CVE-2024-28250 — cilium
MEDIUMCVE-2024-28250 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) CWE-311 vulnerability in github.com/cilium/cilium. A fix is available for github.com/cilium/cilium — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-28250.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/cilium/cilium🐹github.com/cilium/ciliumReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies:
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes.
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.
Patches
This issue affects:
- In native routing mode (
routingMode=native):- Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8
- Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2
- In tunneling mode (
routingMode=tunnel):- Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4
- Cilium v1.14.4 if
encryption.wireguard.encapsulateis set tofalse(default).
This issue has been resolved in:
- In native routing mode (
routingMode=native):- Cilium v1.14.8
- Cilium v1.15.2
- In tunneling mode (
routingMode=tunnel):- Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE
encryption.wireguard.encapsulatemust be set totrue.
- Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE
Workarounds
There is no workaround to this issue.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @brb, @giorio94, @gandro and @jschwinger233 for their work on triaging and remediating this issue.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.
If you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and your report will be treated as top priority.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/cilium/cilium | ≥ 1.14.0&&< 1.14.8 | 1.14.8go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.14.8 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/cilium/cilium | ≥ 1.15.0&&< 1.15.2 | 1.15.2go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.15.2 |
Affected Products
ciliumciliumDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/cilium/cilium, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/cilium/cilium to 1.14.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-28250 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2024-28250 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.