Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2025-27794 flarum/core

MEDIUMFix: flarum/framework@a05aaea

CVE-2025-27794 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.8) CWE-74 vulnerability in flarum/core. A fix is available for flarum/core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Flarum Vulnerable to Session Hijacking via Authoritative Subdomain Cookie Overwrite

Also known asGHSA-hg9j-64wp-m9px
Published
Mar 12, 2025
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-27794.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs41th percentile — riskier than 41% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2025-27794 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐘flarum/core🐘flarum/framework

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A session hijacking vulnerability exists when an attacker-controlled authoritative subdomain under a parent domain (e.g., subdomain.host.com) sets cookies scoped to the parent domain (.host.com). This allows session token replacement for applications hosted on sibling subdomains (e.g., community.host.com) if session tokens aren't rotated post-authentication.

Key Constraints:

  • Attacker must control any subdomain under the parent domain (e.g., evil.host.com or x.y.host.com).
  • Parent domain must not be on the Public Suffix List.

Due to non-existent session token rotation after authenticating we can theoretically reproduce the vulnerability by using browser dev tools, but due to the browser's security measures this does not seem to be exploitable as described.


Proof of Concept (Deno)

Deno.serve({
    port: 8000, // default
    hostname: 'localhost',
    onListen: (o) => console.log(`Server started at http://${o.hostname}:${o.port}`, o),
  },
  async (req) => (console.log(req), new Response(
    `You've been served! You came from ${req.headers.get('referer')}`,
    {
      //status: 302, // would redirect user to page they came from
      status: 200,
      headers: {
        'set-cookie': 'session_cookie=mytoken; Domain=.deno.dev; Secure; HttpOnly',
        'location': req.headers.get('referer')
      }
    }
  ))
);

Attack Flow

  1. Attacker Setup: Hosts server at evil.host.com.
  2. Harvest Session Token: Attacker visits community.host.com to get a session token for himself to replace the victim's token with his own.
  3. Victim Interaction: User clicks link to https://evil.host.com.
  4. Cookie Override: Server sets cookie with Domain=.host.com and the harvested token from step 2.
  5. Session Hijacking: Victim's future requests to community.host.com use attacker's token.

Why Reverse DNS Subdomains Fail

Browsers block cookie setting for parent domains unless:

  1. Authoritative Subdomain: Server must belong to a direct child domain (e.g., a.host.com, not x.y.host.com).
  2. Public Suffix Exclusion: If host.com is on the Public Suffix List (e.g., like github.io), browsers block cross-subdomain cookies.

Example:

  • 123.cust.dynamic.host.com → Cannot set Domain=.host.com.
  • evil.host.com → Can set Domain=.host.com (if not on PSL).

Browser Security Behavior

1. Cookie Domain Validation

Per RFC 6265 §5.3:

Cookies can only be set for domains the server is authoritative for.

2. Public Suffix List (PSL)

Domains like host.com on the PSL trigger browser protections:

Subdomains of PSL-listed domains cannot set cookies for parent domains.

Verification:


Impact

  • Account Takeover: Attacker gains authenticated session access.
  • Data Exposure: Email, private messages, and other personal data exposed.
  • Exploitable Only If:
    • Parent domain is not PSL-listed.
    • Attacker controls direct child subdomain (e.g., evil.host.com).

Remediation

  1. Session Token Rotation:
    // After authentication:
    invalidateOldSession();
    const newToken = generateToken();
    
  2. Cookie Scoping (already in place):
    // Restrict cookies to explicit subdomain:
    "Set-Cookie": "session=token; Domain=community.host.com; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax";
    
  3. Public Suffix Registration:
    Add host.com to the Public Suffix List via PSL Submission.

Revised Vulnerability Criteria

Prerequisites:

  • Attacker controls authoritative subdomain (e.g., evil.host.com).
  • Parent domain (host.com) is not PSL-listed.
  • Session tokens persist post-authentication.

References

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistflarum/coreall versions1.8.10composer require flarum/core:^1.8.10
🐘Packagistflarum/frameworkall versions1.8.10composer require flarum/framework:^1.8.10

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flarum/core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update flarum/core to 1.8.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-27794 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-27794 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2025-27794. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## **Summary** A session hijacking vulnerability exists when an attacker-controlled **authoritative subdomain** under a parent domain (e.g., `subdomain.host.com`) sets cookies scoped to the parent domain (`.host.com`). This allows session token replacement for applications hosted on sibling subdomains (e.g., `community.host.com`) if session tokens aren't rotated post-authentication. **Key Constraints**: - Attacker must control **any subdomain** under the parent domain (e.g., `evil.host.com` or `x.y.host.com`). - Parent domain must **not** be on the [Public Suffix List](https://publics
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-27794 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2025-27794 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2025-27794: flarum/core (Medium 6.8) | O3 Security