host.com(if not on PSL).
Browser Security Behavior
1. Cookie Domain Validation
Per RFC 6265 §5.3:
Cookies can only be set for domains the server is authoritative for.
2. Public Suffix List (PSL)
Domains like host.com on the PSL trigger browser protections:
Subdomains of PSL-listed domains cannot set cookies for parent domains.
Verification:
- Check PSL status: https://publicsuffix.org/list/
Impact
- Account Takeover: Attacker gains authenticated session access.
- Data Exposure: Email, private messages, and other personal data exposed.
- Exploitable Only If:
- Parent domain is not PSL-listed.
- Attacker controls direct child subdomain (e.g.,
evil.host.com).
Remediation
- Session Token Rotation:
// After authentication: invalidateOldSession(); const newToken = generateToken(); - Cookie Scoping (already in place):
// Restrict cookies to explicit subdomain: "Set-Cookie": "session=token; Domain=community.host.com; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax"; - Public Suffix Registration:
Addhost.comto the Public Suffix List via PSL Submission.
Revised Vulnerability Criteria
Prerequisites:
- Attacker controls authoritative subdomain (e.g.,
evil.host.com). - Parent domain (
host.com) is not PSL-listed. - Session tokens persist post-authentication.
References
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | flarum/core | all versions | 1.8.10composer require flarum/core:^1.8.10 |
| 🐘Packagist | flarum/framework | all versions | 1.8.10composer require flarum/framework:^1.8.10 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flarum/core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update flarum/core to 1.8.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-27794 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-27794 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-27794. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-27794 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-27794 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.