Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6

MEDIUM

Unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies

Also known asBIT-cilium-2024-28250BIT-cilium-operator-2024-28250BIT-cilium-proxy-2024-28250BIT-hubble-2024-28250BIT-hubble-relay-2024-28250BIT-hubble-ui-2024-28250
Published
Mar 18, 2024
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk7th percentile+0.12%
0.00%0.22%0.45%0.67%0.1%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/cilium/cilium🐹github.com/cilium/cilium

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies:

  • Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes.
  • Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.

Patches

This issue affects:

  • In native routing mode (routingMode=native):
    • Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8
    • Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2
  • In tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel):
    • Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4
    • Cilium v1.14.4 if encryption.wireguard.encapsulate is set to false (default).

This issue has been resolved in:

  • In native routing mode (routingMode=native):
    • Cilium v1.14.8
    • Cilium v1.15.2
  • In tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel):
    • Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true.

Workarounds

There is no workaround to this issue.

Acknowledgements

The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @brb, @giorio94, @gandro and @jschwinger233 for their work on triaging and remediating this issue.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.

If you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and your report will be treated as top priority.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/cilium/cilium1.14.0&&< 1.14.81.14.8
🐹Gogithub.com/cilium/cilium1.15.0&&< 1.15.21.15.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/cilium/cilium. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/cilium/cilium to 1.14.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies: - Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes. - Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes. ### Patches This issue affects: * In native routing mode (`routingMode=native`): * Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8 * Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2 * In tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`): * Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4 * Cilium v1.14.4
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.