NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2023-29008 — @sveltejs/kit

HIGHFix: sveltejs/kit@ba436c6

CVE-2023-29008 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in @sveltejs/kit. A fix is available for @sveltejs/kit — see the affected versions and patch details below.

SvelteKit framework has Insufficient CSRF protection for CORS requests

Also known asGHSA-gv7g-x59x-wf8f
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 3, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-29008.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs31th percentile — riskier than 31% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.29%0.58%0.87%0.3%0.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

216other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@sveltejs/kitnpm
4.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. The protection is implemented at kit/src/runtime/server/respond.js. While the implementation does a sufficient job of mitigating common CSRF attacks, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying an upper-cased Content-Type header value. The browser will not send uppercase characters on form submission, but this check does not block all expected cross-site requests: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS#simple_requests

Details

The CSRF protection is implemented using the code shown below.

		const forbidden =
			is_form_content_type(request) &&
			(request.method === 'POST' ||
				request.method === 'PUT' ||
				request.method === 'PATCH' ||
				request.method === 'DELETE') &&
			request.headers.get('origin') !== url.origin;

		if (forbidden) {
			const csrf_error = error(403, `Cross-site ${request.method} form submissions are forbidden`);
			if (request.headers.get('accept') === 'application/json') {
				return json(csrf_error.body, { status: csrf_error.status });
			}
			return text(csrf_error.body.message, { status: csrf_error.status });
		}

If the incoming request specifies a POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE method, the protection will compare the server’s origin with the value of the HTTP Origin header. A mismatch between these values signals that a potential attack has been detected. The final check is performed on the request’s Content-Type header whether the value is either application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data or text/plain. If all the previous checks pass, the request will be rejected with an 403 error response. However, is_form_content_type, which is responsible for checking the value of the Content-Type header, is not sufficient to mitigate all possible variations of this type of attack. Since this function is checking Content-Type with lower-cased values, and the browser accepts upper-cased Content-Type header to be sent, a CSRF attack performed with the Content-Type header that contains an upper-cased character (e.g., text/plaiN) can circumvent the protection and the request will be processed by the endpoint handler.

<!-- ### PoC 1. Set up the SvelteKit with `POST /api/test` endpoint. 2. Replace `REPLACE_DOMAIN` in the following HTML. ``` html <script> (async() => { await fetch("https://REPLACE_DOMAIN/api/test", {method: "POST", headers:{"Content-Type":"text/plaiN"}, body: "hello=world"}); })(); </script> ``` 3. Confirm that a POST request is processed by the server. -->

Impact

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. This may lead to all POST operations requiring authentication being allowed in the following cases:

  1. If the target site sets SameSite=None on its auth cookie and the user visits a malicious site in a Chromium-based browser
  2. If the target site doesn't set the SameSite attribute explicitly and the user visits a malicious site with Firefox/Safari with tracking protections turned off.
  3. If the user is visiting a malicious site with a very outdated browser.

Remediations

It is preferred to update to SvelteKit 1.15.2. It is also recommended to explicitly set SameSite to a value other than None on authentication cookies especially if the upgrade cannot be done in a timely manner.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@sveltejs/kitall versions1.15.2npm install @sveltejs/kit@1.15.2

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
sveltekitsvelte
< 1.15.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @sveltejs/kit, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @sveltejs/kit to 1.15.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-29008 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. The protection is implemented at `kit/src/runtime/server/respond.js`. While the implementation does a sufficient job of mitigating common CSRF attacks, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying an upper-cased `Content-Type` header value. The browser will not send uppercase characters on form submissi
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2023-29008 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2023-29008: @sveltejs/kit CSRF — Fixed in 1.15.2